the goal machine 7,820 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 good match but we should have wonSounds like it, which makes it that much harder to take.Can't believe Bazza missing from 6 yds, then the double post hit. :ph43r: :ph43r: :ph43r: it was so annoying Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie! 8 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 bazzas miss was unbelievable it was all "heart in mouth" stuff! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delparlane 5,753 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 It would be SOOO sweet to hammer those bassas at CP next time. <pbag> <pbag> <pbag> Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 A much better 2nd half and we SHOULD have won the game.We still lack some ingenuity in m/field. We are too obvious most of the time. Our srikers, Boyd apart, lack composure when shooting on goal.The defence was much better in the 2nd half and BF excelled throughout.If we can get a really good CH, another m/fielder, a striker and a winger - we have a chance of being an excellent team.Our fullbacks do need to learn to cut out crosses EARLY.Overall a much better than usual OF performance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadaready 9,437 Posted December 17, 2006 Author Share Posted December 17, 2006 Just up, what was the final score Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie! 8 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 1-1should have hammered the fookers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeAndMyWeePalJoe 17 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 A much better 2nd half and we SHOULD have won the game.We still lack some ingenuity in m/field. We are too obvious most of the time. Our srikers, Boyd apart, lack composure when shooting on goal.The defence was much better in the 2nd half and BF excelled throughout.If we can get a really good CH, another m/fielder, a striker and a winger - we have a chance of being an excellent team.Our fullbacks do need to learn to cut out crosses EARLY.Overall a much better than usual OF performance. Agreed nvager. Although I thought Svensson put in a decent shift for his first OF game, except for his part in their goal. He even had a reasonable pop at goal himself... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Agreed my wee pal J. Agreed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 My ratings:AM: 7 Error for the goal but was sound enough besides.Hutton: 8 His best Rangers performance (apart from some wild distribution) in ages. Defensively excellent.Smith: 5.5 I found him poor all round and feel slightly vindicated in not rating him like everyone else seems to. Should have conceded a penalty.Svensson: 8 Simply excellent. Could develop into a fine player at this rate.Hemdani: 7 Usual from him, including the goal.Adam: 6.5 Well involved and no lack of effort. Lacked finesse though.Clement: 7 Ran all over the place and showed great heart.Ferguson: 9 Mercurial in the first half, although dropped out a little in the second. Will be scunnered by his miss.Sionko: 6 Average, and no more. Gave us hee haw.Novo: 7 Did pretty well and nearly scored one a few occasions.Prso: 6 Usual work ethic but off the pace and not offering the guile he used to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted E Bayer 490 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 My ratings:AM: 7 Error for the goal but was sound enough besides.Hutton: 8 His best Rangers performance (apart from some wild distribution) in ages. Defensively excellent.Smith: 5.5 I found him poor all round and feel slightly vindicated in not rating him like everyone else seems to. Should have conceded a penalty.Svensson: 8 Simply excellent. Could develop into a fine player at this rate.Hemdani: 7 Usual from him, including the goal.Adam: 6.5 Well involved and no lack of effort. Lacked finesse though.Clement: 7 Ran all over the place and showed great heart.Ferguson: 9 Mercurial in the first half, although dropped out a little in the second. Will be scunnered by his miss.Sionko: 6 Average, and no more. Gave us hee haw.Novo: 7 Did pretty well and nearly scored one a few occasions.Prso: 6 Usual work ethic but off the pace and not offering the guile he used to. Couldn't argue with any of those rating.I think the two subs gave nothing to the game though I'd like to add. Buffel pulled out of one challenge though which he always seems to do a few times in a match. Fkin poof! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dillinger 0 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Hi Guys (wve) ,On the whole I thought it was it was a decent performance. Rangers deserved a point and, on any other day, can you imagine twice being denied by the woodwork The fight shown by most players was the most pleasing aspect, apart from one spell how many times we we winning the second balls? <pbag> A few dodgy moments in defence but we kept Celtic at arms length. Praise for the CB's, Hutton, Clement and Ferguson although IMO most of team played quite well.With a little more experience and some shrewd transfer deals, we might be able to start building from this result. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BABearacus 4 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 we had enough good chances to bury the bheggars.And that one in the last minute - it had to be sebo didnt it - then when it went to dado and he took forreeeeeeeeeevvvvvveeerrrrrrr to hit in possibly the tamest shot ive seen in my lifebest OF performance from Barry in a couple of years nowhutton put in a great full back performance, stevie smith had his worst game as a professional footballer, adam and sionko gave nothing for usnovo and prso are still my in my opinion the best front two partnership we've got Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sneddon 6 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 it there a link for the goals up yet anyone know? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR 1,480 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Haha! Just came on and read this thread from the start - its funny seeing people goin thru the emotions once you knw the score Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jelle1880 317 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Only was able to see the last 15 minutes of the game, glad to see the goal though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebiggerfella 0 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Just in from work,so didnt see the game,so thanks for that , it was great reading bears. Just seen the goals and quite a few Gers chances on the news. They are nowhere near as good as they think they are, and are due a doing shortly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_RFC87 761 Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 Just in from work,so didnt see the game,so thanks for that , it was great reading bears. Just seen the goals and quite a few Gers chances on the news. They are nowhere near as good as they think they are, and are due a doing shortly. absolutly mate (spl) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadaready 9,437 Posted February 2, 2007 Author Share Posted February 2, 2007 Welcome to your new Invision Power Board!This is simply a test message confirming that the installation was successful.You can remove this message, topic, forum or even category at any time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueben_d 40 Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 i think this thread is broken Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts