rossDas

After the league loss to the tims in March was the time to be showing our teeth, instead it takes 45 mins for our players to turn up and we look like spilling points all over the place.

It would be easier on them if they'd just accept that the only reason we were behind them is because of instability and poor choices, whereas for them it's probably only going to be downhill from here. They belong in our shadow.

That's right. Here's a link to the relevant section of TVLs website. http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ15

The relevant info is all on the TVL website, and I double-checked with citizen's advice before going licence-free, plus TVL didn't dispute me when I called to cancel the licence and told them why I don't need one. You're right that it's a problem for them: they have to treat every unlicenced household as a potential licence-evader, so they send out a series of increasingly ominous letters in the hope of spooking people into paying; I expect I'll receive the first of many in a few month's time. Then there's their door-knocking squad.

You wouldn't have to get rid of the equipment as merely owning a TV doesn't require a licence in the UK, it's just watching/recording live broadcasts and using iplayer that does, for the moment at least. To be on the safe side though, it's recommended to detune the set and disconnect any aerials, etc.

Retake second spot from the mutton-benders and finish the season as a cohesive side that can compete for the title.

Worth pointing out that you don't have to unless you want to legally watch live broadcasts or iplayer, but it's still ridiculous. Thankfully it's legal to watch Netflix, etc and DVDs without a licence so people have plenty of incentive not to pay.

Fuck the BBC, and fuck the licence fee.

Arkham Knight is quality.

Action areas will probably tell a different story to the possession stats. For huge swathes of the game the ball was going straight to a hivs player as soon as we got it into their half. As frustrating a performance as we're likely to see from us, but I will take it if it means three points in midst of a crisis.

As soon as the commentator for our match said they'd scored from a penalty I knew what the story would be.

It started getting routinely out of hand in the lower leagues, with the refs doing fuck-all about it and every manager doing his homework on us will see a low risk strategy to add to his game plan.

They should be given a safe standing area - i.e. standing safely outside the stadium.

Sounds to me like a load of innuendo and shite.

Ah yes, I've found what you're referring to in the article - it's in there among a load of waffle about Donald Trump, no wonder I missed it. I think it's reasonable too, as the media in this country are untrustworthy and it's prudent of us to have unaltered archive footage of press conferences in case they attempt to edit things and portray them out of context.

Unless I'm mistaken, the 'camera' reference is just a sinister sounding euphemism meaning that we made their reporting part of the conversation; in other words they seek a monopoly in driving public perception and cast aspersions on those who infringe upon that territory. They are a cancer.

Sounds to me like they don't trust their fans not to attempt a repeat of the final, so they're pre-emptively cultivating blame to pile on to our support should things kick off; how predictably Liewell-esque.

My stream is about as much use as Subo's rape alarm.

Is that example from The Vague Backpedalling Bheast's Dictionary? Because the Concise Oxford English dictionary doesn't include any definition other than: "Not conforming to, permitted by, or recognized by law or rules.".

I took the liberty of updating the Oxford English Dictionary to keep pace with the current definition of justice: Justice. 1.1 The quality of being fair and reasonable. 1.2 The administration of the law or authority in maintaining this. 2A judge or magistrate, in particular a judge of the Supreme Court of a country or state. 3 The retrospective bending of the rules in order to suit the collective adversaries of Rangers Football Club.

The coordinated sandwich eating session will be the straw that breaks the camels back.

The question is do they suck vhermin cock by choice, or is there money involved?

The best way to harm the media without feeding them is to ridicule and shame their clientele at every opportunity, particularly in online spaces. Passive aggression, i.e. boycotts only goes so far when what's really required is a social reality in which the average Joe is too embarrassed to face the checkout girl with his rancid rhag, and likewise deems it not worth the effort of posting links to the content of such publications.

They just can't stop themselves. I remember when the police had to correct their narrative that Artur Boruc had been 'cautioned for making the sign of the cross,' when in fact the footage clearly showed him trying to wind up our fans with a variety of abusive gestures. Compulsive liars, doing what comes naturally to them.

This. Like it or not we're in breach of the rules and the best outcome we can expect is some sort of warning or suspended punishment, probably with a paltry fine for incurring disciplinary procedure; any infractions beyond that point and they'll reach for the strap-on shaped like a pineapple. It's the last thing we need right now - we've got an uphill battle on our hands as it is without the support scoring own-goals and costing us money over pointless shit.