Canadaready 9,437 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Don't know how to introduce this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersDude90 1 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Someones been a tad harsh me thinks... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOLUWDC 1 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Someones been a tad harsh me thinks... Not harsh enough. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForestDillinger 9 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 McGregor - Had nothing to do, which is sad considering we lost. Perhaps should command his box a bit better. Weir - Done. Pure and simple. Move on. Broadfoot - Keep him at right-back. He's not competent enough for Centre. Best option we have at right-back considering... Whittaker - ... is a shower of shite. Let the pressure get to him. Let the mistakes build up and lost confidence very quickly. Not good enough for Rangers. Papac - Not good enough. I love him as much as the next bear, but he's not good enough. Offers nothing significant going forward and cannot mark for shit in defence. Mendes - I would like to think that he didn't do well because players around him didn't do well, but I'd be lying. He needs to stop shooting at goal, he wastes too many chances that way. Ferguson - Done. Much like Weir. Simply gets in the way and provides nothing significant. No bottle or presence, which is what you need for a captain. Adam - What the fuck has he done in the last 4 months to warrant a place in one of the most important games of the season? It's beyond beleif that he is even considered. Useless. Davis - Our only creative force, but done nothing significant today. Done enough to show that he should be in the middle alongside Mendes though. Miller - Not much to comment on. Didn't do anything. Unfortunately, running around like a headless chicken only works in some games. Not this one. Boyd - He needs service. He didn't get service, therefore he played badly. Had one chance which he took poorly. Not good enough for him. Subs: Lafferty - Showed glimpses of potential, but was never going to be the answer to breaking down the septic bus. Especialy on the left. Novo - Opposition teams know the "Novo spark card" now. It doesn't work. Waste of sub. Walter Smith - Change up your fucking ideas and see some fucking sense. Really. Adam? Novo spark? Lafferty on left? No natural wide players? They didn't work against the likes of St. Mirren, why the fuck would they work against Celtic? Change up or fuck off. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasGers 96 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Davis and Papac stood out for me. I didn't think that either Mendes or Fergie had a particularly good game, and I thought that Whittaker was terrible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersDude90 1 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Its this situation that throws this whole player rater system to fuck... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,556 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Its this situation that throws this whole player rater system to fuck... Not really, when players have poor performances the marks have to be fair. It is over a season, therefore the averages will errr... average out ?!? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart_RFC 41 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 McGregor - 4 Weir - 5 Broadfoot - 3 Whittaker - 2 Papac -3 Mendes - 5 Ferguson - 1 Adam - 2 Davis - 4 Miller - 4 Boyd - 0 Subs: Lafferty - 1 Novo - 2 Walter Smith - 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersDude90 1 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 When i first looked at the results it was far lower than it is now. As poor as some of that performance was, no way did the majority of players deserve 1's and 2's Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,556 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 When i first looked at the results it was far lower than it is now. As poor as some of that performance was, no way did the majority of players deserve 1's and 2's I agree, the problem is when we lose then the anguish of the loss will cloud many peoples judgement into being much harsher than is deserved. As i said before, it is over a seaosn & would hope that it does even itself out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOLUWDC 1 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 When i first looked at the results it was far lower than it is now. As poor as some of that performance was, no way did the majority of players deserve 1's and 2's A lot of people give them 1' and 2's anyway. Even McGregor who could do nothing about the goal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Mendes had an excellent first half, on his way to scoring 8 or 9, but his second half was dire. 6. Davis was indeed our best player overall - 7. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HelloMoto 0 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 They lost and they all deserve a big fat 0. Second place is nothing in this league and these muppets blew it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar bear 0 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 McGregor - 4 Weir - 5 Broadfoot - 3 Whittaker - 2 Papac -3 Mendes - 5 Ferguson - 1 Adam - 2 Davis - 4 Miller - 4 Boyd - 0 Subs: Lafferty - 1 Novo - 2 Walter Smith - 1 When are you guys going to stop overrating Boyd? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 McGregor - 4 Weir - 5 Broadfoot - 3 Whittaker - 2 Papac -3 Mendes - 5 Ferguson - 1 Adam - 2 Davis - 4 Miller - 4 Boyd - 0 Subs: Lafferty - 1 Novo - 2 Walter Smith - 1 When are you guys going to stop overrating Boyd? I think Stuart would have given a negative for Boyd if he'd had that option! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart_RFC 41 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 McGregor - 4 Weir - 5 Broadfoot - 3 Whittaker - 2 Papac -3 Mendes - 5 Ferguson - 1 Adam - 2 Davis - 4 Miller - 4 Boyd - 0 Subs: Lafferty - 1 Novo - 2 Walter Smith - 1 When are you guys going to stop overrating Boyd? I think Stuart would have given a negative for Boyd if he'd had that option! And that would have been a compliment. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar bear 0 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 McGregor - 4 Weir - 5 Broadfoot - 3 Whittaker - 2 Papac -3 Mendes - 5 Ferguson - 1 Adam - 2 Davis - 4 Miller - 4 Boyd - 0 Subs: Lafferty - 1 Novo - 2 Walter Smith - 1 When are you guys going to stop overrating Boyd? I think Stuart would have given a negative for Boyd if he'd had that option! Me and him both. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dado 334 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Davis Ferguson and Mendes only players who got pass marks for me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Davis Ferguson and Mendes only players who got pass marks for me. Despite the pelters Barry's taking around here, I agree with this. Papac did ok as well tbh, and Whittaker wasn't as awful as many are making out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuartm 7 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Who is voting so highly for Papac?? The guy is just not good enough! He cannot attack, and cannot defend!! This has been shown not just in this game, but in pretty much every game this season. Come on guys, start seeing him for what he is! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dado 334 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Davis Ferguson and Mendes only players who got pass marks for me. Despite the pelters Barry's taking around here, I agree with this. Papac did ok as well tbh, and Whittaker wasn't as awful as many are making out. We are screaming out for width, we wouldnt be so critical of the players in the centre if we had an output in the wide positions. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Who is voting so highly for Papac?? The guy is just not good enough! He cannot attack, and cannot defend!! This has been shown not just in this game, but in pretty much every game this season. Come on guys, start seeing him for what he is! He made 3 or 4 excellent blocks and slide tackles today. And a number of good clearances. He certainly wasn't bad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TannochsideBear 355 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 I'm sorry, but Ferguson and Davis were totally overrun by the very poor scum midfield. Mendes was the only one up for the fight in the middle of the park today. Another big game goes right past Davis without a contribution of note. And his role in the short corner that led to their goal was a disgrace. Boyd has missed his only chance, and Miller would have been better today with hoops on. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbo 588 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 McGregor 6- No chance with the goal. Did well to save from a Samaras header. Papac 6- Did his job. Nothing more but he's a centre back. We need Stevie Smith back! Whittaker 5- Some awful passes today. Scrapes pass marks as he defended well. Weir 6- Did his job. Broadfoot 4- Awful for the goal and we badly need a centre back. Adam 5- Was poor should have come off earlier. Mendes 6- Some great passes but awful shooting today. Ferguson 6- Was ok. Great pass through to Miller in the 2nd half. Davis 6- Ok again. One of the better performances. Miller 7- Best player on the park. Chased every ball got in Celtic's faces. Boyd 4- Missed big big chance. Contributed nothing else. Subs: Lafferty 5- Nice touches no end product. Novo 5- Same as Lafferty. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy500 463 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Whittaker deserves a 1. He was awful! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.