Thermopylae 15,287 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Its a shame that's been lost for good. Similar to Belfast, the investment wasn't forthcoming when it was required at a time when the far Eastern yards invested and took over. Its a skill set that's been lost for good nowRegarding the flag, I'm not sure. I know from seeing ships in Liverpool, and talking to people, that generally house flags are flown from the main mast while the Ensign is flown down aft. I don't recall seeing a house flag flown from the forward mast, though I generally only see Merchant ships. I must ask about itWe still have Fairfields in Govan of course but unfortunately that's the last. We just never supported our ship building industry in this country so the most recent 2 Cunarders were built in France and Italy .One of Fairfields old ships HMS Renown with a white ensign Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAFREG 471 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Pacific shelf 595 limited must remain on the front page of this Forum so that every taig visitor can read about the non history of there scabby club. " And if you know their History it`s enough to make you laugh your bollocks off hahaha ETC. " Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tartansmokie 36 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Just posting to try and keep the Pacific shelf 595 limited topic curren Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonbryce 63 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 The Pacific Shelf 595 Limited Football and Athletic Company Limited.Apparently incorporated on 11th October 1994 with registered offices at 24 Great King Street, Edinburgh and subsequently changed their name to The Pacific Shelf 595 Limited Football and Athletic Company, which currently trades as Pacific Shelf 595 Limited Football Club.Seems they don't have any problem with a name change, or the fact their history is still intact....................................................................EDIT: Why the fuck does it no let me edit ma post?!?! It's supposed tae say in the 1st line " The Pacific Shelf 595 Limited Football and Athletic Company Limited". WTF! Fuck it. Am away back tae ma work. Obviously somebody beat me tae it............................................Yes, every refence to the Parkhead side is automatically replaced with a reference to Pacific Shelf 595 Ltd. Someone earlier copied a Scotsman article about the Arsenal share business, which said something about that other side doing a similar thing with their holding in Rangers shares, but from the timing of when they did it, it was clearly the old pre Pacific 595 company that did it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 14 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 There's a problem with this. C eltic Football and Athletic Company Limited (Pacific Sherlf 595) is not the football club. It's a wee crappy company that doesn't do much.C eltic plc appears to own the ground and the players. The income from the games and players wages go through C eltic F.C. Ltd.I'd suggest that RM gets rid of the whole Pacific Shelf 595 thing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 14 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 There's a problem with this. C eltic Football and Athletic Company Limited (Pacific Sherlf 595) is not the football club. It's a wee crappy company that doesn't do much.C eltic plc appears to own the ground and the players. The income from the games and players wages go through C eltic F.C. Ltd.I'd suggest that RM gets rid of the whole Pacific Shelf 595 thing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Finger on the pulse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 110,241 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 That's the booler for yae casey first with last weeks news Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikhailichenko 90 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 There's a problem with this. C eltic Football and Athletic Company Limited (Pacific Sherlf 595) is not the football club. It's a wee crappy company that doesn't do much.C eltic plc appears to own the ground and the players. The income from the games and players wages go through C eltic F.C. Ltd.I'd suggest that RM gets rid of the whole Pacific Shelf 595 thing.I've been keeping my powder dry with this one as I see it the same as yourself. until someone can prove otherwise it would appear that the original company is still in existence and is either operating as Paedophile FC or is its parent company. I would be delighted to be proved wrong. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikhailichenko 90 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 There's a problem with this. C eltic Football and Athletic Company Limited (Pacific Sherlf 595) is not the football club. It's a wee crappy company that doesn't do much.C eltic plc appears to own the ground and the players. The income from the games and players wages go through C eltic F.C. Ltd.I'd suggest that RM gets rid of the whole Pacific Shelf 595 thing.Replied to your same post in the other thread.I think given our current situation we would be thrilled to get something on the chunts. However it would appear a bandwagon has started and a lot of bears have jumped on without knowing the full facts. This definitely requires further investigation. Now it is out there all over social media it gives them a chance to prepare their defence, which they already have from what I have seen. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 14 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 I've been keeping my powder dry with this one as I see it the same as yourself. until someone can prove otherwise it would appear that the original company is still in existence and is either operating as Paedophile FC or is its parent company. I would be delighted to be proved wrong.The original company is C eltic plc. What I can't figure out is why al the income and costs are going through C eltic F.C. Ltd and the players are owned by C eltic plc.If anyone wants to have a go at them then I'd suggest they pick on C eltic F.C. Ltd, formed on 24th September 2001 Ltd as HMS (402) Ltd (perhaps some royalty reference in there). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikhailichenko 90 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 The original company is C eltic plc. What I can't figure out is why al the income and costs are going through C eltic F.C. Ltd and the players are owned by C eltic plc.If anyone wants to have a go at them then I'd suggest they pick on C eltic F.C. Ltd, formed on 24th September 2001 Ltd as HMS (402) Ltd (perhaps some royalty reference in there).Is c eltic FC Ltd a subsidiary of c eltic PLC or vice versa? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 There's a problem with this. C eltic Football and Athletic Company Limited (Pacific Sherlf 595) is not the football club. It's a wee crappy company that doesn't do much.C eltic plc appears to own the ground and the players. The income from the games and players wages go through C eltic F.C. Ltd.I'd suggest that RM gets rid of the whole Pacific Shelf 595 thing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 14 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Is c eltic FC Ltd a subsidiary of c eltic PLC or vice versa?C eltic FC is the parent company and owns c eltic FC Ltd, which is turn owns the company AKA Pacific Shelf 595 Ltd. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Arse Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,622 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 C eltic FC is the parent company and owns c eltic FC Ltd, which is turn owns the company AKA Ltd.They will always be Pacific Shelf 595 to me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 Worth bumping this one!Did UEFA exclude Pacific Shelf 595 from three years of European competition?Did the SFA or then SFL penalise Pacific Shelf 595 with fines and points deductions?Did Pacific Shelf 595 get sent to the lowest table in the league?Did Pacific Shelf 595 lose rights to the pre-1994 history? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sobatai 70 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 There was no administration or liquidation.Shouldn't the petty bitterness be left to supporters of that club? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 There was no administration or liquidation.Shouldn't the petty bitterness be left to supporters of that club?Sorry mate, but that's a shite post.The fact remains, it is a different legal entity. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 There's a problem with this. C eltic Football and Athletic Company Limited (Pacific Sherlf 595) is not the football club. It's a wee crappy company that doesn't do much.C eltic plc appears to own the ground and the players. The income from the games and players wages go through C eltic F.C. Ltd.Is that consistent with the rules, i.e. one distinct legal entity owning the players and a different, second legal entity paying them their contractual wages? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 It's worth remembering that the club and its assets can be transferred pre-liquidation, thus circumventing certain penalties. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Bump Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilko89 507 Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 I posted this in the general sports section last night and I'm just wondering why the registration date of this company was in 2001? http://companycheck.co.uk/company/SC223604 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilko89 507 Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 And what is this also that Lawell is a part of ?http://companycheck.co.uk/company/OC305070#creditreport Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 And what is this also that Lawell is a part of ?http://companycheck.co.uk/company/OC305070#creditreportmy eyesight ain't the best at times, what's that in your Sig? On my phone and it just looks yella Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.