BLUEDIGNITY 33,660 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 . . . one to keep and Charlie is one of the favourites to go by all accounts and lets just say off the top of my head Eh I'll pick Bhurkey. Who would you choose ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnGalbraith 0 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Burke or Adam? Id keep Burke. Reluctantly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Lee McCulloch and Charlie Adam - two for the price of one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely 58 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 . . . one to keep and Charlie is one of the favourites to go by all accounts and lets just say off the top of my head Eh I'll pick Bhurkey. Who would you choose ? I bet you get loads of people saying neither. But in the spirit of your question I would keep burke. I think he has far more skill in him than Adam does. Although he does have to produce it more regularly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kplfishtank 4,657 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 id keep burke before adam cause he at least looks like a player when fit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Lee McCulloch Christian Dailly Andy Webster Charlie Adam Chris Burke Jean-Claude Darcheville Kirk Broadfoot Close thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar bear 0 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Burke or Adam? Id keep Burke. Reluctantly. Believe it or not, Adam has far more upside to his game than Burke.Just shows you how useless Burke is eh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,660 Posted December 11, 2008 Author Share Posted December 11, 2008 Lee McCulloch Christian Dailly Andy Webster Charlie Adam Chris Burke Jean-Claude Darcheville Kirk Broadfoot Close thread. To ambitious, keep to the topic ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 I would line both of them up against a wall, with a gun in my hand that only has 2 shots left. Then I would shoot the one I want to get rid off but ''acidentally'' shoot both of them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayboleLoyal_atb 3,731 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Burke. Hes shite to but would rather have him playing on the wing than Charlie Ada nyone else who says any different clearly doesn't have any knowledge of football. They are both pish though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzas_Flute 11 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 As much as i hate the imposter bhurke i would still keep him over Adam. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eastcoastbear 122 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 id keep burke before adam cause he at least looks like a player when fit That would be my line of thought too kpl. What a pishy choice to make though!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
British and Proud 0 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Kirk Broadfoot Close thread. You would get rid of Broadfoot before Whittaker? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edranger 0 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 SDM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,660 Posted December 11, 2008 Author Share Posted December 11, 2008 Bearing in mind Charlie 57 outings 13 goals. bhurkey 95 outings 11 goals ? Charlie was at mirren for a while don't forget ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManchestGer 347 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 I'm glad I'm not making this decision. Burke's looked alright in the reserves recently so on current form I'd have to say Burke to stay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,660 Posted December 11, 2008 Author Share Posted December 11, 2008 I'm glad I'm not making this decision. Burke's looked alright in the reserves recently so on current form I'd have to say Burke to stay So bhurkey has looked alright in the reserves ? How good was he ? were you there ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StunnedGuy 0 Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Burke, without a shadow of a doubt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
strar8 55 Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 If Burke stopped his fairy-like diving anytime an opposition player even comes near him then i'd maybe think about keeping him :2g: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macka1990 0 Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 charlie adam everyday of the week. burke is pish adams is pish with potentail to sort himself out into a decent player Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 Lee McCulloch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddrock 107 Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 wouldnt keep any of them even under pain of death Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
docspiderman 1,234 Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 I would very reluctantly keep Adam; we know that his level of performance is poor but consistent. Burke is an imposter; has never worked on his weaknesses, no heart and little commitment, 3 decent games a year is not worth the wages we pay him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macleod1873 0 Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 Without doubt Burke, a looks in better shape any time ive seen him and can run faster than 5 mph Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts