gsa
-
Posts
6,188 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by gsa
-
-
3 minutes ago, fanaticCR said:
Actually I’ve decided next time he comes to ibrox I’m running on and leathering the fucking dobber.
Can we hold you to that?
-
-
I've been highly critical of him in the past but fair play to him, he's giving all he can and he's cut out all the rolling around.
Not a great player and has physical deficiencies but he's not actually any worse than Jack, Arfield, etc.
Sad in itself when you actually think about it.
-
2 minutes ago, Bristol loyal said:
He has a job to do and does it very well imo. It’s one of those jobs in football that rarely gets noticed, he doesn’t do anything flashy but the work he does is vital, his intelligence and reading of the game are brilliant.
I feel sorry for him because he’s doing his job while the other two in our midfield generally are not, making the whole midfield look bad.
Nonsense. He's not doing his job at all, he's an appalling example of the "Makele role". Let's people run off his shoulder, no intelligence or nous, gives the ball away, physically weak, makes stupid fouls to try and prove he's a hardman. He's average SPL fodder.
a
-
4 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:
It's all fair points to be fair
Sadiq in defence is not a fair point but agree with the rest.
-
2 hours ago, Smile said:
We need two physically imposing players in the middle our teams filled with wee boys and even the big lads are weak in the tackle.
Rossiter is more aggressive than any of our other midfielders can especially Jack who's a little boy but tries to convince the fans he's a tough guy with stupid fouls.
-
4 hours ago, ForeverAndEver said:
He was our best player in his only game this season, despite his fuck up at the goal
And the best player in his only league match (I think?) last season against Hibs.
- ForeverAndEver and terry739
-
2
-
9 hours ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:
So you're now actively and deliberately caveating statements on a fitba forum are you? ?
Ok. Dugshite again from you.
Try just typing what you mean, preferably something less ridiculous than you have done today.
OK performance, given the circumstances = 'doesn't remotely suggest I'd be happy for him to play again'
? Belter
It doesn't though. That's very obvious. No idea why you're making such a fuss, possibly embarrassment.
"Belter" you really are a moron aren't you?
-
4 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:
Yeah. If you mean something different from what you typed then it is.
???
Absolute retard.
Any normal person knows when a statement is caveated.
-
1 hour ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:
What the fuck does it mean then? Ok now means unacceptably poor to the extent shouldn't get another game?
If you're saying shouldn't get another game then there's a million adjectives you could use as a descriptive. Ok isn't one.
I don't have any posters on ignore. Not the good ones, the average ones, the shite ones or the worst of the lot the OK ones.
OK performance = 'doesn't remotely suggest I'd be happy for him to play again' ????
Edit
'Given the circumstances' also suggests his job was made harder and you are making allowances for certain unspecified factors. Which contradicts your argument further ?
Emojis. Well done.
I think it's pretty obvious what I meant.
-
2 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:
???
I'm discussing Sadiq ing the Sadiq thread and still you want to bring other players into it ?.
How is it thick or made up to assume that a player who did ok did well enough? Ok to me is a positive comment. What is it to you, dugshite?
"Another complete wanker who knows nothing about football. Forum is a joke these days" - irony alert written all over that. Or should I say you're OK then you'll know how shite your comments really are....?
Any normal person knows what "ok given the circumstances means".
It doesn't remotely suggest I'd be happy for him to play again.
You're utterly obtuse. Please just ignore my posts. You're too thick to have a discussion with.
-
2 hours ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:
Pretty much all those things are being discussed on the various relevant threads about those players. Funnily enough it's Sadiq being discussed on the Sadiq thread.He's an easy target because he was so utterly rank. To suggest he did ok would imply you thought he was acceptable, you'd accept similar again going forward. If so that's fucking moronic, he should be moved on at the earliest opportunity without ever having the opportunity to wear and embarrass our shirt again.
So "Tav" should never wear the shirt again either?
And no it doesn't "imply" that, at all. I very clearly said "given the circimstances he did ok". Please very carefully and clearly explain to me how that means I'd "accept similar" going forward?
Either you're thick, or you're making stuff up to suit your argument. Probably both.
Another complete wanker who knows nothing about football. Forum is a joke these days.
-
2 hours ago, Bronzy said:
So is Tavernier this season's scapegoat now that Windass has left?
Cool.
It would have been better if he and Wes had left with Windass.
-
- Popular Post
Tavernier stinks of failure.
-
Centre midfielder who can pass forward woud help.
-
The accepted narrative is now that Sadiq was horrendous. He wasn't, given the circumstances he did ok. Not good, not awful, ok.
If we want to criticise someone why not talk about our spice boy club captain being unable to drop a corner or free kick into a dangerous area of the box, time and time again he either hits the first man or balloons it miles over.
Or we could talk about McGregor standing on his line when crosses are floating acceoss our 6 yard box.
Or Ryan Jack lacking the awareness to roll in Candieas for a one on one.
Or Gerrard making a cunt of selections and substitutions, again.
Sadiq is not a great player but it's fucking sad folk are so eager to pile onto a young guy who was thrown in, when people who've failed us time and time again, are far more responsible for the defeat.
He's an easy target.
-
2 minutes ago, Bronzy said:
Fair enough, I wouldn't call him slippy though tbh.
Thats more about me not liking Liverpool but yeah fair enough, don't doubt he's doing his best but he needs to sharpen up and stop repeating mistakes.
-
10 minutes ago, Bronzy said:
I'm not buying into the cult of Gerrard.He's getting some things right but a lot wrong.
-
Just an easy target. He should've been given game time before today if we knew we were going to use him. Poor management again by Slippy. I can see why he never won the Premier League in twenty years of playing for one of its biggest clubs.
-
Just now, Cedrick said:
I’ve been in the minority for 2 seasons now saying this lad gives us absolutely nothing
You've not. I know loads of people who agree he's utterly average SPL fodder. There's an element of our support who want him to be good because he left Aberdeen for us and they like his song. He's garbage.
-
1 minute ago, siddiqi_drinker said:
Our midfield, including Jack, were fine defensively but offered nothing going forward which makes Arfield on the bench an even stranger decision. He is either fit or he is not.
Arfield passes the buck and goes sideways the same way Jack does. Another very average player wildly overrated because he had one semi-reasonable season with Burnley.
-
Just now, tannerall said:
Jack shows the most awareness in the team and often breaks down potentially difficult opposition attacks simply by knowing where to be. Holds the ball well and looks for the decent pass. He impressed me again today, head and shoulders above the rest, was shocked when him and Candeias were taken off.
Clueless.
-
He's an awful player, absolutely horrendous. Sits too deep and can't pass forward. Was on the balls a lot today but that's only because he dropped back level with his centre backs the way Brown does for celtic. Easy to drop back that far and then play passes out to your full backs when the other deep has dropped and there is nobody pressing you.
Anyone that rates Jack knows fuck all about football.
-
1 hour ago, Cedrick said:
The strange thing for me is to break up a solid partnership and drop a lad who was absolutely flying , play Worrall the ayr game etc yeah fair enough but until such times Katic or Goldson go off form I’d kept it the same , same goes for Flanagan he plays every week for me , our best defender and hardly plays
I'd expect Flanagan to play midweek.
The players response
in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Posted
There's no way we'll sack him.