simplythebest 11,453 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Nobody as far as I can see.Good, cause all people are saying it so try and have some positivity. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,934 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 It's an improvement. Nothing more nothing less. I am happy with my stance. No way will I be cuddling up to the men in suits until I see tangible and sustained improvement.and if king came in with his supposed 50million warchest (god i hate that word) and we spent a vast fortune of it including 5million more on the squad for the championship next season, would you be happy at the expenditure being way higher than it would be just nowmaybe not you as such, but a lot of people deriding the board on here while holding on to everyword by king and the others like murray etc simply dont realise that while a big spend to improve our team is a good thing at first, if that money doesnt always come in eventually you'll end up with a shortfallwe spent the 22mill raised in the share option, and that was declared a disaster, whats the difference if we blew 20mill of kings money, or whoevers moneyspunking cash is still spunking cash, the current regime need time to actually cut down the waste spend Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneDavidCooper 2,505 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Good, cause all people are saying it so try and have some positivity.Says you? FFS, heard everything now Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneDavidCooper 2,505 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 and if king came in with his supposed 50million warchest (god i hate that word) and we spent a vast fortune of it including 5million more on the squad for the championship next season, would you be happy at the expenditure being way higher than it would be just nowmaybe not you as such, but a lot of people deriding the board on here while holding on to everyword by king and the others like murray etc simply dont realise that while a big spend to improve our team is a good thing at first, if that money doesnt always come in eventually you'll end up with a shortfallwe spent the 22mill raised in the share option, and that was declared a disaster, whats the difference if we blew 20mill of kings money, or whoevers moneyspunking cash is still spunking cash, the current regime need time to actually cut down the waste spendI questioned the figure of £50 million spending in another thread. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Says you? FFS, heard everything nowWhat? All i've done is tell people to give the board a chance Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennistoun Rangers 426 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 I can't understand how people think it is ok to have a £3.5m loss for 6 month period . we recently had a clean slate with no debt , have filled out the stadium for past 2 seasons , had 20m IPO money but still there isn't a sustainable business being run . The only reason some find it acceptable is that expectations levels were for a much bigger loss .A clean slate? Left with historical infrastructure the size of an EPL club, footballing debts, pay offs all on vastly reduced income.Open your eyes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyson1872 2,923 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 A clean slate? Left with historical infrastructure the size of an EPL club, footballing debts, pay offs all on vastly reduced income.Open your eyes.People don't realise how much it costs to run a club especially under these conditions with the income we are getting Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,934 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 People don't realise how much it costs to run a club especially under these conditions with the income we are gettingthey do, but because it isnt supposed real rangers men in charge they bury their heads up their arses Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OvertonBluenose 40 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 I can't understand how people think it is ok to have a £3.5m loss for 6 month period .we recently had a clean slate with no debt , have filled out the stadium for past 2 seasons , had 20m IPO money but still there isn't a sustainable business being run .The only reason some find it acceptable is that expectations levels were for a much bigger loss .There are 2 reasons we have lost money, We have paid our staff far too much and the season tickets were far too cheap this season. f we keep costs roughly the same in the coming season and increase the season ticket to what it should be, the club will show a slight profit. We are not going to break even until we are back in the top league and challenging for Europe. That was always the case! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickshaw77 287 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 I can't understand how people think it is ok to have a £3.5m loss for 6 month period . we recently had a clean slate with no debt , have filled out the stadium for past 2 seasons , had 20m IPO money but still there isn't a sustainable business being run . The only reason some find it acceptable is that expectations levels were for a much bigger loss .Was far from a clean slate in sfl3Football debts around £3.5mCost of the loan to buy the club £5.5mIpo set up cost £6.1mLegal fees/fines etc must have came to a few millionSigning x amount of players as well after being left with half a dozen or so after relegation.Rangers should be doing better but the club had a huge number of one off costs over the last 18 months as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayesteady 78 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 We are where we are and unfortunately that means lower earning potential through sponsorship, other commercial income and season ticket pricing.The one thing that really pisses me off though is our take from the broadcasting rights, which let's face it is poor in relation to what the pariahs in the so called premiership will receive. No Rangers games to televise and there would never be the same deal on offer to the SPFL.All these haters from the diddy clubs plus the mhanks don't seem to (or won't) realise that their clubs are coining it in due to the famous Glasgow Rangers Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickshaw77 287 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 We are where we are and unfortunately that means lower earning potential through sponsorship, other commercial income and season ticket pricing.The one thing that really pisses me off though is our take from the broadcasting rights, which let's face it is poor in relation to what the pariahs in the so called premiership will receive. No Rangers games to televise and there would never be the same deal on offer to the SPFL.All these haters from the diddy clubs plus the mhanks don't seem to (or won't) realise that their clubs are coining it in due to the famous Glasgow RangersI can't understand why the club has not addressed this as dross like Ross co are making more from the TV deal than Rangers it would seem. Can you imagine Man utd sitting back and taking a smaller amount of TV income from the English fa than the likes Oxford City or Yeovil town? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
285miles 515 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 It's difficult to know who to trust these days but hopefully Wallace is a safe pair of hands who will introduce some stability, at least so that fans are no longer dreading the next headline Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blumhoilann 6,712 Posted March 27, 2014 Share Posted March 27, 2014 Agreed 285,I'm content with this report because we ARE moving in the right direction.I think DK has been told all of this and he sees the improvement hence his intended investment. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallows high 208 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 A clean slate? Left with historical infrastructure the size of an EPL club, footballing debts, pay offs all on vastly reduced income.Open your eyes.Glad you are not running a business I have invested in Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallows high 208 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Was far from a clean slate in sfl3Football debts around £3.5mCost of the loan to buy the club £5.5mIpo set up cost £6.1mLegal fees/fines etc must have came to a few millionSigning x amount of players as well after being left with half a dozen or so after relegation.Rangers should be doing better but the club had a huge number of one off costs over the last 18 months as well.Yes , some avoidable one off costs .The IPO costs shouldn't have exceeded £2m and the Malcolm Murray witch hunt of Green cost £1.5m . Couldn't run a fuckin bath . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 We will never clear this deficit until we Qualify foe European Football.Some people in our Fanbase need to chill out a bit, and when Dave King comes in I would urge people not to expect to blow big Money on big wages please.Calm the fuck Doon. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 I can't understand why the club has not addressed this as dross like Ross co are making more from the TV deal than Rangers it would seem. Can you imagine Man utd sitting back and taking a smaller amount of TV income from the English fa than the likes Oxford City or Yeovil town?Rangers FC should copy right our journey and our TV revenue stream should not be up for negotiation to the SPFL.We should be on much more than any of these diddy clubs.It was a carve up but they better not allow us to be pushed around again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky True Legend 2,682 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Unfortunately we will never have control of television rights as SPFL have beneficial ownership of the fixtures. Unless there is a change in law, we are at their mercy regarding this.Rangers, my team not my project. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.