Ibroxblue 122 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 http://www.rangers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Ne...1493971,00.html If the Boogie Man can't play I think we should give the same back 4 another chance, even though it's a risk. I'm not in favour of continual chopping and changing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gid 46 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 I agree... besides who else we gonna bring in??? McCulloch??? I thought big Kirk had no a bad game anyways. Wasn't at fault for the goals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chambo 197 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 I agree... besides who else we gonna bring in??? McCulloch??? I thought big Kirk had no a bad game anyways. Wasn't at fault for the goals. He was playing on the left though? No? And!........Did Feeney not beat him to the header for the second? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gizmico1986 0 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 i'm convinced he isn't playing cos he's already agreed to go to marseille. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dazzapat 83 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 i'm convinced he isn't playing cos he's already agreed to go to marseille. Wouldnt be a surprise but will give him the benefit of doubt at the moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffbear 4,096 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Broadfoot had a mare against UTD as did Whittaker but we have no-one else at the moment.. Luckily Hibs aren't as good as UTD. This Bougherra injury kind of sprung from nowhere didn't it or am i being paranoid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Stars Bearette 1 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 he's injured a lot these days dammit we are real weak at the back right now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Bougherra's picked up some sort of Carlos Cuellar type injury - the weird ones you seem to get at Murray Park just before you're sold Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WATP52 0 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 burkes got the cold and doesn't want to play :barf: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Maestro 11,103 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Has Bougherra not had quite a few injuries since he's joined now? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gizmico1986 0 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 i'm convinced he isn't playing cos he's already agreed to go to marseille. Wouldnt be a surprise but will give him the benefit of doubt at the moment. smells of the boumsong/cuellar/hutton deals. team declares interest. player says the want to stay. player gets mysterious injury. player sold. Murray rubs his hands together. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Stars Bearette 1 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 i'm convinced he isn't playing cos he's already agreed to go to marseille. Wouldnt be a surprise but will give him the benefit of doubt at the moment. smells of the boumsong/cuellar/hutton deals. team declares interest. player says the want to stay. player gets mysterious injury. player sold. Murray rubs his hands together. true actually how many times have we seen this scenario before hopefully not though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibroxblue 122 Posted December 19, 2008 Author Share Posted December 19, 2008 Cuellar was injured for a while after he joined Villa as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
edranger 0 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Looks like he is on the way Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
docspiderman 1,228 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 This gives a massive problem for tomorrow. Broadfoot at central defence but it means that Whittaker has to play against his old team, a match where he always goes to pieces. Not good enough for anyway but a bigger risk against Hibs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManchestGer 347 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Dissapointing to hear. I'd still go with the same back four I'm not a fan of chopping and changing either Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,705 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Broadfoot had a mare against UTD as did Whittaker but we have no-one else at the moment.. Luckily Hibs aren't as good as UTD. This Bougherra injury kind of sprung from nowhere didn't it or am i being paranoid. broadfoot did nothing wrong against UTD, he performed as well as he did the last time he played CB for us, the crosses bypassed him to the back post and there was nothing he could do, the blame goes elsewhere, and if bougherra cant make it, I know id rather have broadfoot in the middle rather than lee mcculloch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gid 46 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 I agree... besides who else we gonna bring in??? McCulloch??? I thought big Kirk had no a bad game anyways. Wasn't at fault for the goals. He was playing on the left though? No? And!........Did Feeney not beat him to the header for the second? No and no Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chambo 197 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 I agree... besides who else we gonna bring in??? McCulloch??? I thought big Kirk had no a bad game anyways. Wasn't at fault for the goals. He was playing on the left though? No? And!........Did Feeney not beat him to the header for the second? No and no I beg to differ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gid 46 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 I agree... besides who else we gonna bring in??? McCulloch??? I thought big Kirk had no a bad game anyways. Wasn't at fault for the goals. He was playing on the left though? No? And!........Did Feeney not beat him to the header for the second? No and no I beg to differ! I deny your right to differ ... since you're begging. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
norgerpd 280 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 Broadfoot Weir Papac Smith. Sounds straight forward to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,705 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 first goal went past papac to the unmarked lee wilkie second goal, ball went past weir to feeneny with mcculloch behind him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
norgerpd 280 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 The problem lay with Whitaker allowing the crosses to come over at th rate they did :unionflag: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,705 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 The problem lay with Whitaker allowing the crosses to come over at th rate they did :unionflag: the first one maybe, the second one he closed down conway and forced him to pass it back, his lack of support at that point allowed dixon to get another cross in Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
norgerpd 280 Posted December 19, 2008 Share Posted December 19, 2008 I dont dislike Whitaker but I dont think hes a full back.Still thnk h stood off Conway thus allowing him the time to play the ball back.He was lost against Conway(WHO?) all day long. :unionflag: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts