Dietspam 733 Posted May 6, 2010 Share Posted May 6, 2010 Sorry, we can't afford to carry passengers. Maybe if he was on a pay as you play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckGer 0 Posted May 6, 2010 Share Posted May 6, 2010 Italy aren't a club.And I have Italian family.Sorry Scott. Then I totally understand you cheering for Italy. Enjoy the WC! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterD 7,446 Posted May 6, 2010 Share Posted May 6, 2010 Doesn't change my view, he should still be for the off, 12k a week or something he's on, with a wage cut it would still be to much to pay someone who hardly ever plays, he's been a waste of wages for years, time to free them up and get someone else in Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theweebluenose 4,335 Posted May 6, 2010 Share Posted May 6, 2010 Went through a decent spell earlier in the season but far too prone to injury and I can't ever see him becoming a regular in the first team, nice to see him offering but no use in him staying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbm1989 41 Posted May 6, 2010 Share Posted May 6, 2010 like the guy but hes pretty gash tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffbear 4,106 Posted May 6, 2010 Share Posted May 6, 2010 He's better than Naismith Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antwilhar 4 Posted May 6, 2010 Share Posted May 6, 2010 This suggests his agent is struggling to find him a new club and he doesnt want to go back to MLS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulRFC1 115 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 its hard for the guy when wasters like Naismith and Lafferty are playing on the left ahead of him.He should be kept and played more but he wont be and we will keep the likes of Naismith and play him on the left.dont agreemore like he is the wasterhes had a few games and then has done nothing!hes a lightweight who should be sold in the summerHe hardly gets a game when he is fitHe is a superb player when fit and playing but its almost impossible to see him playing because Walter plays strikers on the wingHe had a few games and done nothing ? has anyone done anything when they have played on the left ? he has had more good games than Naismith and Lafferty out there and it doesn't help when he said he prefers playing on the rightLightweight ? so you want our wingers to be built on strength ? how good they can tackle and defend ? I fucking hate our fans when it comes to wingers, always wanting a winger that can tackle and be strong Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 its hard for the guy when wasters like Naismith and Lafferty are playing on the left ahead of him.He should be kept and played more but he wont be and we will keep the likes of Naismith and play him on the left.dont agreemore like he is the wasterhes had a few games and then has done nothing!hes a lightweight who should be sold in the summerHe hardly gets a game when he is fitHe is a superb player when fit and playing but its almost impossible to see him playing because Walter plays strikers on the wingHe had a few games and done nothing ? has anyone done anything when they have played on the left ? he has had more good games than Naismith and Lafferty out there and it doesn't help when he said he prefers playing on the rightLightweight ? so you want our wingers to be built on strength ? how good they can tackle and defend ? I fucking hate our fans when it comes to wingers, always wanting a winger that can tackle and be strongAs I said earlier, only in the SPL is it acceptable to judge a winger on their strength in the tackle - we're a backwards footballing nation.As for Beasley being a waster? Don't see it. He suffers the 'Fleck syndrome' of one bad game and he's dropped for four months, while the likes of Lafferty, Naismith, McCulloch and Papac can have several bad games in a row and still be some of the first names on the team sheet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 if he has a good world cup (if he plays) then its pretty much a given somebody will buy him, i just wish sionko had been given a chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 He's performed no worse than our new 'undroppable' Naismith this year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulRFC1 115 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 its hard for the guy when wasters like Naismith and Lafferty are playing on the left ahead of him.He should be kept and played more but he wont be and we will keep the likes of Naismith and play him on the left.dont agreemore like he is the wasterhes had a few games and then has done nothing!hes a lightweight who should be sold in the summerHe hardly gets a game when he is fitHe is a superb player when fit and playing but its almost impossible to see him playing because Walter plays strikers on the wingHe had a few games and done nothing ? has anyone done anything when they have played on the left ? he has had more good games than Naismith and Lafferty out there and it doesn't help when he said he prefers playing on the rightLightweight ? so you want our wingers to be built on strength ? how good they can tackle and defend ? I fucking hate our fans when it comes to wingers, always wanting a winger that can tackle and be strongAs I said earlier, only in the SPL is it acceptable to judge a winger on their strength in the tackle - we're a backwards footballing nation.As for Beasley being a waster? Don't see it. He suffers the 'Fleck syndrome' of one bad game and he's dropped for four months, while the likes of Lafferty, Naismith, McCulloch and Papac can have several bad games in a row and still be some of the first names on the team sheet.Couldn't agree moreI dont get how our fans complain about lack of width etc and when we actually have a player that can play on the wing he isnt strong enough or he cant tackle or another good one that usually comes up is he doesn't stick his head in where it hurtsOnly in Scotland ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
supermac 115 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 Beasley pay as you play I can't see him at the world cup unless he's in the stand supporting Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOLUWDC 1 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 I would keep him.He's better than any other wide man in the SPL, he just doesn't get a run of games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozblue 4,332 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 He's certainly no worse than Naismith but why keep a player if he's not even going to be on the subs bench a lot of the times.Get rid of both of them and bring in somebody who can do a job for us on a weekly basis. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozblue 4,332 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 Unfortunately he's injury prone and too lightweight. We need a winger that can bully defenders off the ball to send in a cross and it's a shame that Beasley never managed that as he showed in December he has a great deal of skill when on form.How many true wingers bully defenders off the ball? They win their battles through speed, skill and trickery. The great Alan Morton was only five feet, four inches.Willie Henderson wasn't described as"WEE" for nothing either,as he was only 5'4" or there abouts.Alex Scott was 5'10" but could never be described as somebody who could "Bully" a fullback.Probably the biggest winger we ever had to my recollection would be Ted McMinn.If somebody can remember a bigger winger than the "Tin Man", I'd be happy to know who it was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoghurto 9 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 At least he has something to fall on to, if this whole football thing doesn't really work out anymore:http://www.thedamarcuscollection.com/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 TBH he plays so rarely it would be months before we would even realise he had gone Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam_RFC 238 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 al be happy once he goes dont rate him at all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 It's hard to believe that a young healthy guy with a talent for the game has such little appetite for playing it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muz333 361 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 I'd rather we spent the money on a winger with not only pace but a bit of strength about them so they can bully full backs off the ball and stay on their feet long enough to put the cross in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 Move him on in the summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 Great news. We'd be off our heads to offer him a new deal - he doesn't deserve one.Good player on his day, however that day doesn't come along that often, and he's far too inconsistant, and injury-prone.Spends most of his time picking himself up after either being knocked over, slipping in his boots, or tripping over the ball... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts