CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Outgoings is on Club, not trio !Mind, this might have changed in the last MonthCould you PM me. We appear to be at cross purposes here. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Mr Bacon, I believe you are getting a little mixed up. The management trio amounts if £1.5m are annual outgoings.I see what I did there. Sorry. So, if I change 'month' to 'annual' my point is valid. We're 400-big-ones shy every year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 I understand too, McCoists ineptitude in his job requires his protectors to sanction signings of players maybe 5/6 times higher than the level required in the hope he doesn't need to coach said playersMaybe, just maybe, it is felt that given the rapid progress up the league's that the club is expected to make (and the increase in quality of opposition with it) and the expectations of prolonged cup runs or even cup success it was a better idea to invest in a higher quality of player to avoid the need for massive overhauls every summer and to allow players the chance to settle and develop at Ibrox rather. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 I see what I did there. Sorry. So, if I change 'month' to 'annual' my point is valid. We're 400-big-ones shy every year.According to reports yesterday, we are at least £400g short a month for our outgoings. Over a season though with certain months we are idle, the figure increases where it averages out closer to £1m a month.Very dark days ahead but no questions are being asked by the lines of the accredited RST. Maybe in between making his millions in the business world and patronising Bears on twitter, Furry could pen a blog asking pertinent questions on our behlaf, sorry on their members behalf, sorry on their Boards behalf...... North Rd 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 According to reports yesterday, we are at least £400g short a month for our outgoings. Over a season though with certain months we are idle, the figure increases where it averages out closer to £1m a month.Very dark days ahead but no questions are being asked by the lines of the accredited RST. Maybe in between making his millions in the business world and patronising Bears on twitter, Furry could pen a blog asking pertinent questions on our behlaf, sorry on their members behalf, sorry on their Boards behalf......Are you me!! North Rd 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NamibianBear 1,851 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 According to reports yesterday, we are at least £400g short a month for our outgoings. Over a season though with certain months we are idle, the figure increases where it averages out closer to £1m a month.Very dark days ahead but no questions are being asked by the lines of the accredited RST. Maybe in between making his millions in the business world and patronising Bears on twitter, Furry could pen a blog asking pertinent questions on our behlaf, sorry on their members behalf, sorry on their Boards behalf......Are you me!!Now we have two Ed's... *Shakes Head* Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Maybe, just maybe, it is felt that given the rapid progress up the league's that the club is expected to make (and the increase in quality of opposition with it) and the expectations of prolonged cup runs or even cup success it was a better idea to invest in a higher quality of player to avoid the need for massive overhauls every summer and to allow players the chance to settle and develop at Ibrox rather.I take it being a Dude you play to your stereotype and smoke copious amounts of THC rich plants?The rapid rise through the leagues? For Southampton to reach the EPL did they need a wage bill second only to Man City in a much, much more competitive country? I don't want to burst your bubble, but Scottish football is absolutely dire. We should have the pick of the best kids in Scotland, training full time in the best facilities in Scotland. Our team last season was good enough for at least top half SSPL, with a proper manager of course. Re cup runs I think you have moved onto Class A drugs given we can't win the Ramsdens cup coupled with the shameful defeats in cups since McCoist took charge Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Now we have two Ed's... *Shakes Head*Well if that's the case at least one more voice chasing certain fuckers for answers that quite frankly are a joke. Resting in my account 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 I take it bring a Dude you okay to your stereotype and smoke copious amounts of THC rich plants?The rapid rise through the leagues? For Southampton to reach the EPL did they need a wage bill deck d only to Man City in a much, much more competitive country? I don't want to burst your bubble, but Scottish football is absolutely dire. We should have the pick of the best kids in Scotland, training full time in the best facilities in Scotland. Our team last season was good enough for at least top half SSPL, with a proper manager of course. Re cup runs I think you have moved onto Class A drugs given we can't win the Ramsdens cup coupled with the shameful defeats in cups since McCoist took chargeOr as my name, location and avatars all allude to its taken from the character played ny Jeff Bridges in 'The Big Lebowski'No they didn't need a massive wage bill bit they did need almost a decade to. And several managers. And three different owners. But other than that SouthamUpton is a great comparison. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 According to reports yesterday, we are at least £400g short a month for our outgoings. Over a season though with certain months we are idle, the figure increases where it averages out closer to £1m a month.Very dark days ahead but no questions are being asked by the lines of the accredited RST. Maybe in between making his millions in the business world and patronising Bears on twitter, Furry could pen a blog asking pertinent questions on our behlaf, sorry on their members behalf, sorry on their Boards behalf......Thank you! If we dont balance the books we could be heading for Share issue No2 IMO Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Or as my name, location and avatars all allude to its taken from the character played ny Jeff Bridges in 'The Big Lebowski'No they didn't need a massive wage bill bit they did need almost a decade to. And several managers. And three different owners. But other than that SouthamUpton is a great comparison.Smarty Pants. When Nigel Adkins yook over Southampton did he need a wage bill second to Man City to get through the leagues? My point being that for successive promotions, in a country were football is actually professional, all that was needed was a good manager and management team scouting, coaching and motivating. Ps I was pretending i was funny re your name. Sorry, i am not funny and should never attempt to be. I shall know better next time, Dude Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted July 2, 2013 Author Share Posted July 2, 2013 I reckon a wage bill of 2.5 mill per annuma squad of 24a management team salary of 500kis more than enough to get us back to the splthat is a 15mill warchest right there, for when we get back. