McBoyd 355 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Why are bears calling bears idiots after a win? Because he clearly has nothing better to do than argue, even after beating the tims. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Theres nothing even funny about it mate, the guy is a tool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkyyy 450 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Mate come on this is getting silly. He was abject and his lack of being able to hold the ball up led to us being forced back into our own half for large spells. I am actually embarrassed for you coming out with nonsense like that. Do you not read what i write? I said he did well when we were playing 4-4-2 early on and scored 2 goals, he even set up one, and after that went quiet up front alone. What is wrong with that, thats a fair assumption i'd say. you are a brainless little hero worshipping idiot. he was pathetic as usual. what did lafferty or naismith do up front that boydy never ? answer = nothing what did boydy do that lafferty & naismith not do? set up a goal Give McBoyd a break ffs hes only giving his opinion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SugarPlum 6 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Mate come on this is getting silly. He was abject and his lack of being able to hold the ball up led to us being forced back into our own half for large spells. I am actually embarrassed for you coming out with nonsense like that. Do you not read what i write? I said he did well when we were playing 4-4-2 early on and scored 2 goals, he even set up one, and after that went quiet up front alone. What is wrong with that, thats a fair assumption i'd say. you are a brainless little hero worshipping idiot. he was pathetic as usual. That's too far. State your opinion if you must but don't disrespect people. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenose_72 198 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Theres nothing even funny about it mate, the guy is a tool. I was laughing at him mate, the guy is being an idiot! I thought Boyd did alright today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Theres nothing even funny about it mate, the guy is a tool. I was laughing at him mate, the guy is being an idiot! I thought Boyd did alright today. Oh right, sorry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsa 3,906 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 In my time supporting rangers i have seen players like johnston, mccoist, hateley, mols, de boer, prso etc line up as a striker for rangers. That fat mess is not fit to lace any of their boots and today it was once again proved. It was hardly the greatest assist, the ball bobbled around and then he made a 8 yard pass in the middle of the park. But that is just the thing isn't it? Many of us are frustrated and bored watching rangers under wally, many of us realise the lack of basic ability in our team. Then there is mcboyd and his like who come on here all excited and full of praise avery time £15,000 a week footballers manage to complete a lay-off. I am as happy as anyone with the result but I fear it will once again mask the huge problems of rangers under wally. We were dominated at Ibrox by an atrocious celtic team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SugarPlum 6 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 In my time supporting rangers i have seen players like johnston, mccoist, hateley, mols, de boer, prso etc line up as a striker for rangers. That fat mess is not fit to lace any of their boots and today it was once again proved. It was hardly the greatest assist, the ball bobbled around and then he made a 8 yard pass in the middle of the park. But that is just the thing isn't it? Many of us are frustrated and bored watching rangers under wally, many of us realise the lack of basic ability in our team. Then there is mcboyd and his like who come on here all excited and full of praise avery time £15,000 a week footballers manage to complete a lay-off. I am as happy as anyone with the result but I fear it will once again mask the huge problems of rangers under wally. We were dominated at Ibrox by an atrocious celtic team. Lots of bears here have seen legends like that line up, so show them a bit of respect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Theres nothing even funny about it mate, the guy is a tool. You're forever putting that emoticon in the same way! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Theres nothing even funny about it mate, the guy is a tool. You're forever putting that emoticon! That was bluenose Thanks for the USEFUL contribution Boab. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Please respect the views of other members/posters even if you do not agree with them. Boyd is a controversial figure but he did lay on a goal today and that is more than some others did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 In my time supporting rangers i have seen players like johnston, mccoist, hateley, mols, de boer, prso etc line up as a striker for rangers. That fat mess is not fit to lace any of their boots and today it was once again proved. It was hardly the greatest assist, the ball bobbled around and then he made a 8 yard pass in the middle of the park. But that is just the thing isn't it? Many of us are frustrated and bored watching rangers under wally, many of us realise the lack of basic ability in our team. Then there is mcboyd and his like who come on here all excited and full of praise avery time £15,000 a week footballers manage to complete a lay-off. I am as happy as anyone with the result but I fear it will once again mask the huge problems of rangers under wally. We were dominated at Ibrox by an atrocious celtic team. ALL EXCITED? Where!?!? I said 'Decent pass by Boyd to set up Miller for the first goal' - thats hardly all excited.. Again with the dross, fair enough you don't rate him, but calling people hero worshippers and brainless is stupid, show some respect and you'll get some back. Come on here and spit bile at people and you won't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsa 3,906 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Please respect the views of other members/posters even if you do not agree with them. Boyd is a controversial figure but he did lay on a goal