Jelavic has arrived at Murray Park

[KingKirk 26,501]

an ex player Mark hateley

[Guest SandyIniesta-Nordahl]

Kris Boyd?

Chadam?

[ritchieshearercaldow 22,404]

I'd be dissapointed if people I told use it publicly guys

Especially for future things

You still haven't answered...Why would any EX Rangers player be given this information, unless he is involved in the Management team?

Not very confidential sending Text maessages

[Big Laff's Dodgy Barnett 20]

Kris Boyd?

Chadam?

naw mate, not Hateley either

[RM Monitor And Standards Officer 112,906]

Anyone fance a score bet that a story will be released from gary glitters safe haven about a bid for bellamy, keane or dzeko or some other multi million pound player to keep the priests flock happy?

[Gillete 1,338]

Couldn't tell you mate

I'm just passing on a text I got from a pal of mine who happens to be a rangers legend , if he's wrong then I can't help that , I'm only passing on info he gave me

he wouldn't text if it wasn't reliable

[Right_To_Censor 1,951]

its DJ

[Big Laff's Dodgy Barnett 20]

its DJ

no it's not

[Right_To_Censor 1,951]

its DJ

no it's not

surely to christ i've hung neil lennon now?

[rfcShaun 10]

its DJ

no it's not

surely to christ i've hung neil lennon now?

Close friend of Ally and Walter.

[ritchieshearercaldow 22,404]

Couldn't tell you mate

I'm just passing on a text I got from a pal of mine who happens to be a rangers legend , if he's wrong then I can't help that , I'm only passing on info he gave me

he wouldn't text if it wasn't reliable

Most EX Rangers players are Legends

[M-89 549]

Couldn't tell you mate

I'm just passing on a text I got from a pal of mine who happens to be a rangers legend , if he's wrong then I can't help that , I'm only passing on info he gave me

he wouldn't text if it wasn't reliable

give us his initials?

[Big Laff's Dodgy Barnett 20]

it better be true

[MuirhouseBear 291]

I've just woke up. What's the latest? We agreed a fee?

[G.E.C. 19,594]

Prso?

[Big Laff's Dodgy Barnett 20]

Prso?

nope

[KingKirk 26,501]

Goram? would u say if we guess right?

[papaguy51 941]

Leave the guy alone FFS. I'm sure we'll hear something official tomorrow.

[cooper1989 0]

I'm pretty sure a fee has to be agreed in order to talk to the player properly, doesn't it?

Absolutely mate. No way we can talk to an under contract player -- unless a fee has been agreed.

Formalities follow. Wages agreed, medical. Done deal.

In fact, he wouldn't even get to Glasgow without all of this being agreed (Eagles and wankers like him aside.)

[Guest SandyIniesta-Nordahl]

Once again, I find disappointment. Once again, I find no satisfaction. Once again, I find that conversations with Mr. Gillete are no more intellectual than a game of darts at the local pub. For openers, a central point of Gillete's belief systems is the notion that anyone who disagrees with Gillete is a potential terrorist. Perhaps he should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think he'd find that there are three fairly obvious problems with his treatises, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to clarify and correct some of the inaccuracies present in his hastily mounted campaigns. First, another point worth thinking about is that he is immovably entrenched in his unstable philosophical positions. Second, he justifies his thievery by saying things like, "It's for the good of society". And third, if it turns out that there's no way to prevent him from silencing anyone whom he considers obdurate then I guess it'll be time to throw my cards on the table and call it quits. I'll just have to give up trying to make this world a kinder, gentler place and accept the fact that he is interpersonally exploitative. That is, he takes advantage of others to achieve his own beastly ends. Why does he do that? He doesn't want you to know the answer to that question; he wants to ensure you don't oppose him and all he stands for.

Gillete has been known to "prove" statistically that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. As you might have suspected, his proof is flawed. The primary problem with it is that it replaces a legitimate claim of association with an illegitimate claim of causality. Consequently, Gillete's "proof" demonstrates only that it takes more than a mass of insincere sensualists to provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward feudalism. The first lies that he told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; Gillete's lies will grow until they blot out the sun.

I'm not saying this to be stolid but rather to explain that Gillete just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to impose a one-size-fits-all model on how society should function." Put simply, he maintains that his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. Perhaps it would be best for him to awaken from his delusional, narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that I've tried explaining to his operatives that the right thing to do in this case is determined by various vectors of forces in an endless multidimensional tug-of-war involving ropes leading out in many directions. Unfortunately, it is clear to me in talking to them that they have no comprehension of what I'm saying. I might as well be talking to creatures from Mars. In fact, I'd bet Martians would be more likely to discern that Gillete is too foul-mouthed to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that it's really a tragedy that his goal in life is apparently to craft propaganda that justifies making serious dialogue difficult or impossible. Here, I use the word "tragedy" as the philosopher Whitehead used it. Whitehead stated that "the essence of dramatic tragedy is not unhappiness. It resides in the solemnity of the remorseless working of things," which I interpret as saying that if Gillete were to use more accessible language then a larger number of people would be able to understand what he's saying. The downside for Gillete, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that all of his janissaries are thieves—idle, envious, and ready to plunder and enslave their weaker neighbors. It's therefore not surprising that Gillete can't possibly believe that he's merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. He's wily but he's not that wily. Whenever I hear someone say that Mr. Gillete's bunco games are Right with a capital R, my upper lip develops an involuntary curl. So I give you this letter. I hope it helps.

[ritchieshearercaldow 22,404]

Goram? would u say if we guess right?

Course he won't say, he's a Wind Up Merchant

[Gillete 1,338]

Sandy are you on drugs ?

