North Rd 2,860 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 http://www.investegate.co.uk/rangers-int-f-c--plc--RFC-/rns/holding-in-company/201309201745025823O/@BBCDouglasF: #Rangers announces Sandy Easdale now has voting rights over 24% of #RFC holding company, with shares worth £7.7m Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,547 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 minico are fucking bricking itwhats the share amount that requires you to bid for the rest of them? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 http://www.investegate.co.uk/rangers-int-f-c--plc--RFC-/rns/holding-in-company/201309201745025823O/@BBCDouglasF: #Rangers announces Sandy Easdale now has voting rights over 24% of #RFC holding company, with shares worth £7.7mHow does that work, "voting rights"? Does that mean that the owners of the shares (the ones he doesn't own himself) are legally bound to vote with him on everything? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calio 688 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 Nothing new there, Green`s consortium always had around that.The only thing changed is the person fronting it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted September 20, 2013 Author Share Posted September 20, 2013 How does that work, "voting rights"? Does that mean that the owners of the shares (the ones he doesn't own himself) are legally bound to vote with him on everything?I believe he also has BPH and Margarita proxies as well as his own. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 "shares worth £7.7m" And not one single penny of that has went to Rangers. For the people who are moaning about Jim McColl not investing anything into RANGERS what do you make of Sandy Easdale doing the exact same thing? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted September 20, 2013 Author Share Posted September 20, 2013 Nothing new there, Green`s consortium always had around that.The only thing changed is the person fronting it.Agree, Sandy is The new Green. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitre_mouldmaster 21,509 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 minico are fucking bricking itwhats the share amount that requires you to bid for the rest of them?30% I think mate.Dont know if it counts if your wife has some, and you have others and you have the voting rights to others that are held by a consortium. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,547 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 "shares worth £7.7m" And not one single penny of that has went to Rangers. For the people who are moaning about Jim McColl not investing anything into RANGERS what do you make of Sandy Easdale doing the exact same thing? of course some of that went into rangers, when the shares were first bought the money went into the club Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 How does that work, "voting rights"? Does that mean that the owners of the shares (the ones he doesn't own himself) are legally bound to vote with him on everything?I assume he has people with a collective 24% of shares who will back him. Not surprising considering he's CG and IA's pick. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 So will people be demanding we see this guys "plans for the future"? He's not invested a penny into Rangers but has a seat on the board and 24% of the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,547 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 So will people be demanding we see this guys "plans for the future"? He's not invested a penny into Rangers but has a seat on the board and 24% of the club.didnt he buy shares in the IPO Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 As far as I know he only has to make an offer to purchase all shares if he personally holds 29.9% Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitre_mouldmaster 21,509 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 of course some of that went into rangers, when the shares were first bought the money went into the clubBut if McColl was now to buy 100% of the shares, none of that would go to Rangers.Thats why people suggesting that he should shut up until he puts the money up, thinking the club will get any of it are wrong. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 of course some of that went into rangers, when the shares were first bought the money went into the clubHe's bought them from Charles Green. Or are you saying he's bought through the IPO aswell? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted September 20, 2013 Author Share Posted September 20, 2013 I was right@Chris_Jack89: Voting rights for 4m Blue Pitch Holding shares & 2.6m Margarita Funds Holding Trust shares in #Rangers disposed to Sandy Easdale Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,547 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 He's bought them from Charles Green. Or are you saying he's bought through the IPO aswell?doesnt even need to be the IPO, unless he buys the shares of a person who was gifted them (green, ally etc) then at SOME point the shares were bought with money that went to the club Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 I assume he has people with a collective 24% of shares who will back him. Not surprising considering he's CG and IA's pick.What I'm asking is are they somehow obliged to back him, or do they just have a gentleman's agreement? I don't get why you'd guarantee your vote to somebody full stop, particularly with several weeks until the AGM? God only knows what will happen between now and then. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,547 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 even if none of his money went into the club, at least he is going about things the right way, buy purchasing shares, some of the fans on here will likely spend more on rangers over the season than PM and JM will do Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
docspiderman 1,228 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 He's bought them from Charles Green. Or are you saying he's bought through the IPO aswell?It really doesn't matter; HE HAS PAID MONEY TO BUY SHARES! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 minico are fucking bricking itwhats the share amount that requires you to bid for the rest of them?We should all be bricking it. It's far too soon for any one party to have a controlling interest in the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kplfishtank 4,656 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 "shares worth £7.7m" And not one single penny of that has went to Rangers. For the people who are moaning about Jim McColl not investing anything into RANGERS what do you make of Sandy Easdale doing the exact same thing? can you expand on that? surely somewhere down the line the money went to Rangers, even I know that.did they not buy 1 share when they first came out? or have you just made that post up Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 Once shares are issued of course anybody buying them is giving money to the seller thats how it works its like a manufacturing company complaining that when somebody buys one of their products from B&Q the customer is paying the shop rather than the manufacturer, and if the Easdales did buy some during the IPO then they did put money into the club and even if they didnt at least they are willing to spend real cash unlike minico who want everything for free. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 even if none of his money went into the club, at least he is going about things the right way, buy purchasing shares, some of the fans on here will likely spend more on rangers over the season than PM and JM will doMy thoughts exactly.Take note Mini. Spend money and get your foot in the door. Never mind getting the fascists fascists and the ultras on side in wee meetings and forcing yourself in Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.