nvager 498 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Providing Walter stays with Miller and Boyd up front? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garry88 0 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 playing on the left, I'd say fleck, preferably with naismith upfront with boyd. I'd love to see :fleck: :aaron: :boyd: though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbiemac 0 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 playing on the left, I'd say fleck, preferably with naismith upfront with boyd. I'd love to see :fleck: :aaron: :boyd: though Dream on that will never happen mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garry88 0 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 playing on the left, I'd say fleck, preferably with naismith upfront with boyd. I'd love to see :fleck: :aaron: :boyd: though Dream on that will never happen mate. Unfortunately you're right, but there's no harm in imagining a rangers team full of youth and energy that will attack a team all day. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzGers 425 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 after yesterdays performance, i cant see fleck being dropped for the next game, so it will be up to him to show a level of consistency to warrant inclusion week in week out...however, i have no doubt that if fleck doesnt become a regular starter, he will certainly become a regular player off the bench. Only shame is that it pushes aaron further down the pecking order Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 I'd rather see Fleck and Naismith up front, with Aaron on the left. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Naismith! Fleck did well but he will not be consistent enough to continually play there for a couple of years - Naismith, while still young has that experience! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macleod1873 0 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 On one hand you have a striker. On the other you have someone who looked exremely comfortable playing left mid. Knowing Wattie, fleck wont be near the squad at pittodrie and charlie adam will come in and play Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skins 20 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Naismith! Fleck did well but he will not be consistent enough to continually play there for a couple of years - Naismith, while still young has that experience! Thats a bit rash! How could you possibly know this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbm26896 995 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Fleck excellent yesterday i would like to see Naismith Davis Mendes Fleck as a midfield Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youllneverwinaway 0 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 On one hand you have a striker. On the other you have someone who looked exremely comfortable playing left mid. Knowing Wattie, fleck wont be near the squad at pittodrie and charlie adam will come in and play Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_glasgow 2 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 neither, both upfront, aaron or beasley on the left Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcbear 10,924 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 neither, both upfront, aaron or beasley on the left Beasley for me has been a huge letdown, certainly not him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted January 18, 2009 Author Share Posted January 18, 2009 Fleck excellent yesterday i would like to see Naismith Davis Mendes Fleck as a midfield Yes I like that or maybe Aaron wide right and Naismith up front with Boyd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaD CoW 3 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 I'd like to see Aaron being giving the chance on the left. Fleck up front with Naismith or Boyd, as Miller has been atrocious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted January 18, 2009 Author Share Posted January 18, 2009 I'd like to see Aaron being giving the chance on the left. Fleck up front with Naismith or Boyd, as Miller has been atrocious. Yes, but Walter would have palpitations! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzas_Flute 11 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Naismith! Fleck did well but he will not be consistent enough to continually play there for a couple of years - Naismith, while still young has that experience! What logic are you using to make this very rash statement ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaD CoW 3 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 I'd like to see Aaron being giving the chance on the left. Fleck up front with Naismith or Boyd, as Miller has been atrocious. Yes, but Walter would have palpitations! Is that a bad thing? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Naismith! Fleck did well but he will not be consistent enough to continually play there for a couple of years - Naismith, while still young has that experience! Thats a bit rash! How could you possibly know this? Experience - ask any manager and they will tell you that it never happens - that swhy they are careful with younger players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CottonRunt 978 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 After yestarday it has to be Fleck for the next game. think Naismith could make a good impact from the bench tho, sub for Miller or Boyd perhaps?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Naismith! Fleck did well but he will not be consistent enough to continually play there for a couple of years - Naismith, while still young has that experience! Thats a bit rash! How could you possibly know this? Experience - ask any manager and they will tell you that it never happens - that swhy they are careful with younger players. Are you saying that every 17/18 year old whose played consistently for a team has failed due to inconsistency? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gid 46 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 You don't win anything with kids! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Newells Sexist Army 2 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Tbh seeing how much the midfield has struggled in games since Ferguson's return i would be tempted to go 4-5-1 with both of them starting, one in behind Boyd so that he isn't completely alone, drop Miller. Flood the midfield keep the ball and don't let them get crosses in. Foster at right back today got done time and time again by McGeady. So the left mid really needs to be somebody with a bit of pace that will run at him, not a clogger Adam or McCulloch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbm26896 995 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 after watching Aberdeen defend today - it aint difficult to see they struggle when you get crosses in from the bye line we need width in our team against aberdeen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaD CoW 3 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Naismith! Fleck did well but he will not be consistent enough to continually play there for a couple of years - Naismith, while still young has that experience! Thats a bit rash! How could you possibly know this? Experience - ask any manager and they will tell you that it never happens - that swhy they are careful with younger players. What about Rooney, Fabregas and other youngster that have started playing regularly from 17 onwards? Yes many there are game where they go off the boil, but what player doesn't. So you are telling me they aren't good enough or always inconsistant. OR what about all the reserve games and such that they play? They should want to play in the first team week in and out. Playing games will only help them progress. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts