RFC Audited Accounts to be released by 10th Oct 2013

[Ace 3,556]

This is taken from a twitter account of a good bear who spoke with Brian Stockbridge this morning.

This will be in line with an AGM on or before 31st Oct 2013.

Take from this what you will.

[Bears r us 30,988]

Good news if true.

[RFC55 110,090]

Good news if true.

If only. One side will view them as decent and the other will discredit them and online life will continue on as it is just now sadly

[Parlaneloyal 353]

Stockbridge said the middle of September the last time he was asked

[OlegKuznetsov 10,816]

If only. One side will view them as decent and the other will discredit them and online life will continue on as it is just now sadly

[Carson's cat 744]

In Boardspeak mid-October is the new mid-September.

[Bears r us 30,988]

[quote name=Rfc52' timestamp='

290991' post='1061412248]

If only. One side will view them as decent and the other will discredit them and online life will continue on as it is just now sadly

I know what you mean, but at least if the accounts are released we might have a better idea what Is going on.

[ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895]

Stockbridge said the middle of September the last time he was asked

We know we have went over this millions of times. It was Mather who said he would "TRY" and get them out early but, TBH to them they are not the ones who do the accounts are they so it's not up to them when they come out or don't.

We all agree it was a stupid thing to say when he knew there was a good chance they weren't going to be early.

[Allanger 625]

BS is on holiday

[ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895]

Thought the accounts were supposed to be out a month before the AGM? Or does it not matter if they are 10 days late?

[gogzy 31,195]

They board were asked to have audited accounts out before the AGM, which it looks like they will do.

That gives us 3 wees of going over the accounts before the AGM. If there is anything dodgy there, then it will be found IMO.

[Gillete 1,338]

Hope the AGM isn't the 31st

[elephants stoned 2,994]

Good news but Rfc52s right the accounts will change nothing in terms of the agendas, good accounts will see Minis supporters launching claims of cover ups and false bookkeeping whilst board supporters will gloat, bad accounts will see board suporters rushing for reasons why it's all fine and mini supporters will gloat, indifferent acoounts will see both sides claim victory and bitter arguments will ensue. Anybody want this weekends winning lottery numbers?

[jcb 1,167]

10th of October.

The last day the accounts could be released given a AGM date of 31st.

If the accounts are signed off then that dispels the "second admin" theory favoured by some.

[wrongshapedballs 78]

Thought the accounts were supposed to be out a month before the AGM? Or does it not matter if they are 10 days late?

They have to be out 21 days before the AGM. (Companies Act 2006)

[Guardian 4,281]

There will doubtless be heavy spending, which is hardly unexpected when rebuilding the club from virtually nothing.

However that will be spun into allsorts by the stirrers.

[Ace 3,556]

Thought the accounts were supposed to be out a month before the AGM? Or does it not matter if they are 10 days late?

21 days before AGM is legal minimum.

[woodvale1690 43]

will be interesting the next couple of weeks, let the frenzy begin

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

10th of October.

The last day the accounts could be released given a AGM date of 31st.

If the accounts are signed off then that dispels the "second admin" theory favoured by some.

Not absolutely. It will certainly be good news, but there will be no absolute assurance that we will see out the year, only that we should.

Im interested to see that the projected revenue is realistic and that it should see us over the line with a bit to spare.

[Toad. 2]

They board were asked to have audited accounts out before the AGM, which it looks like they will do.

That gives us 3 wees of going over the accounts before the AGM. If there is anything dodgy there, then it will be found IMO.

very good point Gogzy

[Allanger 625]

Irrespective of the accounts we will have to go back to the markets for additional funding. This imo has always been the case

[RFC55 110,090]

very good point Gogzy

Fuck off

[gogzy 31,195]

Irrespective of the accounts we will have to go back to the markets for additional funding. This imo has always been the case

I think even CG had intended to do a second share issue, i am sure its in both mini and mathers plans.

Fuck off

[elephants stoned 2,994]

Fuck off

He writes Rangers blogs you know

[Zappa 358]

On Thursday 8th August, they told a large room full of fans that the accounts were due mid September, but they were going to try to have them out by the end of August. That was over 7 weeks ago. The end of August has passed and mid September has passed. We're now at the end of September and supposedly being told they'll be out by 10th October which just happens to be the last possible date for them before a 31st October AGM? Is it just because it's a Friday that something smells fishy?