gunslinger 270 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Is it true another sitting has been agreed for May ?no. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM1872 3,776 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 I strangely have a good feeling about this. Not sure whether it'll be a settlement or a victory. Either way though, I hope we've fucking learned our lesson!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneDavidCooper 2,505 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 What tax case? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sicknote 26 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 If we win this, it will be interesting to see where all the money went if it didn't go on players wages. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
debear 603 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Any update?Nobody knows anything about it, as usual, so its full of the usual speculative pish. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 If we win this, it will be interesting to see where all the money went if it didn't go on players wages.what money Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 So whats it to be? Do we have to wait 2 months for this to get sorted? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
novosleftboot 6,323 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 If we win this, it will be interesting to see where all the money went if it didn't go on players wages.Think you may have missed the point here. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
broxibear87 129 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Maybe if we lost the case and went into administration HMRC would not be that bothered as it would allow them to go after other cases. And with even having to write off the money we owe them, it might not bother them as winning the case was their goal. But let us hope we win the case and get back to normal.Unfortunately I think your right. I pray to god we win this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 If we win this, it will be interesting to see where all the money went if it didn't go on players wages. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteGersWATP 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 So whats it to be? Do we have to wait 2 months for this to get sorted?I heard last week that's the most likely time to get a result, yes Fingers crossed! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marmalade1872 40 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 june Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sicknote 26 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 what moneyT h e m o n e y t h a t w a s p a i d i n t o t h e E B T s c h e m e , t h a t H M R C h a v e a c c u s e d u s o f u s i n g f o r w a g e s . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgruntled_bear 157 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 T h e m o n e y t h a t w a s p a i d i n t o t h e E B T s c h e m e , t h a t H M R C h a v e a c c u s e d u s o f u s i n g f o r w a g e s .The money went to the player, we used the scheme to get bigger name players to the club on higher wages.It's kind of like when you get your pay slip at the end of the week, and you look at the amount of Tax and NI you contribute and sigh. Well we used the scheme to slim line the amount paid out to Tax and NI and the player got it all in a basic wage.The scheme was only supposed to be used on bonuses, not basic wages. hence why HMRC are contesting it. We are disputing that it is legal to do both. hence why the court case. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sicknote 26 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Why on Earth have you typed it like that? And we did have the EBT scheme. That's not what's being debated. It's legality of that scheme.Unless I've totally misunderstood this whole thing since day 1 Was spelling it out. Maybe, I've misunderstood it from day 1. If so I apologise. My understanding was it was perfectly legal to have an EBT scheme, but we were accused of using it illegally(paying wages. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Was spelling it out. Maybe, I've misunderstood it from day 1. If so I apologise. My understanding was it was perfectly legal to have an EBT scheme, but we were accused of using it illegally(paying wages.The money that went into the EBT was paid to players. HMRC allege that we used the scheme illegally so we owe tax on that money.Whether that is true or not, the money went to the players. Would you prefer I type it with a gap between each letter? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sicknote 26 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 The money that went into the EBT was paid to players. HMRC allege that we used the scheme illegally so we owe tax on that money.Whether that is true or not, the money went to the players. Would you prefer I type it with a gap between each letter?My understanding was that we were disputing that the money went to players, not the legality of using an EBT to pay wages. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 So do we take it that the case has ended since it's now 1800 and we haven't heard about any more postponements. ?Let's hope we win this or get off with a manageable amount. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 My understanding was that we were disputing that the money went to players, not the legality of using an EBT to pay wages.Your understanding is wrong then Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluegecko 306 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 My understanding was that we were disputing that the money went to players, not the legality of using an EBT to pay wages.Then yes you have misunderstood from day 1! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 110,543 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Well i really hope we win this and just to think this is the last of the legacy SDM left us.Hopefully we find no more skeletons tucked away. From hero to zero Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 6 weeks Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hesaidnototheprovos 75 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 We are winning this!!! Great feeling that we get the decision in our favour!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sicknote 26 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 gunslingerApologies for earlier post (spelling it out), I've been looking at this whole situation without all facts. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.