RFC55 110,367 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 I don't believe my 'source' ever, he is forever on the wind up about rangers, maybe he got lucky eh.Probably a shettleston, just like Mr A n other Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 administrators seem happy with the players even if the rampant socialists on here aren't. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*ricardopatrese* 0 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 I can see admin and players points of view. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baxterboy 476 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 he can't name them then they can go after him.if it's true, then what does he to fear?who's gonna go after him?i thought the internet KGB were only interested in dudes like me who make disparaging remarks against fenians Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 if it's true, then what does he to fear?who's gonna go after him?i thought the internet KGB were only interested in dudes like me who make disparaging remarks against feniansif indeed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baxterboy 476 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 if indeed.sorry, i'm still confused who will 'go after' Boss if he names names. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 You think this thread was healthy?Don't know about it being healthy but it lets know whats going on. Isn't that what we all want? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 sorry, i'm still confused who will 'go after' Boss if he names names.depends who he names. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 Don't know about it being healthy but it lets know whats going on. Isn't that what we all want?but it doesn't. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 but it doesn't.Look mate. If Boss came oan here and said the pope wiz a katholik, you'd disagree wae him.Ye need tae gie it a by at times. Especially at times like this, when all we want is the truth, and tae see our club come out of these dark times.Sorry, but thats how I see it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 administrators seem happy with the players even if the rampant socialists on here aren't.I thought you said that the administrators were behind all this and wanted us to believe the stories? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 I thought you said that the administrators were behind all this and wanted us to believe the stories? and? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,513 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 Get off the grassy knoll and start naming names....... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnberry18 3,204 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 To call this post misguided would be an understatement, and if the OP is quite happy to ignore the wider context of the circumstances the players find themselves in then fine. I am sure some players will not exactly welcome their names bandied about for all to speculate on; but what's that compared to badgering them on an internet forum at this very sensitive time for everyone involved in Rangers? If I am reading it properly, you are hoping that this in some way forces them to the 'table'?: not wise in my opinion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 and?....now you are saying that they are happy with the players.What changed? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 ....now you are saying that they are happy with the players.What changed?I don't see the two view points as mutually exclusive. but listening to the interview its clear the admins aren't as rigid on clauses etc as boss makes out so perhaps that's changed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gers51 2 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 Probably a shettleston, just like Mr A n other Maybe just an idiot just like Mr A n other.Low post count does not equal tim 'mate'. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted March 8, 2012 Author Share Posted March 8, 2012 Look mate. If Boss came oan here and said the pope wiz a katholik, you'd disagree wae him.Ye need tae gie it a by at times. Especially at times like this, when all we want is the truth, and tae see our club come out of these dark times.Sorry, but thats how I see it. You're right, he would. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 I don't see the two view points as mutually exclusive. but listening to the interview its clear the admins aren't as rigid on clauses etc as boss makes out so perhaps that's changed.I didn't think that they had discussed the specifics of the deals.Cheers anyway. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 Look mate. If Boss came oan here and said the pope wiz a katholik, you'd disagree wae him.Ye need tae gie it a by at times. Especially at times like this, when all we want is the truth, and tae see our club come out of these dark times.Sorry, but thats how I see it.only if he was lying. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnberry18 3,204 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 I don't see the two view points as mutually exclusive. but listening to the interview its clear the admins aren't as rigid on clauses etc as boss makes out so perhaps that's changed.And you take that interview being reliable word for word? I would say there are a lot of people playing their words very carefully right now; which is not exactly a novel exercise on these type of occasions. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 And you take that interview being reliable word for word? I would say there are a lot of people playing their words very carefully right now; which is not exactly a novel exercise on these type of occasions.probably mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted March 8, 2012 Author Share Posted March 8, 2012 To call this post misguided would be an understatement, and if the OP is quite happy to ignore the wider context of the circumstances the players find themselves in then fine. I am sure some players will not exactly welcome their names bandied about for all to speculate on; but what's that compared to badgering them on an internet forum at this very sensitive time for everyone involved in Rangers? If I am reading it properly, you are hoping that this in some way forces them to the 'table'?: not wise in my opinion.I've no problem with folk having a different view. We'll find out tomorrow whether enough pressure has been put on hearts and minds for certain players to deal at last. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baxterboy 476 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 depends who he names.i am sure Boss is certain his information is accurate, otherwise it would be completely irresponsible of him to start such a post.thus, if his information is indeed factual, then players he names cannot legally go after him for defamation. therefore, he is protected.further, the internet KGB have the power to force admin to provide ip addresses of members, however, players, to my knowledge, do not.therefore, how would the players involved ever know who Boss is if they do not have access to private info on RM? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 I didn't think that they had discussed the specifics of the deals.Cheers anyway.no probs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.