BlueMe 25,327 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Inigo said: Yeah, it does. It's got massive Rangers content. And that's hinted at in the name somewhere. Ergo BD relevant, seeing as the BD is for Rangers related discussion and content. So as long as a thread has some Rangers related content, it's all good? Might start a thread on Scott Brown and the time he nearly signed for Rangers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, BlueMe said: The BJK thread wasn't exclusively discussing celtic paedophiles either, but you wanted that moved. Actually no, I just wanted other clubs discussed but that wasn't acceptable for some since it wasn't on the same scale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, DBBTB said: Who the fuck is Timps? that was his name, on here..... anyway he wouldn't be posting about chummy chats with the filth Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, thehost said: that was his name, on here..... anyway he wouldn't be posting about chummy chats with the filth Wasn't his thing chummy chats with Brian Stockbridge instead? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,534 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, thehost said: so we can post up phil 4 name and john james in here then? as those two cunts do nothing but write about us I'd say you can post anything Rangers related. There's a different reason I wouldn't want them posted, not because of the topic they're talking about. If it were some Arsenal podcaster with 10 minutes of content about us that folk might find interesting then yeah. If it was Rangers content that was by Rangers people and happened also to include sellic, or Hearts or Hibs or whoever contributors, as long as it's got significant Rangers focus then it's all good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, The Dude said: Wasn't his thing chummy chats with Brian Stockbridge instead? I believe he was speaking to them about weaknesses in their IT infrastructure or climbing ropes in a gym according to #hiredhands Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, thehost said: I believe he was speaking to them about weaknesses in their IT infrastructure or climbing ropes in a gym according to #hiredhands He was a bit of a champion of old Stockers was Mr G. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 7 minutes ago, thehost said: he was banned because of a duality of name No, he had a meltdown and demanded to be banned because I wasn't, I'm sure. Had a full-on tantrum calling folk all sorts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malkytfp1 18,618 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 44 minutes ago, BlueMe said: The bears den is clearly the place to be discussing Lee Griffiths? Can imagine the up roar of you at Ibrox when we sing the "Fuck Lee griffiths" song telling people Ibrox isnt the place to sing that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,534 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, BlueMe said: So as long as a thread has some Rangers related content, it's all good? Might start a thread on Scott Brown and the time he nearly signed for Rangers. Significant or predominant Rangers content, yeah. Scott Brown is predominantly sellic related now, to say the least, and in hindsight has never been of any great significant to us in a direct sense. Doesn't bear any reasonable comparison to a 50% Rangers show. Each thing should be judged on it's own merits. A 50% Rangers podcast is most definitely Rangers related content for the BD. A current selluc captain once being linked with is clearly a bit more tenuous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malkytfp1 18,618 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 I listened to the 1st one and will give this one a go. If it's not for you then simply don't listen/comment. Coming on here greetin cause you don't like the content is silly. Believe it or not a podcast talking about Rangers and our biggest rivals is relevant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 12 minutes ago, BlueMe said: So as long as a thread has some Rangers related content, it's all good? Might start a thread on Scott Brown and the time he nearly signed for Rangers. Are artices by the Vanguard Bears discussing celtic relevant to the BD? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMe 25,327 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, Malkytfp1 said: Can imagine the up roar of you at Ibrox when we sing the "Fuck Lee griffiths" song telling people Ibrox isnt the place to sing that. That's not even remotely similar ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ger4life_1872 29,623 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 43 minutes ago, BlueMe said: I've got no issue with @The Dude at all and actually agree with a lot of his posts, and good luck with the pod cast tbh. My only problem is this being in the bears den. Should be in the general football section because it's a general football discussion, fuck knows how that fact is even being disputed tbh. Scottish football thread in general sports is perfect for it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, ger4life_1872 said: Scottish football thread in general sports is perfect for it Why would a discussion about the Rangers manager be in the Scottish football thread in general sports? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,958 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 So for the last 4 pages I have read nothing that tells me anything about Rangers. ( I will not listen to the podcast ). It doesn't belong in BD. Everyone of his threads or discussions end up in controversy and that is what he wants. Modern day Scottish journalists are trollers. You just have to look at Spiers, Jackson & English to see that. I guess I will just have to wait until the Gaffer speaks to get my Rangers related news. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMe 25,327 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 5 minutes ago, The Dude said: Are artices by the Vanguard Bears discussing celtic relevant to the BD? No idea, don't read them. I'm assuming they're aimed at celtic negatively and not having friendly chats with David and Hamish from 67 Hail Hail and at least have a positive reason to be there though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, BlueMe said: No idea, don't read them. I'm assuming they're aimed at celtic negatively and not having friendly chats with David and Hamish from 67 Hail Hail, at least have a positive reason to be there though. So tell me what I said about celtic? Does laughing at their appointment of a summer intern as director of football count as negative? how about appointing the manager when he's in the shower? SAying their new super duper 7m signing is to pull the woll over their fans eyes? That's all just nice, positive, friendly chat I suppose. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ger4life_1872 29,623 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: Why would a discussion about the Rangers manager be in the Scottish football thread in general sports? It's not just about Gerrard though or that would belong in a Gerrard thread , it's a general Scottish football podcast so I would suggest the Scottish football thread would be the perfect place for it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Negri's lovechild 14,179 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, bluenoz said: So for the last 4 pages I have read nothing that tells me anything about Rangers. ( I will not listen to the podcast ). It doesn't belong in BD. Everyone of his threads or discussions end up in controversy and that is what he wants. Modern day Scottish journalists are trollers. You just have to look at Spiers, Jackson & English to see that. I guess I will just have to wait until the Gaffer speaks to get my Rangers related news. I agree with your points on modern Scottish journalists in general but you can't surely make a decision about wether or not it should be in BD if you haven't listened to it? If you listened and didn t like it, then fair enough. I listened and quite liked it. Decent background debate for tidying up or whatever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, bluenoz said: So for the last 4 pages I have read nothing that tells me anything about Rangers. ( I will not listen to the podcast ). It doesn't belong in BD. Everyone of his threads or discussions end up in controversy and that is what he wants. Modern day Scottish journalists are trollers. You just have to look at Spiers, Jackson & English to see that. I guess I will just have to wait until the Gaffer speaks to get my Rangers related news. Then why bother going into a thread specifically about a podcast you wont listen to? No idea what relevance Gerrard speaking has to do with anything? We're not a 'news' show. It's five guys chatting about what has happened in the previous week. Not sure why anyone would listen to our podcast to replace getting news from elsewhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, ger4life_1872 said: It's not just about Gerrard though or that would belong in a Gerrard thread , it's a general Scottish football podcast so I would suggest the Scottish football thread would be the perfect place for it No, it's about McGregor too. And the Mansfield game and a few other bits. Would we discuss the Old Firm game in the general scottish football thread? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,669 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 27 minutes ago, The Dude said: Youve posted about 10 times telling us it shouldn't be in the BD. That's not what I'm saying. Not close to it. I don't see any discussion exclusively surrounding celtic players in the BD. Could you perhaps point me to it? There is a podcast that does discuss their players as well as discussing Gerrard's future, McGregor, the Mansfield game and probably other stuff too (can't actually remember). Bad things, I hope. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMe 25,327 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 1 minute ago, The Dude said: So tell me what I said about celtic? Does laughing at their appointment of a summer intern as director of football count as negative? how about appointing the manager when he's in the shower? SAying their new super duper 7m signing is to pull the woll over their fans eyes? That's all just nice, positive, friendly chat I suppose. No idea and honestly don't care. That's my point. celtic shouldn't be a discussion for the bears den. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, ForeverAndEver said: Bad things, I hope. Bit of both. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.