Jump to content

Are the taigs titles tainted?


Gaz52

Are they tainted?  

244 members have voted

  1. 1. Tainted titles?



Recommended Posts

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

For me it's a yes, if Pepsi saw a way to put Coca cola out of the picture for 4 years by claiming they had cheated by adding some ingredient that they shouldn't have, just so they then would be the leading cola brand while Coca cola fought these lies through the courts. That would be viewed as them exploiting that situation for financial and promotional gain. Of course just like Aberdeen in football terms A G Barr would make noises in being able to challenge Pepsi but they never would do as they just don't have the capabilities.

Like others have said the asterix years should be what they should will be known as, won with no competition

We are all Coca Cola :dance:

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Albertz 78 said:

That lot being given advanced warning about the Juninho EBT right at the time HMRC started looking at Rangers was rather strange as well.

Whyte fails to pay tax for 9 months HMRC does nothing, Hearts fail to pay tax for 28 days and they are given a winding up order?  If HMRC had taken action against Whyte from the first failed payment things might have been different.

Still don't think we'll ever know the 100% truth about what went on but I've no doubt someone at that lot from across the city were involved somehow in what happened.

Bears should remember this when casting their votes and putting power in the wrong hands 

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Albertz 78 said:

That lot being given advanced warning about the Juninho EBT right at the time HMRC started looking at Rangers was rather strange as well.

Whyte fails to pay tax for 9 months HMRC does nothing, Hearts fail to pay tax for 28 days and they are given a winding up order?  If HMRC had taken action against Whyte from the first failed payment things might have been different.

Still don't think we'll ever know the 100% truth about what went on but I've no doubt someone at that lot from across the city were involved somehow in what happened.

Bears should remember this when casting their votes and putting power in the wrong hands 

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, BigJack1690 said:

I couldnt give two fucks if they are tainted or not.

A title is a title.

More important things to worry about, like getting our finger out and challenging them again!

If you were a player from the past who had to work hard for a title would you still be saying that about people who had just been given theirs? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thebluedoo said:

For me it's a yes, if Pepsi saw a way to put Coca cola out of the picture for 4 years by claiming they had cheated by adding some ingredient that they shouldn't have, just so they then would be the leading cola brand while Coca cola fought these lies through the courts. That would be viewed as them exploiting that situation for financial and promotional gain. Of course just like Aberdeen in football terms A G Barr would make noises in being able to challenge Pepsi but they never would do as they just don't have the capabilities.

Like others have said the asterix years should be what they should will be known as, won with no competition

We are all Coca Cola :dance:

Well it's not a sporting competition won by the better football team then 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...