siddiqi_drinker 14,635 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 what if the meeting that would turn ongoing discussions into a firm offer was cancelled? in other words discussions where ongoing until the club cancelled those discussions.although not a lie not as black and white as BB would like you all to believe. the club needs to stop answering like poloticians and state their plans.What if your auntie had balls, oh aye that's right........ So there might have been discussions which the club might have cancelled after a meeting you are sure 'might' have taken place?Might is right.No idea what 'poloticians' are - some new species of Atlantic fish?You really are an amusing little chap. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 It is incredible how badly the Q & A is being received on ££, a couple who frequent here also are more bitter and forthright with their attacks on GW than they are here, maybe it's the herd mentality over on spackers ££. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 It seems that the above quote is a bit hard for some to grasp.There is a hard core of people on here who hate the board more than they live the clubThe board can do no right in their eyesI'm convinced several of them are timsThere is no other explanation for their behaviour Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 if you cant listen when we say stop giving the Daily Record exclusives you aint going to listen to fuck all else.lets make this clear...STOP USING THE DAILY RECORD TO COMMUNICATE WITH RANGERS FANS.WE REFUSE TO READ THAT BIGOTED SHIT.You seemed happy enough when mini and malky were giving keetch exclusives. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 768 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 So how would king hand the money over is it a case of say here is a donation or would it be for shares?no idea the make up of the deal, but cash in the accounts can be used for anything the board like.As they said before once money is in the pot it is impossible to tell if it was money raised from x place.It is incredible how badly the Q & A is being received on ££, a couple who frequent here also are more bitter and forthright with their attacks on GW than they are here, maybe it's the herd mentality over on spackers ££.so you are a member of FF and im not but you constantly try to label me as one of them? bit rich. why do you go on their site to find out their opinion when you clearly dont value their opinion?surely you are not going out your way to learn their opinion so you can post it on here and put one set of fans against the other? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flany-kpl 7 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 There is a hard core of people on here who hate the board more than they live the clubThe board can do no right in their eyesI'm convinced several of them are timsThere is no other explanation for their behaviourThere is that.And there's also an element of our fans that were so against the requisitioners and their supporters - includng the RST, SOS, Fury - That they will blindly back anything the suits at our club are doing without scrutiny. I agree some people are being hysterical but others who are concerned are no less fans than you.I've been quietly impressed with Wallace up until now, even though I know very little about what he's been doing behind the scenes, but I've been wrong before (on a few occasions) because dropping our drawers for anyone who makes the right noises is what we've been doing for the last few years with no success.You can't say that everyone who question the board hate them more than they love Rangers, that would be stupid. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 You seemed happy enough when mini and malky were giving keetch exclusives.I know the irony is quite funny but you are the 3rd person to mention that here and he is yet to defend his stance on that! Tells you slit about the poster! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Very good interview by Wallace despite the snidey cunt asking loaded questions. Wraps up the Dave King question and shows for all Mr Kings words he doesn't want to buy us at this time anyway, a new share issue one day but that's all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 There is that.And there's also an element of our fans that were so against the requisitioners and their supporters - includng the RST, SOS, Fury - That they will blindly back anything the suits at our club are doing without scrutiny. I agree some people are being hysterical but others who are concerned are no less fans than you.I've been quietly impressed with Wallace up until now, even though I know very little about what he's been doing behind the scenes, but I've been wrong before (on a few occasions) because dropping our drawers for anyone who makes the right noises is what we've been doing for the last few years with no success.You can't say that everyone who question the board hate them more than they love Rangers, that would be stupid.But some of them are definitely tims Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 768 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 It seems that the above quote is a bit hard for some to grasp.really hard for you lot to grasp it is impossible to make an offer if they refuse to meet with you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 I know the irony is quite funny but you are the 3rd person to mention that here and he is yet to defend his stance on that! Tells you slit about the poster!Tells me he's a hypocrite, i hate anybody connected with Rangers going to the rheble but as BlueDignity says it seems like its happening whether we like it or not. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bothwellbear 1,392 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Nobody seemed to complain when the record was spouting out anti board rhetoric and bigging up Murray et al!Yes they did. They did continually. Those who were the uber pro board on here used it as a stick to beat the other side. Pretty sure it was a vice versa situation as well when Wallace spoke to the record pre AGM. People like to use the Daily Rebel to suit there agendas. Thing is though. , there are still many of thousands of Bears who buy it and believe it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flany-kpl 7 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 But some of them are definitely timsInternets full of them, just type in Imran Ahmed on twitter and see who's doing most of the talking. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
