Gaz92 966 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 Paul Mcbride was always the go to guy for that kinda stuff, hes buried in paperwork right now though, you'll have to try and dig him up from somewhere bad man. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 bad man.Not any more he's not. No more drug & alcohol fuelled orgies in foreign hotel rooms with young boys for him. Cunt should have paid his bill! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delamonty 992 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 And the report says we have debts up to 134 mill quid. hmm When did that happen? Must have missed that eMail. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 bad man. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shootinfishin 93 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 There's mere chance of finding lord lucans boady ! Seriously? The way that brazen cunt sits sipping champers with slappers? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
markybear 136 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 The bigger question here is why no media outlet is questioning the bold conflict of interest here.Whytes lawyer who may by the sound of it been involved in the takeover are now moving to declare him bankrupt, whilst vigorously taking rangers to task over alleged side contracts. It's as if it's all normal, that lawyers can work for both sides of a legal case unquestioned The media need to ask questions, if they don't it's because they don't want to and not because they can't see the conflict of interest Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shootinfishin 93 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 Wait a minute...Harper Macleod were Craig Whyte's lawyers?!? Noone finds this odd given our outrage at their handling of the SPL debacle?They work for Celtic, the SPL and Craig Whyte? The whole fakeover saga gets murkier and murkier.Well maybe he didn't pay his bill, then paid so they withdraw the paperwork Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Educator 1,572 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 The bigger question here is why no media outlet is questioning the bold conflict of interest here.Whytes lawyer who may by the sound of it been involved in the takeover are now moving to declare him bankrupt, whilst vigorously taking rangers to task over alleged side contracts. It's as if it's all normal, that lawyers can work for both sides of a legal case unquestioned The media need to ask questions, if they don't it's because they don't want to and not because they can't see the conflict of interestPerhaps they've represented them as well. The way their name keeps cropping up in this mess it really wouldn't surprise me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 109,756 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 Why's spangles banned? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
will_1974 204 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 The bigger question here is why no media outlet is questioning the bold conflict of interest here.Whytes lawyer who may by the sound of it been involved in the takeover are now moving to declare him bankrupt, whilst vigorously taking rangers to task over alleged side contracts. It's as if it's all normal, that lawyers can work for both sides of a legal case unquestioned The media need to ask questions, if they don't it's because they don't want to and not because they can't see the conflict of interestThe law society of Scotland needs to look into this too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WATP-FOREVER 5,231 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 is harper macleod the only lawyers in Scotland ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 Why's spangles banned? Check my same question/answer in his post about Leggo.......... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peasie 103 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 Whytes lawyer who may by the sound of it been involved in the takeover are now moving to declare him bankrupt, whilst vigorously taking rangers to task over alleged side contracts. Different lawyers involved in the takeover. But it all stinks. The accountants involved in the takeover are also involved in the administration. The lawyer that represents CW on a personal basis are also lawyers for Celtic and also the SPL lawyers involved in the dual contract investigation of Rangers - and ONLY Rangers despite claims other clubs may be involved. One of those lawyers (Rod MacKenzie) gave the game away at an SPL meeting by (allegedly) shouting "you bastards have cheated US for eleven years so deserve to lose your titles". US = he was there as lawyer for the SPL and Rangers were still an SPL club at that time so that doesn't make any sense. Or did he forget he was representing the SPL at that meeting. Did the bigotry that Charles Green talk about get in the way? Or have I added the "us" myself? I'm sure I read it that way at the time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WATP-FOREVER 5,231 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 Different lawyers involved in the takeover. But it all stinks. The accountants involved in the takeover are also involved in the administration. The lawyer that represents CW on a personal basis are also lawyers for Celtic and also the SPL lawyers involved in the dual contract investigation of Rangers - and ONLY Rangers despite claims other clubs may be involved. One of those lawyers (Rod MacKenzie) gave the game away at an SPL meeting by (allegedly) shouting "you bastards have cheated US for eleven years so deserve to lose your titles". US = he was there as lawyer for the SPL and Rangers were still an SPL club at that time so that doesn't make any sense. Or did he forget he was representing the SPL at that meeting. Did the bigotry that Charles Green talk about get in the way? Or have I added the "us" myself? I'm sure I read it that way at the time.That's the way it was. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluedart1952 1,356 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 Not any more he's not. No more drug & alcohol fuelled orgies in foreign hotel rooms with young boys for him. Cunt should have paid his bill!He is paying some of his bills he's in hell being shagged by the DEVIL Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sergio 1,199 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 I see that Harper Mcleod have dropped the claim, I wonder what Whyte said in order for them to do that, seems totally bizarre to me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bouncin' bear 617 28 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 They must be good this Harper MacLeod bunch.When I'm arrested for trashing Hampden I'll definitely be giving them a call.How will we be able to tell the difference? Hamdump is a fuckin' er...emmm...well,dump already,cunt of a stadium. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 He gets let off by not turning up to court never pays any fines. And now. Is he involved with the mafia this little cunt?He seems to get away with everything. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,684 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 Seriously? The way that brazen cunt sits sipping champers with slappers? Naw you've misread it, nae chance of chargin, puttin him intae sequa whateffer, jailin blah blah blah in this pishy wee parish we used tae call hame ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teetobear 27 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 Dose this work in our favour or not what dose this mean for us as a club ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz92 966 Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 How will we be able to tell the difference? Hamdump is a fuckin' er...emmm...well,dump already,cunt of a stadium.Aw trust me mate, I'm a fucking psycho. My sledgehammer and I will leave it looking like Lennon's face. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.