72barca 1,788 Posted March 15, 2021 Share Posted March 15, 2021 How's this for consistency - 'Fuck you Hamilton'? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 22 minutes ago, The Hammer 11 said: An you’ll also find ACAB used by neo nazis and skin heads, it covers a broad spectrum A broad spectrum of poofs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 This is just another attempt by the Union Bairns to look like the hardmen ultras they dream to be. I'm not a big fan of the police, but the ACAB shit is just cringe, never mind the fact that there are plenty of polis who support Rangers. The people they should be targeting are the SFA and the SNP, calling all polis bastards and making it them against us won't do the club or the UBs any favours. Even if you support the message surely people should realize this is just giving out haters more ammunition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 the same group that gives it "no Pyro no party" but never uses Pyro at Ibrox cause they know the polis will lift them 😅 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbertzLoyalRSC 18,084 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 9 minutes ago, Willis said: the same group that gives it "no Pyro no party" but never uses Pyro at Ibrox cause they know the polis will lift them 😅 Have you not shat it and had your account deleted on here a couple of times? Ironic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,604 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 Ah, so @Willis’ real problem is he’s not a fan of the UB. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Hurlock Loyal 12,133 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 1 hour ago, andyhrfc said: What exactly have UB members done (allegedly) to merit such frequent door knocks? Wearing shorts, with jackets on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 5 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said: Ah, so @Willis’ real problem is he’s not a fan of the UB. I actually quite like the UBs these days, disliked them for a good while a few years ago but have totally supported and backed them in recent years I just think they're fucking daft doing this shit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 11 minutes ago, AlbertzLoyalRSC said: Have you not shat it and had your account deleted on here a couple of times? Ironic. Am I shouting ACAB? Or is it that you just don't understand the meaning of the word ironic 😅 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbertzLoyalRSC 18,084 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 4 minutes ago, Willis said: Am I shouting ACAB? Or is it that you just don't understand the meaning of the word ironic 😅 It's like a trafick jam, when you're already late Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 7 minutes ago, AlbertzLoyalRSC said: It's like a trafick jam, when you're already late 😅 A no smooookimg sign on your cigarette break! The song should have been called "a load of minor inconveniences" instead of Ironic 😅 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 And I'm not even going to bring up the "trafick" don't know what the fuck that was about 😅 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theblueoysterbar 19,683 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 20 minutes ago, Willis said: 😅 A no smooookimg sign on your cigarette break! The song should have been called "a load of minor inconveniences" instead of Ironic 😅 Ed Byrne likes this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 At the end of the day the Union Bears seem to act or at least try to act as the representatives of the fanbase, they might claim thats not their intention but thats the way they act and are perceived by some They try to get the club to accommodate them, they make requests to have their section increased and it gets denied Then they go and do shit like this and then wonder why the club doesn't back them? They're shooting themselves in the foot In my opinion they have every right to say whatever they want but they also have to fave criticism and they can't really claim that the Club or the police treat them unfairly when they draw attention to themselves like this when its totally unnecessary. Its just bloody daft and helps no one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TamCoopz 19,605 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 2 hours ago, Willis said: 😅 A no smooookimg sign on your cigarette break! The song should have been called "a load of minor inconveniences" instead of Ironic 😅 Something ironic about naming a song ironic when nothing she suggests in the song is ironic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 5 minutes ago, TamCoopz said: Something ironic about naming a song ironic when nothing she suggests in the song is ironic Nah mate, if the examples in the song had been the opposite of ironic then it would be ironic I think To be honest I've got as much of an idea of what Ironic means as wee Alanis does Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TamCoopz 19,605 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 3 minutes ago, Willis said: Nah mate, if the examples in the song had been the opposite of ironic then it would be ironic I think To be honest I've got as much of an idea of what Ironic means as wee Alanis does Think it’s open to interpretation but that’s for another thread and another day (hopefully not anytime soon) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze 14,580 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 44 minutes ago, Willis said: At the end of the day the Union Bears seem to act or at least try to act as the representatives of the fanbase, they might claim thats not their intention but thats the way they act and are perceived by some They try to get the club to accommodate them, they make requests to have their section increased and it gets denied Then they go and do shit like this and then wonder why the club doesn't back them? They're shooting themselves in the foot In my opinion they have every right to say whatever they want but they also have to fave criticism and they can't really claim that the Club or the police treat them unfairly when they draw attention to themselves like this when its totally unnecessary. Its just bloody daft and helps no one. That’s far to sensible a post for this time in the morning and @TamCoopz do you never sleep ? 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 26 minutes ago, TamCoopz said: Think it’s open to interpretation but that’s for another thread and another day (hopefully not anytime soon) I think a thread like that is just what the OT needs, I'm not starting it though, as ironic as that may or may not be Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 4 minutes ago, KeyserSoze said: That’s far to sensible a post for this time in the morning and @TamCoopz do you never sleep ? 😂 Its only 11.40 in these here parts, that said I'm pished so I appreciate it 😘 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze 14,580 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 2 minutes ago, Willis said: Its only 11.40 in these here parts, that said I'm pished so I appreciate it 😘 Ok. Where’s that then? Ive always assumed you were from Ayrshire funnily enough 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 7 minutes ago, KeyserSoze said: Ok. Where’s that then? Ive always assumed you were from Ayrshire funnily enough 😂 I was untill about a year ago, I'm in the States now, hopefully not for too long Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