willygers4life 1,031 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 really hard for you lot to grasp it is impossible to make an offer if they refuse to meet with you.How hard is it for you to grasp that king claimed we be in admin at December, that he would buy shares when they dropped below 30p, it's simple the only way king will spunk money into the club is via share issue or admin. That's it nothing else, if he was keen then he would target small shareholders like ally and MM buy there shares to get a foothold, even declare he wishes to be anonymous till he hits the 3% or above quota Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,532 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 did keith get those questions straight from the reqs? What does that mean? Those are the questions that had to be asked, that Wallace would have wanted asked and would have been ready for. If they were not asked the interview is pointless. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Interesting that Wallace has chosen English last month and now Jackson for his Q&A's. i wonder if this is a bridge building excercise to get some of them a bit more on board. "I'll give you an exclusive if you stop being quite so vitrioic about the club" type of thing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,532 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Very good interview by Wallace despite the snidey cunt asking loaded questions. Wraps up the Dave King question and shows for all Mr Kings words he doesn't want to buy us at this time anyway, a new share issue one day but that's all. I don't see this tbh. Realistically all of those questions had to be asked and Wallace would have been ready for them. I don't think KJ was trying to catch anyone out, he was giving Wallace the chance to respond to questions that are out there already and being discussed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 I am actually glad that it was KJ that done the interview, and I think Wallace has chose him on purpose.He ws one of the guys revealing all the exclusives and helping to stir the pot. So he has given him info str8 from the horses mouth, "spin that one" is his message IMO. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 768 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Speaking to Express Sport, Wallace said: “Dave King has made no other financial offer to the club, other than to say he’d be a willing participant in a future equity issue.” But the chief executive rejected suggestions he had already turned down bids from the tycoon. “The idea that the club or board have rebuffed some wonderful offer from Dave King is strictly not the case,” he said. “He has responded, advising the club he’d be a willing investor if there would be a further equity issue. We have said we know the club will require investment at some point but we haven’t put a time frame around that. end of GW Statement...nobody ever thought he just offered cash to cover the short fall in some wonderful gesture.What I wanted to know was could you have diluted the share for cash from King instead of taking out debt. A offer he came over last week to have signed.As GW admits, yes he could have but they have planned not to at this point even though they could see the short fall well in advance.so DK did advise he would put up investment if they put up a further equity issue. Would you not call advising the club he would put in money through an equity scheme an offer?GW was saying there was no other offer but i never thought there was two offers just one. Cash for equity. The club decided to take debt instead of doing a equity deal.Well played Mr Wallace you confused many on here with that answer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 I am actually glad that it was KJ that done the interview, and I think Wallace has chose him on purpose.He ws one of the guys revealing all the exclusives and helping to stir the pot. So he has given him info str8 from the horses mouth, "spin that one" is his message IMO.And the rheble gets the best of both worlds, taigs buying the editions that scaremonger on admin2 and bears buying the editions where Wallace dismisses said scaremongering. Where would the rheble be without us? Bankrupt most likely. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
willygers4life 1,031 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Speaking to Express Sport, Wallace said: “Dave King has made no other financial offer to the club, other than to say he’d be a willing participant in a future equity issue.” But the chief executive rejected suggestions he had already turned down bids from the tycoon. “The idea that the club or board have rebuffed some wonderful offer from Dave King is strictly not the case,” he said. “He has responded, advising the club he’d be a willing investor if there would be a further equity issue. We have said we know the club will require investment at some point but we haven’t put a time frame around that. end of GW Statement...nobody ever thought he just offered cash to cover the short fall in some wonderful gesture.What I wanted to know was could you have diluted the share for cash from King instead of taking out debt. A offer he came over last week to have signed.As GW admits, yes he could have but they have planned not to at this point even though they could see the short fall well in advance.so DK did advise he would put up investment if they put up a further equity issue. Would you not call advising the club he would put in money through an equity scheme an offer?GW was saying there was no other offer but i never thought there was two offers just one. Cash for equity. The club decided to take debt instead of doing a equity deal.Well played Mr Wallace you confused many on here with that answer.So you are saying that DK offered cash for shares yes Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBluebells 6,898 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 A good read that which you'd think would calm people down.With regards to King I'd rather see us in a state of self sufficiency so that money that may be put in in the future is a bonus rather than relied on to keep us going. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 768 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 So you are saying that DK offered cash for shares yesdon't need to me to tell you. read GW words. He freely admits DK advised he would invest in a further equity issue. The lawman can explain the term equity issue better than me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 So you are saying that DK offered cash for shares yesTypical spacker affliction doesn't know its arse from elbow and classes everyone as confused as him..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 768 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Typical spacker affliction doesn't know its arse from elbow and classes everyone as confused as him..... they had other options than loans, they refused them. All there in GW words.Are you saying GW is lying. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.