Police Investigating a Twatter Troll

[B1872 20,721]

The reason I don't have Twitter is in case I get steaming and give a Tim abuse because I know I'd end up losing my job or facing a jail term. So this wee guy deserves everything he gets. To be honest I think we should be reporting these kind of things more often because we are always portrayed as the bad guys when the truth is the total opposite!

[TheBluebells 6,898]

Yet some on here were defending him!!!!

You're fucking at it.

[TheBluebells 6,898]

Also, this dick deserves all he gets, how in this day and age people can say things like that on social media and think it will go unnoticed is beyond me.

[B1872 20,721]

You're fucking at it.

Read the original thread FS!

[TheBluebells 6,898]

Read the original thread FS!

You're the only one who seems to have made up that people on here were defending someone mocking the Ibrox disaster.

You've royally fucked up here...

[B1872 20,721]

You're the only one who seems to have made up that people on here were defending someone mocking the Ibrox disaster.

You've royally fucked up here...

How the fuck have I?

You're boring me now!

Good bye

[TheBluebells 6,898]

How the fuck have I?

You're boring me now!

Good bye

Now now simmer down, roll out the evidence of bears on here defending someone mocking the Ibrox disaster....

[B1872 20,721]

Now now simmer down, roll out the evidence of bears on here defending someone mocking the Ibrox disaster....

As I've previously said the issue is on the original thread I felt myself arguing with other bears about the punishment the wee dick deserved. I felt he should have lost his job and got jailed where as other people were of the opinion it was football banter and he shouldve kept his job etc

[legalbeagle 3,734]

As I've previously said the issue is on the original thread I felt myself arguing with other bears about the punishment the wee dick deserved. I felt he should have lost his job and got jailed where as other people were of the opinion it was football banter and he shouldve kept his job etc

So not defending him then?

[Smile 26,610]

Now now simmer down, roll out the evidence of bears on here defending someone mocking the Ibrox disaster....

There was a thread before chopped by Admin.

[TheBluebells 6,898]

As I've previously said the issue is on the original thread I felt myself arguing with other bears about the punishment the wee dick deserved. I felt he should have lost his job and got jailed where as other people were of the opinion it was football banter and he shouldve kept his job etc

So that'll be no one defending him then?

[TheBluebells 6,898]

There was a thread before chopped by Admin.

Im aware, i seen it.

I don't recall anyone defending his actions and it appears several posters and an admin do not either.

[Smile 26,610]

Im aware, i seen it.

I don't recall anyone defending his actions and it appears several posters and an admin do not either.

I think some were saying he should not be reported at his work, Which i think he still should. I think that was the defending bridos talking about.

[B1872 20,721]

There was a quote saying along the lines of 'football banter' which I was actually referring to. just the fact I was arguing with another Bears in here left a bad taste. Maybe that's where the 'defending' comment came from.

Last thing I wanted was to argue with half the folk on here with my comment!

[JCDBigBear 10,825]

Can we not stop arguing with each other on this issue. The guy is now (rightly) in bother because of his disgraceful post. I think we are all in agreement about that.

[govanblue 16,847]

...other people were of the opinion ot was football banter and he shouldve kept his job etc

You're referring to me here, and you're completely wrong.

As the poster who voiced the opinion, I am best placed to know what the opinion was.

The opinion was that the poster should be referred to focus, and that we Rangers fans should not be encouraging each other to phone up employers demanding people be sacked. Things should be done properly.

Not least of all because 'Mr Bell' now has an easy opportunity to claim that any future trial will be prejudiced due to the actions of such callers.

At no time did I say that it was just football banter, nor did I suggest that he should keep his job - I said that we should not start a witch hunt, because witch-hunts are ugly and not the kind of thing I want any part of.

Bear in mind that someone misidentified the twitter account on that thread too - we came close to potentially ruining an innocent man's life.

[JCDBigBear 10,825]

Bear in mind that someone misidentified the twitter account on that thread too - we came close to potentially ruining an innocent man's life.

That is correct.

