Thermopylae 15,287 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Miller would have to have 6 feet long arms to have punched him (and that would make him 13 feet tall ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 now correct me if i'm wrong, if miller had smacked dodds like people are saying on here, he would have had a bloody nose, if miller smacked him with a boot then dodds would have had stud marks on his face. You are just being picky with all that physical evidence nonsense Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 now correct me if i'm wrong, if miller had smacked dodds like people are saying on here, he would have had a bloody nose, if miller smacked him with a boot then dodds would have had stud marks on his face. You are just being picky with all that physical evidence nonsense i have more, but i need to run to the shit house....thats what irn bru does to you Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 SNAP! ... drinking the same here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 I think that has an excellent chance of being overturned, or reduced to a yellow. It's well worth an appeal. IMO it isn't cheeky or gamesmanship asking to appeal it. If we appeal it, does it allow him to play at the piggery? Or would the decision be made before Sunday? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILoveGlasgowRangers 0 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Its not clear enough if he makes contact with his hand so theres no proof he did. Should be lifted imo .. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,708 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Its not clear enough if he makes contact with his hand so theres no proof he did. Should be lifted imo .. Unless the ref saw it from his angle, any contact that was or was not made is blocked by Millers leg but his arm does go towards dodds face, its just that after miller moves his legs dodds reacts late Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flecky1 4 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 a quick appeal will change that the clip is on bbc now im expecting him to play v celtic we all should, every other team in the spl appeals to get players played in important games, why cant we? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersDude90 1 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 It doesn't matter if contact was made, its about intent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 It doesn't matter if contact was made, its about intent. so by that, dodds will be suspended then and miller will be able to play Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,009 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 It doesn't matter if contact was made, its about intent. so by that, dodds will be suspended then and miller will be able to play no doubt dods is a cheating cunt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,684 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Just watched it, never an ordering off. If any cunt SHOULD be sent off it's that thug Dodds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,658 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Dirty wee bhead rhattlin ref got what he wanted, fcuk us up for Sunday but fcuk 'im Walter Smith's Blue and White Army are comin ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahamteuchter 1 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Thats never a red. Its more a tangle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 It doesn't matter if contact was made, its about intent. What intent ... if you watch the clip dodds head doesn't jerk back until 3.05 and by then Miller is lying on his back making a punch impossible ... so how can you be red carded for intending the impossible ... if these are to be the rules then it really will be fantasy football Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrblue 0 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Theres no chance that is getting overturned. My only hope is that if we appeal it will allow Miller to play in the Old Firm game. However, the Tims would go mental, so dont see it happening. One things for sure, Mcculloch should snap that cunt Dods in two the next time we play them. The way that prick dived for the sending off had me fooled, I thought Miller had hooked him! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
feda16 136 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Its a red i think, his arm catches him, appeal have him available for old firm then take the 2 match ban for it. Still WE ONLY NEED 10 MEN!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 He'll play against Celtic. Boyd and Miller romp to 5 goals against Celtic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antwilhar 4 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Punched him square on the beak with a hammer fist. clever, very clever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewiegriffin 0 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Theres no chance that is getting overturned. My only hope is that if we appeal it will allow Miller to play in the Old Firm game. However, the Tims would go mental, so dont see it happening. One things for sure, Mcculloch should snap that cunt Dods in two the next time we play them. The way that prick dived for the sending off had me fooled, I thought Miller had hooked him! We dont make the rules and they cant be changed mid season so appealing would free him up to play, ive said we should have a system like england were decisions are made that week but we dont so the SFA are happy with the system and we should use it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,009 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Theres no chance that is getting overturned. My only hope is that if we appeal it will allow Miller to play in the Old Firm game. However, the Tims would go mental, so dont see it happening. One things for sure, Mcculloch should snap that cunt Dods in two the next time we play them. The way that prick dived for the sending off had me fooled, I thought Miller had hooked him! We dont make the rules and they cant be changed mid season so appealing would free him up to play, ive said we should have a system like england were decisions are made that week but we dont so the SFA are happy with the system and we should use it. The sole instigators of integrity in football have used the same 'appealling' tactic in the past so fuck them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,658 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Never a sending off, that cnut dods should be done for play acting, cheatin cnut ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,009 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Never a sending off, that cnut dods should be done for play acting, cheatin cnut ! As I said somewhere else BD, lafferty got hauled over the coals for something similar. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,658 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Never a sending off, that cnut dods should be done for play acting, cheatin cnut ! As I said somewhere else BD, lafferty got hauled over the coals for something similar. Aye wan law for Rangers and wan law for another. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumshie 205 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 We should definitely appeal against it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts