With Heart and Hand

What folk need to realise is that your average punter doesn't really care about many of the issues we debate on here, everything on here is an exaggeration of what your average bear feels, most folk I know think all forums are full of dafties, and for the most part they are correct

What folk need to realise is that your average punter doesn't really care about many of the issues we debate on here, everything on here is an exaggeration of what your average bear feels, most folk I know think all forums are full of dafties, and for the most part they are correct

Yeah I agree but the point that i was making is issues like this one will get 20 and 30 page threads that last days but if it was just punters in a pub it would be a short conversation that's then pretty much forgot about, your average punter doesn't dwell on the boardroom and off-field stuff to anywhere near the extent it gets discussed on here. And the level of infighting and arguments on forums is much higher on forums than it is in real life, it's obviously down to the fact people are anonymous on here
But when you look at discussion on here, for example boycotts or the media etc, based on forums you'd think those were some of the most important issues to Bears but if you listened to real conversations in the pub then it would be a different story

What folk need to realise is that your average punter doesn't really care about many of the issues we debate on here, everything on here is an exaggeration of what your average bear feels, most folk I know think all forums are full of dafties, and for the most part they are correct

What folk need to realise is that your average punter doesn't really care about many of the issues we debate on here, everything on here is an exaggeration of what your average bear feels, most folk I know think all forums are full of dafties, and for the most part they are correct

Sorry that we're not all on your intellectual level

What folk need to realise is that your average punter doesn't really care about many of the issues we debate on here, everything on here is an exaggeration of what your average bear feels, most folk I know think all forums are full of dafties, and for the most part they are correct

Your wisdom has been sorely missed on here recently sir.
A blogger with Rangers at heart and ethics and morals by the bucket load.
Welcome back.

Juan Guy strikes again

And there it is
So you slated Gazza a Rangers legend and C1872 because some folk online had a go at you?

Reeks of self righteousness
"I want people to read what I say but don't want to hear criricisms"
That's being full of yourself to the point of delusion

Reeks of self righteousness
"I want people to read what I say but don't want to hear criricisms"
That's being full of yourself to the point of delusion

Reeks of self righteousness
"I want people to read what I say but don't want to hear criricisms"
That's being full of yourself to the point of delusion

I think it's a bit pathetic for a so called journalist to claim his tweets aren't made partially for publicity and are completely separate from their journalistic opinions
You've been well caught out, the fact you pretend that "anonymous arseholes" opinions are irrelevant when without "anonymous arseholes" you'd be out of a job

So when you had all those instances to refer to then why did you choose to bring up an ex Ger from 20 years ago?

One tweet, jeezo.
Did it upset you? You saw that and thought "What a cunt having a go at Sky for using a racist tarrier in an advert, I'm going to go have a go at a guy with a mental illness who played for Rangers 20 years ago". Am I right?
Says it all about you pal.

I think it's a bit pathetic for a so called journalist to claim his tweets aren't made partially for publicity and are completely separate from their journalistic opinions
You've been well caught out, the fact you pretend that "anonymous arseholes" opinions are irrelevant when without "anonymous arseholes" you'd be out of a job

And there it is
So you slated Gazza a Rangers legend and C1872 because some folk online had a go at you?

I'll ask you again, Instead of clutching at straws to make Rangers fans look like hypocrites for loving Gazza why didn't you highlight the blatant hypocrisy of celtic having a campaign saying Love Celtic Hate Racism when they are currently employing a racist?
Instead of having a go at our rivals you purposely for no real reason brought Rangers and Bears into it implying we support racists?

And there it is
So you slated Gazza a Rangers legend and C1872 because some folk online had a go at you?

He'll be adding this thread to his CV when he applies to work for other taig media outlets 

This. There's a big difference between supporting Rangers and being a Bear or "one of us"

This. There's a big difference between supporting Rangers and being a Bear or "one of us"

Reeks of self righteousness
"I want people to read what I say but don't want to hear criricisms"
That's being full of yourself to the point of delusion