"The price increase has nothing to do with the price increase, it's just called a price increase because we thought that would be familiar to Rangers fans"
Not that I recall but it's a bit embarrassing, Robert on FF saying "I called it Edmiston House because I wanted something synonymous with Rangers".
To be clear I've no issue with them trying to do something with EH as long as it's above board and it's good that the CH documents clarify it's not for profit but I have an issue now with Rangers employing an SLO who clearly thinks Rangers fans button up the back and repeatedly lied about the EH CIC (and is still doing so to this day I believe) by pretending it's nothing to do with Edmiston House
The documentation lodged at companies house states it is for refurbishment and redevelopment of Edmiston house. They now say it ain't and never has been. I don't see how there can be any question that a lie has been told at some point.
Everyone joins in with No Surrender or Blue Sea of Ibrox, or basically as was said earlier, proper songs. No-one joins in with "Owayowayowayoway Jason Holt Andy Halliday" because it's cringey wee boy pish.
Aye, I had a watch of the highlights again on the BBC site and they asked "Was he fouled or did he trip himself up?" Er, third option guys, he's a cheating, diving, prick
You're giving Kris too much credit, this article will be written by someone else on the basis of "What do you think of that Portuguese guy?" "I don't get it" "Thanks Kris"
Is number 1 the "Breach of the peace" of these rules, i.e anything that doesn't fit in but seems serious enough to warrant removal from the pitch? I take it that's the one that would cover a two footed lunge?
I've still not seen the Wes one back, all I've seen is a picture circulating that shows his position a second or so before he actually caught the ball.
Garner one happened right in front of me and I'd say he's lucky. I think if he had protested the ref would have sent him off
When we scored the winner my thoughts were that I'd never seen a referee look so upset, however I quickly remembered that's just what the meltit faced bastart looks like all the time.
Yes it appears to be a bad deal but is some income better than no income?
Furthermore as others have said we may struggle to replace it with a good deal when it expires if we don't have consistent sales to point towards and any company will know there's a risk of a fan group not liking the deal and demanding boycott.
Of course the catch 22 is that if everyone buys then the deal is working for sports direct and then there's little chance of ending it early, although given the pocket change it's costing a billionaire there's little chance of it ending early even with a boycott, unless his fellow shareholders make legal challenges that he isn't operating in their best interests losing money to prove a point.
Have we got to a point where it's noticeably long though? It's 2 and a half weeks since Warburton left. I'm not sure it's that's abnormal for a replacement not to be in by this point.