[Bobby Hume 13,098]

There was a quote saying along the lines of 'football banter' which I was actually referring to. just the fact I was arguing with another Bears in here left a bad taste. Maybe that's where the 'defending' comment came from.

Last thing I wanted was to argue with half the folk on here with my comment!

I understand the point you make about the difference between football banter and outright disrespect, some people are unaware of the difference, as is the case of this troll halfwit.

I personally don't think a person should be jailed for singing a song (TBB for example) at a football match. This I would consider winding up the opposition and as football banter where the opposition has the opportunity to retaliate justifiably.

On the other hand any derogatory remarks against the victims of the 71 disaster at Ibrox or any other stadia are taboo and completely out of order, as they do not have the right of reply, this is an absolute disgrace, and the laws of decency should be applied, plus the law of the land brought to bear on the person or persons perpetrating this abuse of the tragic event, not to mention the living relatives of the dead who have to live with the loss of loved ones every day of their lives, until they too pass on.

This reprobate has breached the bounds of decency in this case, and cannot be "defended" and should be punished accordingly.

[Dutchy 1,200]

Albear: Funny thing that! My girl does her Kaboom stint every year in Holland were different teams all compete at the amateur dramatics. Her theme this year is CSI. Last time I was over there we spent all our time looking for torches with blue light and eventually found them. She bought the orange glasses online. I better not do anything wrong, or I'm done for.

[Rupret 223]

My own tuppence, down south you have Munich and Heysel for idiot trolling fans posting shit.

This Tweet was not funny at all, he deserves to lose his job (fool's Twitter account linked), jail no chance.

A drunk neddish troll move on, nothing to see here.

[Rapid6 77]

I tried to send an email to Michelin in Dundee after it was reported here that was his work. Couldn't get past the anti spam thing tho. Is that where he works / worked?

[NamibianBear 1,851]

I understand the point you make about the difference between football banter and outright disrespect, some people are unaware of the difference, as is the case of this troll halfwit.

I personally don't think a person should be jailed for singing a song (TBB for example) at a football match. This I would consider winding up the opposition and as football banter where the opposition has the opportunity to retaliate justifiably.

On the other hand any derogatory remarks against the victims of the 71 disaster at Ibrox or any other stadia are taboo and completely out of order, as they do not have the right of reply, this is an absolute disgrace, and the laws of decency should be applied, plus the law of the land brought to bear on the person or persons perpetrating this abuse of the tragic event, not to mention the living relatives of the dead who have to live with the loss of loved ones every day of their lives, until they too pass on.

This reprobate has breached the bounds of decency in this case, and cannot be "defended" and should be punished accordingly.

Football banter is all good and fun when it is banter. When it is sung in a way designed to cause maximum aggravation then it does need to be stopped. The laws of the land are clear with regards inciting violence. How you determine that fine line I do not know.

I personally think the offended brigade do take stuff too far. They can call each other fenians, we are not allowed to use that nasty word in case we offend someone. Black guys can call each other niggers or kaffirs, a white guy would get the jail for a comment like that. Do we really get offended by being called h*** or do we laugh it off?

The correct thing to do in this case would be to pass the matter to the appropriate authorities and let them deal with it. Some offended Rangers fans phoning his work is uncalled for. The guy is a cretin. A stupid drunken remark that should never have been made will cost this guy his job and respect of people about him if there is any justice left in this world.

[Guest]

I hope this fucks all of his career prospects. And that he ends up in the gutter on smack. Utter fucking rodent, subhuman scum.

[siddiqi_drinker 14,635]

I feel he will receive the ultimate retribution. The UoF and SoS will spray paint his residence

Hope he gets jail time and has to share a cell with a priest pedophile.

[Brian Fantana 28,894]

. Some offended Rangers fans phoning his work is uncalled for. The guy is a cretin. A stupid drunken remark that should never have been made will cost this guy his job and respect of people about him if there is any justice left in this world.

why? if a comedian makes sick comments on the forum of television they get complaints to their broadcaster, watchdogs, police etc. - Twitter is also a forum so the complaints have gone that way too.