[GlenH79 42]

Once again, I find disappointment. Once again, I find no satisfaction. Once again, I find that conversations with Mr. Gillete are no more intellectual than a game of darts at the local pub. For openers, a central point of Gillete's belief systems is the notion that anyone who disagrees with Gillete is a potential terrorist. Perhaps he should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think he'd find that there are three fairly obvious problems with his treatises, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to clarify and correct some of the inaccuracies present in his hastily mounted campaigns. First, another point worth thinking about is that he is immovably entrenched in his unstable philosophical positions. Second, he justifies his thievery by saying things like, "It's for the good of society". And third, if it turns out that there's no way to prevent him from silencing anyone whom he considers obdurate then I guess it'll be time to throw my cards on the table and call it quits. I'll just have to give up trying to make this world a kinder, gentler place and accept the fact that he is interpersonally exploitative. That is, he takes advantage of others to achieve his own beastly ends. Why does he do that? He doesn't want you to know the answer to that question; he wants to ensure you don't oppose him and all he stands for.

Gillete has been known to "prove" statistically that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. As you might have suspected, his proof is flawed. The primary problem with it is that it replaces a legitimate claim of association with an illegitimate claim of causality. Consequently, Gillete's "proof" demonstrates only that it takes more than a mass of insincere sensualists to provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward feudalism. The first lies that he told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; Gillete's lies will grow until they blot out the sun.

I'm not saying this to be stolid but rather to explain that Gillete just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to impose a one-size-fits-all model on how society should function." Put simply, he maintains that his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. Perhaps it would be best for him to awaken from his delusional, narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that I've tried explaining to his operatives that the right thing to do in this case is determined by various vectors of forces in an endless multidimensional tug-of-war involving ropes leading out in many directions. Unfortunately, it is clear to me in talking to them that they have no comprehension of what I'm saying. I might as well be talking to creatures from Mars. In fact, I'd bet Martians would be more likely to discern that Gillete is too foul-mouthed to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that it's really a tragedy that his goal in life is apparently to craft propaganda that justifies making serious dialogue difficult or impossible. Here, I use the word "tragedy" as the philosopher Whitehead used it. Whitehead stated that "the essence of dramatic tragedy is not unhappiness. It resides in the solemnity of the remorseless working of things," which I interpret as saying that if Gillete were to use more accessible language then a larger number of people would be able to understand what he's saying. The downside for Gillete, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that all of his janissaries are thieves—idle, envious, and ready to plunder and enslave their weaker neighbors. It's therefore not surprising that Gillete can't possibly believe that he's merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. He's wily but he's not that wily. Whenever I hear someone say that Mr. Gillete's bunco games are Right with a capital R, my upper lip develops an involuntary curl. So I give you this letter. I hope it helps.

I remember that site :L

[ritchieshearercaldow 22,404]

Once again, I find disappointment. Once again, I find no satisfaction. Once again, I find that conversations with Mr. Gillete ......etc,etc

My Heids hurtin'

[Big Laff's Dodgy Barnett 20]

Once again, I find disappointment. Once again, I find no satisfaction. Once again, I find that conversations with Mr. Gillete are no more intellectual than a game of darts at the local pub. For openers, a central point of Gillete's belief systems is the notion that anyone who disagrees with Gillete is a potential terrorist. Perhaps he should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think he'd find that there are three fairly obvious problems with his treatises, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to clarify and correct some of the inaccuracies present in his hastily mounted campaigns. First, another point worth thinking about is that he is immovably entrenched in his unstable philosophical positions. Second, he justifies his thievery by saying things like, "It's for the good of society". And third, if it turns out that there's no way to prevent him from silencing anyone whom he considers obdurate then I guess it'll be time to throw my cards on the table and call it quits. I'll just have to give up trying to make this world a kinder, gentler place and accept the fact that he is interpersonally exploitative. That is, he takes advantage of others to achieve his own beastly ends. Why does he do that? He doesn't want you to know the answer to that question; he wants to ensure you don't oppose him and all he stands for.

Gillete has been known to "prove" statistically that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. As you might have suspected, his proof is flawed. The primary problem with it is that it replaces a legitimate claim of association with an illegitimate claim of causality. Consequently, Gillete's "proof" demonstrates only that it takes more than a mass of insincere sensualists to provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward feudalism. The first lies that he told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; Gillete's lies will grow until they blot out the sun.

I'm not saying this to be stolid but rather to explain that Gillete just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to impose a one-size-fits-all model on how society should function." Put simply, he maintains that his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. Perhaps it would be best for him to awaken from his delusional, narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that I've tried explaining to his operatives that the right thing to do in this case is determined by various vectors of forces in an endless multidimensional tug-of-war involving ropes leading out in many directions. Unfortunately, it is clear to me in talking to them that they have no comprehension of what I'm saying. I might as well be talking to creatures from Mars. In fact, I'd bet Martians would be more likely to discern that Gillete is too foul-mouthed to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that it's really a tragedy that his goal in life is apparently to craft propaganda that justifies making serious dialogue difficult or impossible. Here, I use the word "tragedy" as the philosopher Whitehead used it. Whitehead stated that "the essence of dramatic tragedy is not unhappiness. It resides in the solemnity of the remorseless working of things," which I interpret as saying that if Gillete were to use more accessible language then a larger number of people would be able to understand what he's saying. The downside for Gillete, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that all of his janissaries are thieves—idle, envious, and ready to plunder and enslave their weaker neighbors. It's therefore not surprising that Gillete can't possibly believe that he's merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. He's wily but he's not that wily. Whenever I hear someone say that Mr. Gillete's bunco games are Right with a capital R, my upper lip develops an involuntary curl. So I give you this letter. I hope it helps.

seriously mate, you need to get out more