RichardFoster 41 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Nobody is saying you can't have a moan about Rangers, we all do but some comments over the weekend have been embarrassing to be perfectly honest. I'd like to know where that guy got the 69% stat from, because it's utter pish. Unless he's a master of working out possession percentages while at football matches, because he wouldn't have got information like that from Rangers TV. Threads like 'new manager start of next season' when we are currently 7 points clear is sickening, and I think some people need a reality check that this isn't the old days and we don't have players like Gascoigne or Laudrup anymore. But we've got a good lead, and contary to popular belief we have played very well in a few matches this season in the league. Ok Europe and the league cup were mistakes by Ally in his first few weeks and games as manager and he's held his hands up and I don't think he'll make them again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 A fan of someone else then, celtic is the obvious example. Nobody can claim to be a fan of a club if they don't want them to win every single match they play or in any way feel pleasure when they don't do well.I'm on holiday in Spain at the moment, what should I do? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Have some tapas? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Have some tapas?Good shout, I wont enjoy that, so its allowed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoniram 1,919 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Because i can... That's what cowards on the net do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted October 17, 2011 Author Share Posted October 17, 2011 That's what cowards on the net do.Thank god we have brave guys like you as an example to the rest of us... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokcy 4 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 St mirren had 55% possession, http://www.scotprem.com/content/default.asp?page=s13_1_1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Trevelyan 15 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 would you say you are correct in saying that it is a stream of pish not a torrant, jet ,river,current, drift, flood, flow, freshet, race, rill, rindle, rivulet, run, runnel, rush, spate, spritz, surge or tide? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 For example St Mirren had 69% possession at Ibrox at one point in the match. Is that belittling our achievement? No it's fact and deserves to be discussed as such.At various points they had 100% possession.So what? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 would you say you are correct in saying that it is a stream of pish not a torrant, jet ,river,current, drift, flood, flow, freshet, race, rill, rindle, rivulet, run, runnel, rush, spate, spritz, surge or tide?More of a runnel. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 At various points they had 100% possession.So what?I was going to make this point earlier but thought it too pedantic, even for me. Sir, I saute you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigie79 67 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 St mirren had 55% possession, http://www.scotprem.com/content/default.asp?page=s13_1_1They also had a third less attempts at goal than us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted October 17, 2011 Author Share Posted October 17, 2011 I was going to make this point earlier but thought it too pedantic, even for me. Sir, I saute you. It would also have been the 3rd time it was made.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 To point out the negatives the blind faithful don't wish to see or discuss?If only so much effort was put in by certain posters towards pointing out positives. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 I was going to make this point earlier but thought it too pedantic, even for me. Sir, I saute you. Saute: 'cooked or browned in a pan containing a small quantity of butter, oil, or other fat.'I didn't realise I was going to be the tapas Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardFoster 41 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 At various points they had 100% possession.So what?I was going to make this point earlier but thought it too pedantic, even for me. Sir, I saute you. Think that French dude eluded to that point yesterday or earlier today It's true though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 I'm on holiday in Spain at the moment, what should I do?Right WVB you'd lost me, not even sure if you agree or disagree with what I'm saying. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokcy 4 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 They also had a third less attempts at goal than us.I don't think they scored a third less goals than us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Saute: 'cooked or browned in a pan containing a small quantity of butter, oil, or other fat.'I didn't realise I was going to be the tapas Illiterate Loyal Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Right WVB you'd lost me, not even sure if you agree or disagree with what I'm saying. That is correct. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 It would also have been the 3rd time it was made....What time was I thinking of posting it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigie79 67 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 I don't think they scored a third less goals than us.That's the only statistic that matters Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokcy 4 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 That's the only statistic that mattersNot when St Mirren have more possession than us at Ibrox it isn't. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardFoster 41 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Was the 55% taken from injury time because that might be believed, they didn't have that much throughout the match. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigie79 67 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Not when St Mirren have more possession than us at Ibrox it isn't.Ok maybe next time we can have 55% possession but still draw 1-1 keep every body happy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.