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Smarty Pants. When Nigel Adkins yook over Southampton did he need a wage bill second to Man City to get through the leagues? My point being that for successive promotions, in a country were football is actually professional, all that was needed was a good manager and management team scouting, coaching and motivating. Ps I was pretending i was funny re your name. Sorry, i am not funny and should never attempt to be. I shall know better next time, Dude Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 I reckon a wage bill of 2.5 mill per annuma squad of 24a management team salary of 500kis more than enough to get us back to the splthat is a 15mill warchest right there, for when we get back.With the Management team we have!!yet that is the way it could be done, but, I have my suspicions a ceratin Mr King is bankrolling this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 I reckon a wage bill of 2.5 mill per annuma squad of 24a management team salary of 500kis more than enough to get us back to the splthat is a 15mill warchest right there, for when we get back.And how (when the players who transferred over earned a combined total higher than that) would you have gotten it down to such a level? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 And how (when the players who transferred over earned a combined total higher than that) would you have gotten it down to such a level?We can't outwith selling those players, however in the years in tales to get them off the wage I'll at that level we should be prudent with new signings' wages. Not chase after ex players past their sell by date and sick note ex-EPL goalkeepers who will be on dqft money for our level Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 We can't outwith selling those players, however in the years in tales to get them off the wage I'll at that level we should be prudent with new signings' wages. Not chase after ex players past their sell by date and sick note ex-EPL goalkeepers who will be on dqft money for our levelBy my reckoning we've got rid of 4 players replaced them with 7 and managed to reduce the wage bill further. To reduce the wage bill to a third of what it allegedly stands at would require a massive overhaul of the playing staff and a massive reduction in the 'quality' of players. MrMccoist 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMccoist 204 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 I reckon a wage bill of 2.5 mill per annuma squad of 24a management team salary of 500kis more than enough to get us back to the splthat is a 15mill warchest right there, for when we get back.This guy knows exactly what I meant. Ally is my hero yet even I can see the whole club is going down a ridiculous fiscal path. We had a chance to completely change the ethos of the club and pretty much have blown it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 How can you know we are spending too much?Hint, note the word loss.Rangers International Football Club Plc has reported a £7 million operating loss for the seven months to December 31, 2012.Revenues for the seven-month period were £9.5 million while costs ran to £16.5 million, leaving an operating loss of £7.04 million. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 This guy knows exactly what I meant. Ally is my hero yet even I can see the whole club is going down a ridiculous fiscal path. We had a chance to completely change the ethos of the club and pretty much have blown itIt's all well and good wanting to change an ethos but how do you practically go about it when players and management staff have contracts which have to be honoured or 're negotiated? How do you keep the fans onside when massive cost cutting is going to result in a big drop in quality of the players being signed, and many fans are far from happy with the quality of football already being served up? Why do we need to hoard money for an assault on the SPL as many have claimed? Would it not be beneficial to try build a team over a period of time and integrate youth players than sign lower league players only to have to do a massive overhaul in a few years time and replace them with players more suited to the top flight and European football? Resting in my account 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Hint, note the word loss.Rangers International Football Club Plc has reported a £7 million operating loss for the seven months to December 31, 2012.Revenues for the seven-month period were £9.5 million while costs ran to £16.5 million, leaving an operating loss of £7.04 million.Yes because there's been absolutely no money spent on anything other than wages. Nothing at all. No legal fees. No pay offs for ex directors. No purchasing of property, no short term loss of sources of income which will be restored in a few years time, we didn't have 2.1m withheld by the SPL. None of that contributes to that loss. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Yes because there's been absolutely no money spent on anything other than wages. Nothing at all. No legal fees. No pay offs for ex directors. No purchasing of property, no short term loss of sources of income which will be restored in a few years time, we didn't have 2.1m withheld by the SPL. None of that contributes to that loss.As I said note the word loss. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Yes because there's been absolutely no money spent on anything other than wages. Nothing at all. No legal fees. No pay offs for ex directors. No purchasing of property, no short term loss of sources of income which will be restored in a few years time, we didn't have 2.1m withheld by the SPL. None of that contributes to that loss.He continues to peddle the myth we are losing £1 million a month.I genuinely don't know why he is repeating that lie time after time.It's a strange thing to keep repeating. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 He continues to peddle the myth we are losing £1 million a month.I genuinely don't know why he is repeating that lie time after time.It's a strange thing to keep repeating.It's an even stranger thing to be unable to grasp, however as you are prone to wondering I can confirm today is Tuesday, should set your mind at ease. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted July 2, 2013 Author Share Posted July 2, 2013 And how (when the players who transferred over earned a combined total higher than that) would you have gotten it down to such a level?by not taking them over long term.... no need for LM boca alexander etc... move em onleave them training with the boys if need be Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.