JCDBigBear 10,927 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 I note that the RFC web site states we have reached agreement with Sandaza and that he has now officially gone. This sounds like yet another capitulation from the Club. Charles Green would have taken this all the way. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Sandaza's gone?Gone, gone? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 If they settled with him, then hell mend us...........every agent will have noted this along with the other players that have left recently as the Club being an easy touch in negotiations.This guy Dickson.....what's his background? I found it hard to believe bain was in charge with salary negotiations Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRW. 5,631 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 26,084 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Well done to the club for getting rid of Fran. They seem to be correctly handling things now Chaz is gone. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mgg 3,766 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 I guess this outcome depends on if you think we were right or wrong to boot sandaza Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Would like some clarity on this as to whether he's received any payments since we bumped him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 That is the shortest statement of all time. Sounds like we paid him off very disappointing if true. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Mutual termination...Sounds messy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Surprised we didn't keep him, Ally wants another striker!Fair comment Bud Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbo 588 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Impossible to comment on it without knowing what the 'mutual agreement' contained.No doubt people will spend the next five pages laying into Ally, Mather, Sandaza and whoever else though Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 26,084 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Mutual termination...Sounds messy. Rangers only now sorting the mess CG left behind, To much heavy handedness when Charlie was in control. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 88 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 The grounds for his sacking were pretty shaky and if this had gone to court or a tribunal it could have cost the club a fortune. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza27 15,539 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Fucking horse faced cunt Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,927 Posted July 18, 2013 Author Share Posted July 18, 2013 If they settled with him, then hell mend us...........every agent will have noted this along with the other players that have left recently as the Club being an easy touch in negotiations.This guy Dickson.....what's his background? I found it hard to believe bain was in charge with salary negotiations God knows what is going on now. I'd like to know what has happened financially with Goian, Bocanegra and in particular Sandaza. What kind of money have we agreed to pay the first 2 and we shouldn't have paid Sandaza a penny.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottBF2 3,540 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Sandaza signs for Findus Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,927 Posted July 18, 2013 Author Share Posted July 18, 2013 The grounds for his sacking were pretty shaky and if this had gone to court or a tribunal it could have cost the club a fortune.How were they pretty shaky? Gross misconduct, breach of confidentiality, breaching football rules. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottBF2 3,540 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 God knows what is going on now. I'd like to know what has happened financially with Goian, Bocanegra and in particular Sandaza. What kind of money have we agreed to pay the first 2 and we shouldn't have paid Sandaza a penny..First two asked to have contracts terminated, Fran's been given compensation for his termination.We're back to the days of throwing money at our problems til they go away it seems. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 God knows what is going on now. I'd like to know what has happened financially with Goian, Bocanegra and in particular Sandaza. What kind of money have we agreed to pay the first 2 and we shouldn't have paid Sandaza a penny..Spot on...............people now have to realise that's way players don't really ask for a transfer as they lose any chance of a payoff.That quote............"I am happy to stay with the club" type thing Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottBF2 3,540 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 How were they pretty shaky? Gross misconduct, breach of confidentiality, breaching football rules.It should have went to a tribunal, but Sandaza would have had to pursue that.We wouldn't have won the tribunal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcbear 10,924 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Calm down ffs it was only a bag of hay. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 None of us know what he's been paid, if anything, but that won't stop the next ten pages of RM's resident financial experts coming to their obvious conclusions.See you in the morning when it's been revealed on here that we used what remains of the IPO funds to pay him off... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Well we will never know now, I felt it was harsh at the time but I wish we had stuck by our decision and followed it through I get the feeling CG is being labelled the bad guy now by some at Rangers, we're sorry Fran it was all that big bad Charles Green here's some cash you poor poor man, sort of thing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,590 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Making assumptions again, we know its a mutual agreement, we have no idea what that agreement actually is but that certainly won't stop us doing our Rangers exercises .... jumping to conclusions & leaping into the dark. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottBF2 3,540 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Making assumptions again, we know its a mutual agreement, we have no idea what that agreement actually is but that certainly won't stop us doing our Rangers exercises .... jumping to conclusions & leaping into the dark.There are some people in the world who know exactly what went on. One of the roles of our new head of communications is to protect the clubs image, and that doesn't always mean releasing statements. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.