docspiderman 1,304 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Great, about time the club responded to the rantings and lies being aired in the media by a selection of useless no gooders. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the goal machine 7,989 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 I think the board is coming out of this looking good. showing some strength against liars.They look extremely petty. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 How long til Jack Irvine gets the blame?That's usually a good deflection tactic Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
five stars 1,767 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 They did get one thing right in the statement, that Malcolm Murray was highly respected in the city of londons financial institutions. We can't say the same about Green,Stockridge and Ahmed.The other day our CEO said M.Murray was chairman of the remuneration committee which agreed Green's salary. We now no there was NO such commitee.Look at the facts we know for sure Green walking out the door with 900k and 5 m shares, Ahmed taking us to court supported by Green, Stockridge on 400k.M.Murray a life long Rangers fan who took a modest salary as chaiman.Who do you believe? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 They look extremely petty.not in the slightest. Its not petty putting a liar in his place. especially when some people want that said liar on the board. MM was minico`s final mistake. They aren`t fit to run a piss up in a brewery. well maybe one is. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitre_mouldmaster 21,511 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 well if the board can prove it you will have no option but to cast minico aside and back the board.Yes I know you keep saying you don`t back either side but after this there can only be one side.To be honest, I prefer the board over Murray's mob at the moment, but only because they seem a little less pish.If things dont get better, then I still wont back them, i would want someone else to come in and take over.I dont really buy into the sense of optimism about the accounts, they were pretty rubbish, worse than I predicted actually. I really dont think we are being run right. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 They did get one thing right in the statement, that Malcolm Murray was highly respected in the city of londons financial institutions. We can't say the same about Green,Stockridge and Ahmed.The other day our CEO said M.Murray was chairman of the remuneration committee which agreed Green's salary. We now no there was NO such commitee.Look at the facts we know for sure Green walking out the door with 900k and 5 m shares, Ahmed taking us to court supported by Green, Stockridge on 400k.M.Murray a life long Rangers fan who took a modest salary as chaiman.Who do you believe?Rid beelin ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 The club has spokenThere be the factsLike it or lump it brain washed and agenda pushers Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bothwellbear 1,392 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Nothing like a full on public mud throwing match. Excellent. Just what we need. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 They look extremely petty.While I don't like to see all this fighting done so openly, i wouldn't agree with you here.The board obviously feel that MMs statement was very very misleading and wanted to set the record straight.I doubt the board releases that statement if A) the facts are not correct and B) if MM hadn't released a misleading statement in the first place. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 They look extremely petty.Maybe mate but its necessary and the other faction are way higher up the petty-o-meter than the board are at the moment. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the goal machine 7,989 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 not in the slightest. Its not petty putting a liar in his place. especially when some people want that said liar on the board. MM was minico`s final mistake. They aren`t fit to run a piss up in a brewery. well maybe one is.How do you know he's a liar? Because the board said so? Seems like solid reasoning. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 To be honest, I prefer the board over Murray's mob at the moment, but only because they seem a little less pish.If things dont get better, then I still wont back them, i would want someone else to come in and take over.I dont really buy into the sense of optimism about the accounts, they were pretty rubbish, worse than I predicted actually. I really dont think we are being run right.sorry but you don`t have an option C. until that happens its either A or B. accounts aren`t rubbish because they are worse than you predicted . In the grand scale of things you are nothing.sorry.The real guys who count like Prior don`t think they are rubbish and thats what counts as he`s a major shareholder. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 They did get one thing right in the statement, that Malcolm Murray was highly respected in the city of londons financial institutions. We can't say the same about Green,Stockridge and Ahmed.The other day our CEO said M.Murray was chairman of the remuneration committee which agreed Green's salary. We now no there was NO such commitee.Look at the facts we know for sure Green walking out the door with 900k and 5 m shares, Ahmed taking us to court supported by Green, Stockridge on 400k.M.Murray a life long Rangers fan who took a modest salary as chaiman.Who do you believe?the board.If they were to release this statement without full knowledge of the facts, they would effectively be turning another massive portion of the support against themI highly highly doubt this has been released without being factually accurate.If I am wrong, then I'll admit it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 How do you know he's a liar? Because the board said so? Seems like solid reasoning.obviously you have a problem reading. "well if the board can prove it " Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the goal machine 7,989 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 While I don't like to see all this fighting done so openly, i wouldn't agree with you here.The board obviously feel that MMs statement was very very misleading and wanted to set the record straight.I doubt the board releases that statement if A) the facts are not correct and B) if MM hadn't released a misleading statement in the first place.Could say the same about Murray. He felt the board put out a misleading statement and then responded. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Just filled my proxy forms inAnd it's bad news for Mini Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the goal machine 7,989 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 obviously you have a problem reading. "well if the board can prove it "That wasn't in the last post that I quoted. However you did call him a liar. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Could say the same about Murray. He felt the board put out a misleading statement and then responded.Yup, but I feel the board have way way more to lose by lying in this situation.Which is why i tend to believe them.MM has nothing to lose and everything to gain, the board are the complete opposite. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Nothing like a full on public mud throwing match. Excellent. Just what we need.The club is only responding to MMs claims If you want to grumble at this latest bout of mudslinging see MM and then the club wouldn't feel the need to come out and clarify these continued lies and pish smears It's got to the stage where one camp actually hate the club now That's how it seems Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the goal machine 7,989 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Yup, but I feel the board have way way more to lose by lying in this situation.Which is why i tend to believe them.MM has nothing to lose and everything to gain, the board are the complete opposite.Seems like a rather flimsy reason to get behind one of the groups. Neither parties deserve the support IMO. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Seems like a rather flimsy reason to get behind one of the groups. Neither parties deserve the support IMO.I have my reasons for being behind this group.I am only talking about why I believe the board in this particular instance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
five stars 1,767 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 We are a joke at the minute. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaujolais 1,371 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 Whilst it is unpleasant reading an Official Statement from the Club that identifies the failings of a former Director- I can see why it has come to this. The Directors have a duty to Rangers Football Club and it's shareholders to protect its brand value. The actions of some former Directors have clearly compromised that brand value. They must now either put up or shut up. For Malcom Murray the choice is stark. He can now take them to Court for Defamation of Character- the Club statement does publicly question his professionalism and integrity- if untrue it is Libellous. If he chooses not to, or does go to court and is unable to demonstrate Defamation- then it must be assumed he is in the wrong.It is actually very sad, no one wishes to see this sort of behaviour. However the degree of provocation from some of those parties publicly briefing the media as part of the Requisition has been at an unacceptable level for some time now.The Club needs to move on. If this is the only way of clearings it decks- then so be it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 77,531 Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 The mudslinging from both sides is embarrasing our great club!Petty fucking nonsense. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.