Thermopylae 15,288 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 No contact and the guy threw his head back ... Lafferty was vilified for less Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allzo 91 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Why not appeal the day before the old firm game? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 I can't see where Miller threw a punch, the left arm went down, no punch there, and the right arm, the one that Dods faked hitting him, was not even a puch or slap. He had his fingers spread out. We'll see after the appeal! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo. 952 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Fuck right off. Me and everyone beside me, thought that was the ref's chance to make an impact on the game. Anywhere else on the park, you're lucky to get a booking. Cunt ref took his chance where he could. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy 69 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 I can't see where Miller threw a punch, the left arm went down, no punch there, and the right arm, the one that Dods faked hitting him, was not even a puch or slap. He had his fingers spread out. We'll see after the appeal! Watch it again, the left arm is the one he trys hitting him with, his fist is clenched and his right arm dosnt move. EDIT: I know what your talking about, you see it in the Slow mo after that bit your on about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tayside 295 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Never a red card , never made contact and that big hammer thrower makes the most of it , but what do you expect from that ref , he is a well known beast as are his family Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 I can't see where Miller threw a punch, the left arm went down, no punch there, and the right arm, the one that Dods faked hitting him, was not even a puch or slap. He had his fingers spread out. We'll see after the appeal! Watch it again, the left arm is the one he trys hitting him with, his fist is clenched and his right arm dosnt move. Darren Dods was more of a punch, and it hit Miller on the top of the chest - why no red card, violent conduct! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy 69 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 I can't see where Miller threw a punch, the left arm went down, no punch there, and the right arm, the one that Dods faked hitting him, was not even a puch or slap. He had his fingers spread out. We'll see after the appeal! Watch it again, the left arm is the one he trys hitting him with, his fist is clenched and his right arm dosnt move. Darren Dods was more of a punch, and it hit Miller on the top of the chest - why no red card, violent conduct! That isnt even a punch or a slap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 I can't see where Miller threw a punch, the left arm went down, no punch there, and the right arm, the one that Dods faked hitting him, was not even a puch or slap. He had his fingers spread out. We'll see after the appeal! Watch it again, the left arm is the one he trys hitting him with, his fist is clenched and his right arm dosnt move. Darren Dods was more of a punch, and it hit Miller on the top of the chest - why no red card, violent conduct! That isnt even a punch or a slap. About as much of a punch/slap as Miller, and if the referee had seen that from a certain angle, then could well have acted! Still never a red card for Miller, any referee who gives that, is a fucking idiot! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,838 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/scotland/8435647.stm BBC have a dedicated video for it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeirFleckNRothen 1,789 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 He's a fucking walloper, he gave the ref the oppertunity to give him a straight red. That gargoyle Dods made the most of it, but what's Miller playing at? There was no need for him to throw a wee tantrum, he's got the experience to know that. I hope we appeal it to ensure that he'll make the Paedodome, but I highly doubt that it'll be over-turned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black 0 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Miller tried to hit him, so it won't be changed ... IMO, of course. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A1bertzTheOriginal 0 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Miller tried to hit him, so it won't be changed ... IMO, of course. For Miller to play...Ref needs to look at th evidence(tv) and say that he may have been wrong. Only if he does that can Miller play pending review panel overturning the decision. This I assume has to happen tomorrow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo. 952 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/scotland/8435647.stm BBC have a dedicated video for it That is fucking pathetic, I've seen much worse treated with a booking. Ref fancied the limelight. Simple as. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluenoseGaz 27 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 He's a fucking walloper, he gave the ref the oppertunity to give him a straight red. That gargoyle Dods made the most of it, but what's Miller playing at? There was no need for him to throw a wee tantrum, he's got the experience to know that. I hope we appeal it to ensure that he'll make the Paedodome, but I highly doubt that it'll be over-turned. Are you being serious? if so , your in the wrong forum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Walter Smith seem's to think there is a case to be heard! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colin 18 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 IMO the only cunts that think Kenny deserved a red card are the scum from across the city, cmon tae fuck, if this was a red card then every SPL game should have 3 or 4 sendings off per game. I don't understand any bears saying Kenny deserved a red card. The same bears probably think big Ben deserved to be sin-died as well, cmom WATP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CottonRunt 1,024 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Dont think it should have been a red, but im 90% sure that it wont be overturned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,288 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Miller tried to hit him, so it won't be changed ... IMO, of course. Merely a gesture ... no intention there whatsoever Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,710 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Can we appeal and get him back before Sunday - I mean is it at all possible? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersDude90 1 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 All we need to do is appeal, whether it gets overturned or not is irrelevant as it wont be heard till after the celtic match. Its the same as them appealing Loovens' ban for his assault on Edu, they had no chance of it being overturned but they had no fit centre halfs to play against Aberdeen. I don't think it should have been a red, if they were standing up and he done that it probably wouldnt even have been a booking. Saying that, I really doubt it will be overturned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 in the EPL both sets of players would've been spoken to by the ref, to defuse the hand bags situation, in the spl its a straight red. in the games where dodds has tried to mame rangers players in the past and nothing was done about it, at ibrox two yards in front of the linesman, a 50/50 tussle with vignal and camara, vignal gets the ball and a henri blatantly kicks vignal right in the knee cap and nothing was done about it. never a red Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersDude90 1 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Something Boyd said on the radio was interesting too... Chick asked him what he seen of the incident and he said it was just a tangle (or something). He then said he asked Dodds and he said it was because of a punch but when he asked Willie Collum he said he sent him off for the kick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
paisley1967 11 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 We will appeal so this will make him available for Celtic game don't care what the final decision is on the colour of the card it's the Celtic game that counts . Don't care if he get's suspended after that. :21: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 now correct me if i'm wrong, if miller had smacked dodds like people are saying on here, he would have had a bloody nose, if miller smacked him with a boot then dodds would have had stud marks on his face. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts