GOAT 30,449 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Am I the only one that can see him impeding shaggers arms? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TunnyLoyal 1,136 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I think it was legal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirdrieRangers 4 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 We were lucky either way but when it went in I wasnt complaining Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 McGregor catches it if Fortune doesnt touch his arms If thats not a foul, then it should stand Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maryann 0 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 who cares lol it didnt count hahahahaha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share Posted January 4, 2010 I've always said a goalkeeper has too much protection, but I wasn't complaining yesterday, it was a foul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share Posted January 4, 2010 there was contact- foul. mcgregor was impeded. mind you kyriakos scored a similar goal vs porto a few years ago and it was given Prso. Aye, that was a foul aswell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyle 3 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 put it this way if the tables were turned id be fuckin ragin that wee biased timmy cunt Charlie Nicholas actually took it quite well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinGers93 388 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 1. Costa Fortune was offside when the free-kick was took 2.He hit McGregors arm when jumping for the ball FOUL 1-1 end of Roughy from real radio and the Daily Record agree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNuts 552 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 shagger would have caught it if his left arm wasnt obstructed by fortune. goalies are overprotected. if it happened to rangers i dont know what id think to be honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colin 18 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 What goal? I watched the game and only seen skippy scoring for the scum Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithgersbear 3,225 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 For me, it should be a foul matter what era. In the 70s it might of counted but even then it shouldn't. He knocked his arm away which stopped him from catching it. It's like a full back tripping a winger up to stop him from getting to the ball after a touch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeBlue 39 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 It was a foul, although I thought it was a goal til I saw the slow mo replay.. Ps, not very often you see the words 'Fortune' and 'Goal' in the same sentence is it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iserdo 1 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 What goal? I watched the game and only seen skippy scoring for the scumso you never seen mculloch score? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share Posted January 4, 2010 Look at the back page of the sun, his arm is on shaggers shoulder. That's a foul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis 1 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 McGregors hand was knocked away by Fortune, a clear foul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alstone 374 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Other way round we would all be up in arms - no one can deny that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rugal 0 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 issni for-tune-nay? So we must have mc-greg-oray and david wee-air. issni french or something with a name like that? ah couldnae care a docken Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I think it was legal. Is taking a goalkeeprs arms away not like taking an outfield players legs away? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzas_Flute 11 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 McGregor was catching the ball easily, Fortune pushes one of his arms out of the way to prevent him from catching it. No doubt about it, correct decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iserdo 1 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 issni for-tune-nay? So we must have mc-greg-oray and david wee-air. issni french or something with a name like that? ah couldnae care a docken Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzas_Flute 11 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 You can't really dispute these. They clearly shows Fortune knocking McGregors arm out of the way preventing him making the catch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tags 1 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I think this GIF shows clearly that Conroy made a fantastic spot, instead of being berated by the media he should be praised: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iserdo 1 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 You can't really dispute these. They clearly shows Fortune knocking McGregors arm out of the way preventing him making the catch. That second 1 is very clear,so there should be no debate about it simple! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Clear foul on McGregor Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts