JR 1,480 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Red card stands, lets just get on with beating them and going for the quadruple treble. (Source Official text) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,684 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Never expected anything else really ! Let's just get on with it and beat them ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR 1,480 Posted February 5, 2008 Author Share Posted February 5, 2008 Never expected anything else really ! Let's just get on with it and beat them ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Artist 143 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 thought that would happen. the fact there was no contact means nothing to the SFA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
diesel0412 1 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Never expected anything else really ! Let's just get on with it and beat them ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueIsTheColour 35 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 I take it McGregor will only serve a one match ban? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrandSuckMaster 1,775 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 I hate to say the SFA are correct but on this occassion they are Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnionJack 1 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 when we finally get past Hibs its a home tie against Livi or Partick so might as well play with no goalie , should still have game won by halftime. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Exactly what I expected. In Alexander we have a good replacement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibleedblue 0 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 There are only grounds for an appeal if the ref isn't satisfied with his decision. They way we've been treated by officials this season, then there was never any chance of him not being satisfied with a wrong decision against us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfc_no1fan 13 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Your kidden! Clear that the referees and SPL are against us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaltersGotStyle 160 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 There was no contact, no contact = no foul therefore SFA = STUPID F*CKING A*SES Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Thinking about this, and even though the decision will now stand and McGregor will miss the replay who thinks that Alexander should be given a few matches between now and then to get him used to the team and the defence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirkiebear 1,013 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 I thought the ref said he took the ball, how the fuck was it a sending off then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfc_no1fan 13 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 I thought the ref said he took the ball, how the fuck was it a sending off then? Sometimes in football a free kick can be given even if the Player making the tackle takes a bit of the ball. In my opinion the Referee got the decision correct and it was a goal scoring opportunity, so it is a red card. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 I didn't think there was any contact, hence no foul. Another joke decision from the SFA. I would have been screaming blue murder if Ma Kalamby had done it to Darche when he was running through though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
docspiderman 1,248 Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 With the speed both players were moving any contact would have meant that the Hibs actor would not have "recovered " like he did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 With the speed both players were moving any contact would have meant that the Hibs actor would not have "recovered " like he did. I don't get why he didn't stay on his feet! It was an open goal. I'm no pro, but I play enough football to understand that it wasn't a hard enough tackle to trip the lad. Especially given that no contact was made. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts