Gillete 1,338 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Say the blue knights , a consortium from japan and a wealthy American all show they have the finance (for talking sake)Who decides who gets to buy the club ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam2102 579 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 administrators, based on who has the best long term plan and short term finance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillete 1,338 Posted March 11, 2012 Author Share Posted March 11, 2012 CoolSo if someone has the more wealth , it won't be based just on that but having the structure and plans to take the club forward Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmyblue75 20 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Thankfully not sdm! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stampyurie 203 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Peter liewell and the spl Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,889 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Thankfully not sdm! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougie76 15,359 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Dont trust the admin for the simple fact that whyte hand picked them. whyte/admin/ ticketus all in bed togther and rangers are going to suffer if we let them away with it, hope lm wrong but this whole thing stinks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dardo54 11 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Dont trust the admin for the simple fact that whyte hand picked them. whyte/admin/ ticketus all in bed togther and rangers are going to suffer if we let them away with it, hope lm wrong but this whole thing stinks.soundin a bit like leggo Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Negri's Beard 1,423 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Dont trust the admin for the simple fact that whyte hand picked them. whyte/admin/ ticketus all in bed togther and rangers are going to suffer if we let them away with it, hope lm wrong but this whole thing stinks.True, he did pick them but they seem to be laying into Craig Whyte daily, telling all and sundry that he's never going to be back at Rangers and telling us that he doesn't even have any claim over the club whatsoever. Why would they do that if they were in cahoots with him?As for the OP, I would assume that with all the bids, one will stand out over another, considering how many diffiirent complexities there must be in buying a club. The one which is most advantageosu to the long term future of Rangers will be picked...in theory at least Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
californiadreamin52 339 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Carlos Slim Helu any chance he`ll make a bid or I`d even settle for Bill Gates Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 109,653 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Dont trust the admin for the simple fact that whyte hand picked them. whyte/admin/ ticketus all in bed togther and rangers are going to suffer if we let them away with it, hope lm wrong but this whole thing stinks.Ouch it must be fucking sore Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Whichever group offers the best deal for our creditors. Clark has already made it clear that future financing has nothing to do with them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky_ 893 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 i still dont understand the position of craig whyte.if i purchase 83% of shares in a company but struggle to deal with the debt, and then put the business in administration - does that mean the administrators can just sieze my shares and sell them on to who they see fit, without my say?not that complaining - i'd rather have a consortium of businessmen, who are transparent about what businesses they own and hwo they made their money, rather than cloack & dagger stuff with an owner who is getting dragegd through the courts left right and center and won't divulge his net worth (probably because it isn't sufficient to run rangers).but the fact that whyte, despite being what seems the legal* shareholder of 83% of our shares, is simply shunned to the side as if he no longer owns them i find pretty bizarre.*i say legal because we could challenge the deal based on the ticketus scam, but until such times as a judge rules on it, surely Whyte is still the legal owner of Rangers FC. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mortos 8 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Whichever group offers the best deal for our creditors. Clark has already made it clear that future financing has nothing to do with them.Yes, that was my understanding.It's a bit worrying though; i think they understand that this isn't just a normal administration, and all eyes are on the process and the outcome. I assume the best outcome for the creditors is the bidder with the biggest wad, but that may not be the best outcome for Rangers. If they do take a broader view, then who do they take advice form as they are not really qualified to make decisions on running a football club - though they couldn't do any worse than us in the last decade or more i suppose.Despite all the troubles we've endured, i still retain ambition...i want us to grow, be successful, do well in Europe, and dominate the scum; i don't want us to become an over-cautious, under ambitious, middle of the road kinda club. We are Rangers after all! I guess that means i want the investor with the big bucks, business acumen, and ambition rather than the bean-counters with limited resources and a rolling 5 year plan. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Yes, that was my understanding.It's a bit worrying though; i think they understand that this isn't just a normal administration, and all eyes are on the process and the outcome. I assume the best outcome for the creditors is the bidder with the biggest wad, but that may not be the best outcome for Rangers. If they do take a broader view, then who do they take advice form as they are not really qualified to make decisions on running a football club - though they couldn't do any worse than us in the last decade or more i suppose.Despite all the troubles we've endured, i still retain ambition...i want us to grow, be successful, do well in Europe, and dominate the scum; i don't want us to become an over-cautious, under ambitious, middle of the road kinda club. We are Rangers after all! I guess that means i want the investor with the big bucks, business acumen, and ambition rather than the bean-counters with limited resources and a rolling 5 year plan.Agreed, mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Londonderry_Bear 111 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 What do the new owners actually get in terms of shareholding? Is it just Whyte's 85% or do they get to take the whole 100% of the club? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.