Howsitgoing

Making that a news story in another country, how much other times have these so called journalists reported on football in Mexico? The guys only played two fucking games!

Just keep sticking your head up your arsehole if you don' believe that the media has an underlying agenda when it comes to us.

Wise up they don't want him near us as the want 10 in a bloody row , most journalists are scum, in fact all journalist are scum. 
Unless  I hear it from Steve Clarke mouth if someone can show me concrete  evidence then I'm not stupid enough to buy into it  
Certain parts off our media wanted us dead or have you forgot this already? 
Let me give you a tip on newspapers ,The only true thing in the papers that you can believe  is the date at the top of the page. The rest is all lies. 

I agree , he and Stevie Clarke I would interview next week and I would give either one the job there and then. 
Our board need to show real ambition and get a decent manager too lay the foundations. They also need to back him to th hilt. They need to get this one right after the worst manager in our history Pedro, ( Yes even worse than Ally).
If the board appoint a donkey We the fans will know and next time we will be demanding they go with the manager as they are to blame for this season. Pedro o should have been sacked the end of last season but yet our board bottled making the tough call and wanted our money on Pena and Herrera .

MPH experience for me makes him less of a gamble. Scottish football does bring about an extra challenge due to the standard compared to what MPH is used too but a coach with the experience he has will easily find a way to counteract that.

He's just about to become our majority shareholder and untouchable, not that he wasn't before, so I doubt he is going anywhere. All a bit too late I'm afraid.
One can only but hope he steps up a gathers the investment needed for us to take the title.

Brown would shit himself

Seven wins v seven losses at home is unacceptable, no matter how anyone tries to dress it up.

Had we had a board who invested in a proven management team, that gap wouldn't exist, nor would we now be vying with Aberdeen for 2nd place.
Unexcusable.

Shite defending and more pathetic finishing from Morelos aside, today has proved how badly we need an experienced manager. At 2-2 with them down to ten men Rodgers makes a change straight away while Murty does fuck all. Bringing Cummings on and putting pressure on them constantly for the last half hour and we would have had a real chance of beating them. I like Murty as a man but we need better, we’ve got decent players and with a couple of new additions we will have a real chance next season but we need a manager with better tactical knowledge to change as the game develops, Murty isn’t that man.

By noticing that the group of fucking idiots are hiding behind a flag and wearing sunglasses inside. There is twats in all circles and defining all Scottish supporters as that group of fucking cowards is wrong. I know non Rangers fans that also support Scotland that would never take this bile with them to Scotland games infact they would join in if it came to sort that 5 insignificant cunts out. 

I really like Pedro the guy, but his results have been completely underwhelming and may just result in him getting the tin tack. What absolutely shouldn't get him the sack is being undermined by a guy who hasn't really kicked a ball in 6 months and can't keep his mouth shut and keeps running to the papers. 
If the board don't back Pedro on this one they're making a monumental mistake, maybe not in the short term but in the long term players effectively trying to get the manager sacked by leaking to the press is a totally unacceptable and unsustainable situation.

So seemingly this is what happened..
pedro: Kenny your 37!ive played you a lot so I think you should take a wee rest - help with the kids and then there's the international break and we will get some more games out of you.
Kenny: I'd rather play. But ok.
the record: Kenny dropped and humiliated. Dressing room lost. celtic are lovely.
RM: Pedro and Kenny oot! 

If there is truth to the rumours that he keeps going to the press against the clubs wishes, then we should sack him for gross misconduct, and move on from this.
Pedro might not be the man going forward, but he is the manager right now, he is in charge.   None of us should be backing Miller over Pedro here IMO.

"B Membership of The League
Relationship between Clubs and the League 
B1 In all matters and transactions relating to the League and Company each Club shall behave towards each other Club and the Company with the utmost good faith.
B2 No Club, either by itself or its Officials, shall by any means whatsoever disparage, belittle, discredit or unfairly criticise any other Club, the Company or the League or the Directors and the directors of any other Club and the Company's and other Club's officers, employees and agents (which shall, for the avoidance of doubt, in the case of the other Club, exclude its supporters).
B3 A Club shall not either during its membership of the League or at any time after its membership has terminated disclose or divulge either directly or indirectly to any person, firm or company whatsoever or otherwise make use of any Confidential Information as to the business or finances of the Company, League or any of its dealings, transactions or affairs or as to any other matters which may come to its knowledge by reason of its membership without the Board's prior written consent save where required by law to statutory and regulatory authorities (including by the Scottish FA in accordance with the Scottish FA Articles) and to such employees of a Club to whom such disclosure is strictly necessary for the purpose of their duties and only then to the extent so necessary."
 
We can even use their own rules.
https://spfl.co.uk/docs/067_324__therulesofthescottishprofessionalfootballleagueasat24july201_1502440056.pdf

Like everyone's fiduciary duty to their income back in 2012? You know when after a couple of seasons sliteyes admitted it cost him club alone £10m quid a season?

"B Membership of The League
Relationship between Clubs and the League 
B1 In all matters and transactions relating to the League and Company each Club shall behave towards each other Club and the Company with the utmost good faith.
B2 No Club, either by itself or its Officials, shall by any means whatsoever disparage, belittle, discredit or unfairly criticise any other Club, the Company or the League or the Directors and the directors of any other Club and the Company's and other Club's officers, employees and agents (which shall, for the avoidance of doubt, in the case of the other Club, exclude its supporters).
B3 A Club shall not either during its membership of the League or at any time after its membership has terminated disclose or divulge either directly or indirectly to any person, firm or company whatsoever or otherwise make use of any Confidential Information as to the business or finances of the Company, League or any of its dealings, transactions or affairs or as to any other matters which may come to its knowledge by reason of its membership without the Board's prior written consent save where required by law to statutory and regulatory authorities (including by the Scottish FA in accordance with the Scottish FA Articles) and to such employees of a Club to whom such disclosure is strictly necessary for the purpose of their duties and only then to the extent so necessary."
 
We can even use their own rules.
https://spfl.co.uk/docs/067_324__therulesofthescottishprofessionalfootballleagueasat24july201_1502440056.pdf

"S.R: We have listened to everybody. That’s not to diminish the points made by celtic. I have a lot of respect for Peter (Lawwell) and I understand why he’s doing what he’s doing. He has a fiduciary duty to do what is the best interests of celtic."
 
Raegan is wrong with this statement, they've went way past any fiduciary duty.

This from sfa's rule book is better. Acknowledging a statutory duty, none the less!
"Section 5 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 creates a statutory duty to report any suspicions of child abuse i.e. a duty to do what is reasonable in all the circumstances to safeguard the child's health, development and welfare. Failure to report concerns, turning a blind eye or failing to protect a child may result in legal action."
 

"S.R: We have listened to everybody. That’s not to diminish the points made by celtic. I have a lot of respect for Peter (Lawwell) and I understand why he’s doing what he’s doing. He has a fiduciary duty to do what is the best interests of celtic."
 
Raegan is wrong with this statement, they've went way past any fiduciary duty.

Really time for our board to grow a spine and give it all out attack on these rhabid bastards in the east end and bury them.
Their rancid fans may be giving it large, but they are actually on the back foot, being them and only them trying to pursue their bilious agenda. They are seeing this slip away from them. They have no backing. They are outed. They have worked themselves up to a frenzy watching their cause go down the toilet, so come on scum fc, let the whole world see you making a total cunt of yourselves yet again.
A strong but mindfully worded statement from the board should do it. Both defending our position and reinforcing all that is in the public domain about them' ie. the child abuse, the offshore film schemes, GCC grants and so on. Let us demand the game be cleaned up and no cover ups.
Now let us all see who will fall!
 

"S.R: We have listened to everybody. That’s not to diminish the points made by celtic. I have a lot of respect for Peter (Lawwell) and I understand why he’s doing what he’s doing. He has a fiduciary duty to do what is the best interests of celtic."
 
Raegan is wrong with this statement, they've went way past any fiduciary duty.

The offence is not reporting it, would the court case of 1997 not have been the perfect time. Atleast  one of their paedos escaped justice because of their silence.

This from sfa's rule book is better. Acknowledging a statutory duty, none the less!
"Section 5 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 creates a statutory duty to report any suspicions of child abuse i.e. a duty to do what is reasonable in all the circumstances to safeguard the child's health, development and welfare. Failure to report concerns, turning a blind eye or failing to protect a child may result in legal action."