KingKirk 25,695 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Fuck all wrong with what he says for once anyway Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferris Bueller 1,569 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Where does the view point of some that Murray is out to make/take money from the club come from? He seems to have the club at heart and there is no history of him taking significant money from the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary2006 123 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 are we still talking about paul murray,does the easdales not merit discussion?the easdales announced on the bbc they had bought green and ahmads shares,why have they not announced this to the stock exchange,are the easdales and jack irvine just employes of green and ahmad?its time we had some accurate information,do the easdales own green and ahmads shares?if not why are the easdales on the board? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Where does the view point of some that Murray is out to make/take money from the club come from? He seems to have the club at heart and there is no history of him taking significant money from the club.Or putting any money in Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary2006 123 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Or putting any money inhave the easdales put any money in?why are they getting a free ride,do you not think the same scrutiny should be put on the easdales that paul murray gets,the easdales have had a free ride its time they were put under the media spotlight. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mgg 3,766 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 have the easdales put any money in?why are they getting a free ride,do you not think the same scrutiny should be put on the easdales that paul murray gets,the easdales have had a free ride its time they were put under the media spotlight.I am sure they bought an initial amount of shares and have been buying more ever since, they were also supposed to be buying greens aswell, not sure if this has happened yet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 have the easdales put any money in?why are they getting a free ride,do you not think the same scrutiny should be put on the easdales that paul murray gets,the easdales have had a free ride its time they were put under the media spotlight.They're buying Greens shares/done a deal have they not? Or one of them Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted September 16, 2013 Author Share Posted September 16, 2013 Some chaps are unable to differ from the buying of shares the option to buy shares and having first refusal if shares are made available for purchase, they appear to think they all mean the same thing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Some chaps are unable to differ from the buying of shares the option to buy shares and having first refusal if shares are made available for purchase, they appear to think they all mean the same thing.Neither of which Mini has done Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,658 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Better with a good book than reading more of this shite we are being subjected to day in day out ! Although I raise a wee snigger the other day when my mole at the daily record told me apparently a disgruntled reader of said rag had appeared at the front door and managed to dislodge a bit of a slab and threw it through a glass panel in the revolving doors, don't do this at home ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferris Bueller 1,569 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Neither of which Mini has doneIs it a fact that Murray doesn't have shares?Also did Green not mouth off at one point about never wanting to deal with Murray? So him getting significant shares could have been difficult. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,276 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Political manoeuvring aside the most worrying thing is he felt the need to write it at all.Is it really that bad?Wouldn't more of the institutional investors be up in arms if the burn rate/profligacy was really that bad?What £12M is he talking about?The IPO £21M is a fallacy as far as I can see, after all we spent £4.5M advertising it, so immediately you are down to £16.5M.There is also the £5.5M loan to buy the club, will that will be shown on our books as a debt?Maybe I should give this place a miss until the accounts are released Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary2006 123 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Some chaps are unable to differ from the buying of shares the option to buy shares and having first refusal if shares are made available for purchase, they appear to think they all mean the same thing.the easdales are working for green and ahmad and you know it,the easdales wont buy greens shares,this is just an attempt to buy time for green and ahmad,they are running the show,they always have been,the easdales are basicaly just greens henchman,carrying out their plans,am i wrong? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Is it a fact that Murray doesn't have shares?Also did Green not mouth off at one point about never wanting to deal with Murray? So him getting significant shares could have been difficult.I've got minimal amount of shares tooMake me a director as well then Green went in Record a few weeks ago saying McColl and mini have 14 million into my account and you can have the club did he not? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted September 16, 2013 Author Share Posted September 16, 2013 Charlie who is our biggest individual shareholder has a tentative agreement with the Easdales that if Charlie puts his shares up for sale they may have first refusal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cherster Perry 1977 18 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Im not sure its a good idea for Murray to front this bid.It does look like his presence may be blinding people from some of the very real problems at board level. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Roll on the AGM then we can hear both their plans and then decide who stays and who gets voted off....Ps. Though I've made my mind up that Stockbridge goes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary2006 123 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Charlie who is our biggest individual shareholder has a tentative agreement with the Easdales that if Charlie puts his shares up for sale they may have first refusal.ah,a wee bit of honesty for a change,smoke and mirrors what a surprise,the easdales are the key to winning this pr war,paul murray is an easy target,irvine has done a great job burying murray,but lets face it murray was an easy target,lets see if the other side use their brains,the key for the other side to win the pr battle is to bury the easdales,do you agree? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferris Bueller 1,569 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 I've got minimal amount of shares tooMake me a director as well then Green went in Record a few weeks ago saying McColl and mini have 14 million into my account and you can have the club did he not?Nothing to stop you or any share holder, large or small being nominated for the board. Greens statement was his usual bluster aimed at further lining his pockets. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Nothing to stop you or any share holder, large or small being nominated for the board. Greens statement was his usual bluster aimed at further lining his pockets.The point was someone said he would refuse to deal - I'm just pointing out that's untrueYou thinking its bluster is neither here nor there Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEWISDOM 1 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 This is not a case of how many shares you have, it's about the best people to run the company,Mather ,Stockridge & co have proved they can't do it properly,where the fuck has the 30mill went to,wasted.They are only in it for the £'s and because of their incompetence and greed we are back in trouble,it's a disgrace we have allowed it to happen.The only way we will be able to attract further investment is by getting them out and getting in people that potential investors can TRUST and can have confidence in.Time for them to go,they have had their money back plus plenty on top.GTF. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted September 16, 2013 Author Share Posted September 16, 2013 ah,a wee bit of honesty for a change,smoke and mirrors what a surprise,the easdales are the key to winning this pr war,paul murray is an easy target,irvine has done a great job burying murray,but lets face it murray was an easy target,lets see if the other side use their brains,the key for the other side to win the pr battle is to bury the easdales,do you agree?No, you would have to bury Charlie which they the rhebels continually fail to do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minstral 5,375 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 Every day in the media and press, there is attack after attack on our club. It is about time our club banned the lot of them, instead of the usual pish of keeping our powder dry, until the right moment. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary2006 123 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 No, you would have to bury Charlie which they the rhebels continually fail to do.i disagree,people think the easdales have bought a massive stake in the club and its not true,if everybody new the easdales were nothing more than green and ahmads henchman,doing the everyday dirtywork for their boss .peoples opinion of them would change,in my opinion the easdales will never own greens shares because they couldnt afford to pay the kind of cash he is looking for,i think the easdales are just like stockbridge,somebody elses employe who are just in it for a big wage. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted September 16, 2013 Share Posted September 16, 2013 This is not a case of how many shares you have, it's about the best people to run the company,Mather ,Stockridge & co have proved they can't do it properly,where the fuck has the 30mill went to,wasted.They are only in it for the £'s and because of their incompetence and greed we are back in trouble,it's a disgrace we have allowed it to happen.The only way we will be able to attract further investment is by getting them out and getting in people that potential investors can TRUST and can have confidence in.Time for them to go,they have had their money back plus plenty on top.GTF.How can you say Mather and co have proven they've fucked it and wasted 30 million without seeing the books or knowing Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.