CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Have we a name yet for the mystery SFA lawyer who found Naismith 'guilty'? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 110,129 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 There was a guy named in yesterdays sun mate! I don't know if he was the guy that decides there is a case against you or the actual reviewer! Colin something I think! Not 100 percent sure though Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfajerk 23 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Have we a name yet for the mystery SFA lawyer who found Naismith 'guilty'?I've just met the rotting carcas of Columbo and he ,ever so softly , whispered the name in my shell - like,it was Perry Mason Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
covenanter 158 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Have we a name yet for the mystery SFA lawyer who found Naismith 'guilty'?Apparently an Edinburgh based Brief by the name of Will Cole. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT 8,293 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Super and the Club didny even know ,even by the late stage of lastnight ( Evening Times 28/09/11 ) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregor Stevens Fan Club 42 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Have we a name yet for the mystery SFA lawyer who found Naismith 'guilty'?It was quite clear that Naisy was guilty of the offence and deserves his two game ban. End of story.Let's not get involved in some kind of witch-hunt, where there is a possibility of an individual's personal details revealed on an internet site. Which may result in some members posting things that might get themselves and indeed this forum into trouble Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayboleLoyal_atb 3,772 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Some character Cole was mentioned in the sun yesterday. Nae doubt some sad case is trying hard as fuck to find out whether is great great papa was a Mason or a priest! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senna 735 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 It was quite clear that Naisy was guilty of the offence and deserves his two game ban. End of story.Let's not get involved in some kind of witch-hunt, where there is a possibility of an individual's personal details revealed on an internet site. Which may result in some members posting things that might get themselves and indeed this forum into trouble Well said that man. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 I hope he has a suspicious sounding name. O'Something. It will add fuel my paranoia and keep me bleating about anti-Rangers agenda's for a few more weeks.Fuck it, even if he hasn't I'll do it anyway. Everyones against us, the Romanists have permeated every level of Scottish society, so they have.On a completely unrelated matter - sarcasm is the funniest form of wit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DietofWorms 2,067 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 I hope he has a suspicious sounding name. O'Something. It will add fuel my paranoia and keep me bleating about anti-Rangers agenda's for a few more weeks.Fuck it, even if he hasn't I'll do it anyway. Everyones against us, the Romanists have permeated every level of Scottish society, so they have.On a completely unrelated matter - sarcasm is the funniest for of wit.By anyones standards,that's real poor form. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 By anyones standards,that's real poor form.I managed to spell 'permeated' right as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 I managed to spell 'permeated' right as well.God bless the spell chcek (see what I did there) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Mustard 380 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 It was quite clear that Naisy was guilty of the offence and deserves his two game ban. End of story.Let's not get involved in some kind of witch-hunt, where there is a possibility of an individual's personal details revealed on an internet site. Which may result in some members posting things that might get themselves and indeed this forum into trouble How about there is a bit of transparency into the procedure, and we are told who is referring each case to whoever is dolling out the punishments.Are we going to be kept informed of why one player has his case referred, and another is totally ignored, or is found not guilty? Are we going to get an assurance that every camera angle of every incident is supplied by the TV company, and not just the footage that some Sky or ESPN employee decides is relevant? As far as I know, no one has told us who decides what material the judge and jury guy is to be provided with. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Whoever it is should remain anonymous. Any investigations and findings should be published though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
corkinator 611 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 why is it secret, I do not understand, any other walk of life the judge is named, why not in football? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 why is it secret, I do not understand, any other walk of life the judge is named, why not in football?It's a two tier process. If you want to know who the "judges" are you appeal the decision then you get to have your say and see who is handing it down. I think it's a great idea and could work in main courts as well. Somebody takes a quick look, within reason, looks at a persons history and passes a judgement/sentence which is either accepted without a court appearance or appealed to kick off a court appearance. Brilliant idea. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
watp72 54 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Father William Cole Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ogbg 20 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 It's a two tier process. If you want to know who the "judges" are you appeal the decision then you get to have your say and see who is handing it down. I think it's a great idea and could work in main courts as well. Somebody takes a quick look, within reason, looks at a persons history and passes a judgement/sentence which is either accepted without a court appearance or appealed to kick off a court appearance. Brilliant idea.I like it also but only if you're told the reasoning behind the decision so you know what it is you are appealing exactly. I think that's probably the case here but I'm not sure. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Some character Cole was mentioned in the sun yesterday. Nae doubt some sad case is trying hard as fuck to find out whether is great great papa was a Mason or a priest! :lol: Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,709 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Are we still back in the dignified silence days ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbairds 24 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Well said that man.as long as this rule is fair and used all the time.no arguements here. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Jolson 3 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Were the rules not meant to increase transparency? There's absolutely no reason to keep the individuals name secret and, as far as I know, it was the guy Cole mentioned earlier in the thread. Also, to be fair to the SFA, I don't think they kept that fact secret. Not quite sure what Ally's alluding to with this statement. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
corkinator 611 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 It's a two tier process. If you want to know who the "judges" are you appeal the decision then you get to have your say and see who is handing it down. I think it's a great idea and could work in main courts as well. Somebody takes a quick look, within reason, looks at a persons history and passes a judgement/sentence which is either accepted without a court appearance or appealed to kick off a court appearance. Brilliant idea.So, what if the "judge" presiding over the first tier has a vested intrest? I still see NO reason to be annonymous. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndBoydScores 8 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 Another thing, is it always going to be the same guy judging or different persons ? if it's different judges you run the risk of different sentencing, and there you have another can of bloody worms. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted September 29, 2011 Share Posted September 29, 2011 So, what if the "judge" presiding over the first tier has a vested intrest? I still see NO reason to be annonymous.Well if he has a vested interest and keeps handing out bans that get appealed, it soon becomes obvious he is not doing the job right. If however 75% of his bans are accepted, then clearly the clubs have confidence in him. As I say, it's actually a brilliant idea as long as each case reviewed is made public. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.df745cc91b83abab0590131961ba2774.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.