72barca 1,788 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 1 hour ago, Willis said: At the end of the day the Union Bears seem to act or at least try to act as the representatives of the fanbase, they might claim thats not their intention but thats the way they act and are perceived by some They try to get the club to accommodate them, they make requests to have their section increased and it gets denied Then they go and do shit like this and then wonder why the club doesn't back them? They're shooting themselves in the foot In my opinion they have every right to say whatever they want but they also have to fave criticism and they can't really claim that the Club or the police treat them unfairly when they draw attention to themselves like this when its totally unnecessary. Its just bloody daft and helps no one. What does probable cause mean in the UK? Probable Cause UK Definition Note: The definition of probable cause in the United Kingdom may differ to other countries. As a rule, having probable cause means police officers can make an arrest based on suspicion. They must believe the probability that a crime got committed and their suspect probably committed it. harassment [həˈrasmənt, ˈherəsmənt] NOUNaggressive pressure or intimidation. "they face daily harassment by the police" Harassment covers a wide range of behaviors of an offensive nature. It is commonly understood as behavior that demeans, humiliates or embarrasses a person, and it is characteristically identified by its unlikelihood in terms of social and moral reasonableness. In the legal sense, these are behaviors that appear to be disturbing, upsetting or threatening. They evolve from discriminatory grounds, and have an effect of nullifying a person's rights or impairing a person from benefiting from their rights. When these behaviors become repetitive, it is defined as bullying. The continuity or repetitiveness and the aspect of distressing, alarming or threatening may distinguish it from insult. What do you mean unnecessary? Don't you think that these guys have the right to shine a light on shoddy police tactics to protect their rights in law? The police are duty bound to follow the laws of the land. Where do they get the authority to harass a person with no probable cause - a crime has to have been committed for them to have suspicions? Their actions smack of harassment -seven times in 48 hrs-, intimidation -threatening to inform the employer-, and issuing unlawful orders -report to the police station. In fact, it just smacks of them doing the will of their political masters - the SNP. Having said that, I don't think anyone of a Rangers leaning should voluntarily visit the midden or its grounds on Sunday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willis 20,919 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 54 minutes ago, 72barca said: What does probable cause mean in the UK? Probable Cause UK Definition Note: The definition of probable cause in the United Kingdom may differ to other countries. As a rule, having probable cause means police officers can make an arrest based on suspicion. They must believe the probability that a crime got committed and their suspect probably committed it. harassment [həˈrasmənt, ˈherəsmənt] NOUNaggressive pressure or intimidation. "they face daily harassment by the police" Harassment covers a wide range of behaviors of an offensive nature. It is commonly understood as behavior that demeans, humiliates or embarrasses a person, and it is characteristically identified by its unlikelihood in terms of social and moral reasonableness. In the legal sense, these are behaviors that appear to be disturbing, upsetting or threatening. They evolve from discriminatory grounds, and have an effect of nullifying a person's rights or impairing a person from benefiting from their rights. When these behaviors become repetitive, it is defined as bullying. The continuity or repetitiveness and the aspect of distressing, alarming or threatening may distinguish it from insult. What do you mean unnecessary? Don't you think that these guys have the right to shine a light on shoddy police tactics to protect their rights in law? The police are duty bound to follow the laws of the land. Where do they get the authority to harass a person with no probable cause - a crime has to have been committed for them to have suspicions? Their actions smack of harassment -seven times in 48 hrs-, intimidation -threatening to inform the employer-, and issuing unlawful orders -report to the police station. In fact, it just smacks of them doing the will of their political masters - the SNP. Having said that, I don't think anyone of a Rangers leaning should voluntarily visit the midden or its grounds on Sunday. The union bears have highlighted none of that with their ACAB post, not a single issue. I don't really care to debate the issue any more I've said my piece But the next time the UBs complain about getting denied permission for marches or the club not extending their section or backing them then they won't have a leg to stand on This may be the day and age where major corporations and even elected officials get behind this nonsense but thankfully Rangers FC at least haven't sunk that low yet The UBs should have realised the baggage a daft post like that carries these days and they'll probably face consequences for it and it'll serve them right Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
72barca 1,788 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 45 minutes ago, Willis said: The union bears have highlighted none of that with their ACAB post, not a single issue. I don't really care to debate the issue any more I've said my piece But the next time the UBs complain about getting denied permission for marches or the club not extending their section or backing them then they won't have a leg to stand on This may be the day and age where major corporations and even elected officials get behind this nonsense but thankfully Rangers FC at least haven't sunk that low yet The UBs should have realised the baggage a daft post like that carries these days and they'll probably face consequences for it and it'll serve them right So your puke-filled post fails to see peoples' rights being violated, and according to you they should not be defended. Muscles are like rights, use them or lose them. Being over the sea and far away means out of sight and out of mind for you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.