today and that is more than some others did. People come on here dishing out all kinds of abuse and you are warning me over calling someone an idiot? I respect fellow fans and I am more than capable of debating with them on all things rangers. I do not respect silly little boys like mcboyd who rush on here all excited because his big hero manages to complete a lay-off or closes someone down once in 90 minutes. It is these idiots who keep wally and co in a job. I am sick of listening to supposed suppporters who know very little about football coming on here and spouting nonsense about their pet players. Boyd did not 'lay on' a goal, he completed an 8 yard pass in the middle of the pitch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 People come on here dishing out all kinds of abuse and you are warning me over calling someone an idiot? I respect fellow fans and I am more than capable of debating with them on all things rangers. I do not respect silly little boys like mcboyd who rush on here all excited because his big hero manages to complete a lay-off or closes someone down once in 90 minutes. It is these idiots who keep wally and co in a job. I am sick of listening to supposed suppporters who know very little about football coming on here and spouting nonsense about their pet players. Boyd did not 'lay on' a goal, he completed an 8 yard pass in the middle of the pitch. Supposed supporter? Look, i'm fed up with your shite, you are MR UBER RANGERS are you? You can blatantly see from things i've done on here, videos i've made, history research i've done and the fact i fly 500 miles to watch and photograph the games that i love Rangers, so stop speaking shite. How you can call into question someones support of the club is ridiculous. Silly little boy? I think you're the one acting like a little boy mate, grow up and debate with reason and respect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SugarPlum 6 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Please respect the views of other members/posters even if you do not agree with them. Boyd is a controversial figure but he did lay on a goal today and that is more than some others did. People come on here dishing out all kinds of abuse and you are warning me over calling someone an idiot? I respect fellow fans and I am more than capable of debating with them on all things rangers. I do not respect silly little boys like mcboyd who rush on here all excited because his big hero manages to complete a lay-off or closes someone down once in 90 minutes. It is these idiots who keep wally and co in a job. I am sick of listening to supposed suppporters who know very little about football coming on here and spouting nonsense about their pet players. Boyd did not 'lay on' a goal, he completed an 8 yard pass in the middle of the pitch. McBoyd is a fellow fan. You can't say in one breath you respect fellow fans but then don't respect McBoyd. Regardless of your opinion on Boyd, leave the personal stuff at the door. Don't call people supposed supporters, that's not your call to make. Your personal vendetta is offensive and uncalled for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 358 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Boyd did not 'lay on' a goal, he completed an 8 yard pass in the middle of the pitch. It was a perfect pass that split their high defensive line open enough for Miller to charge through & score, so it wasn't just any old midfield pass. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooper1989 0 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 It'll be backs to the wall anyway. Makes sense to give Kris a chance. A contradiction if I've ever heard one. Aye, in that sense it'd be a 4-5-1 or 4-5-0 leaving Boyd pretty useless. Both of you missed my point. The point being.. we would be defending for long spells -- and might only get one chance. So not a contradiction, and while Boyd is pretty useless most of the time.. he is the one player that can score when given a reasonable chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooper1989 0 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Boyd did not 'lay on' a goal, he completed an 8 yard pass in the middle of the pitch. It was a perfect pass that split their high defensive line open enough for Miller to charge through & score, so it wasn't just any old midfield pass. Agree with that. It was a superb pass. And good control in the first place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Apart from the pass through to Miller he didn't do much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,782 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Apart from the pass through to Miller he didn't do much. I thought he was poor when we switched to 4-5-1. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Apart from the pass through to Miller he didn't do much. I thought he was poor when we switched to 4-5-1. We shouldn't have switched to 4-5-1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Apart from the pass through to Miller he didn't do much. I thought he was poor when we switched to 4-5-1. He was. When Lafferty came on he put himself about and held the ball up well IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 He was. When Lafferty came on he put himself about and held the ball up well IMO. I only saw him hold up the ball a few times, otherwise mostly it was headers to no mans land. I was hoping he'd come on and do what he did with Northern Ireland, but not today sadly, and again, for his height he should be the only man getting the headers, especially in the box. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 He was. When Lafferty came on he put himself about and held the ball up well IMO. I only saw him hold up the ball a few times, otherwise mostly it was headers to no mans land. I was hoping he'd come on and do what he did with Northern Ireland, but not today sadly, and again, for his height he should be the only man getting the headers, especially in the box. He offered more than Boyd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,782 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 As a lone man Lafferty played better than Boyd did. I think Lafferty's lack of games showed after the adreneline wore off, but he looked up for it when he first came on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts