Suspended or Banned?

[J_RFC87 764]

Any forum with over 1000 members or so follows the same pattern:

80% don't post and lurk (or don't view at all)

10% post regularly

10% post irregularly

RM is no different. People can read the forum as they choose and we're not banning Rangers fans from enjoying RM because they don't post.

[frommetoyou 60]

I like coming on here and reading posts and opinions. I only really post on things i feel i can maybe contribute to. This is a great forum compared to others but just because some Lurk and don't post doesn't mean they've got a hidden agenda

[frommetoyou 60]

Forgot to say thats me paid up for the year.

[AdzKyle 8,598]

Nonsense!!

[Creampuff 22,630]

If people want to lurk, let them lurk.

It must hurt when the Timmy see how successful a good forum can be run.

They won't understand half of what we write anyway - they only understand rough grunts and requests to see benefit books.

[pipedown27ready 108]

People enjoy to read the articles and remain annonymous. Let them be.

[WilliamFyfe 1,438]

People enjoy to read the articles and remain annonymous. Let them be.

This

[belter 1]

WHAT a lot of p..h its a forum ffs not some sort of secret society (no anology intended),my sister in laws a member

and has never posted get a life .

[TravelingWilBEARy 4,319]

we should ban people who post too much

[simon 1,771]

This is silly, if people are just looking what harm is it doing?

[bluestilo 0]

Time someone remembered, ITS THE TIMS THAT ARE PARANOID not us

[RM Monitor And Standards Officer 112,899]

WHAT a lot of p..h its a forum ffs not some sort of secret society (no anology intended),my sister in laws a member

and has never posted get a life .

Jog on :pierre:

[TheRuleOfCool 0]

Ban anyone with over 100 posts and start again afresh with some new blood like myself.

[bombaybadboy08 15,660]

I used to be of the opinion lurkers should be banned but now i'd rather the folks that post pish were binned instead.

[JayRanger93 0]

Too many lurkers on this thread

[cooper1989 0]

Some just like to read and not post..... use the site as news, rumours etc... Why feel the need to ban them? A curious position.

[lochinver-bear 2]

just to throw my tuppence worth in , i have been a member for quite a while now but havnt posted regularly for a bit but i still enjoy reading everyones opinion and getting the latest news from a site that is a lot faster than the official one lol

hopefully i will get back to being a regular one day soon

[ChrisVanDarche 23]

I might not have posted for a year in the past, as I just didn't have the time to spend on here. Some topics I will also just read to see the variety of opinions, and won't bother posting myself. Don't think people should be banned for not posting.

[A Horse With No Name 27]

No doubt they'll still be holidaying in the seychelles so give them a bit more time!

I might go and stay in the States myself soon - you know how it is looking to increase my Investment Portfolio... :pierre:

[bigandy999 1]

This is the biggest load of twaddle ever.

[lewisrfc93 470]

Other

[Shearer 124]

How about we leave things as they are, it has worked pretty well for the site so far...

[*Manticore* 1,893]

We should ban people who use textspeak.

[pjrocks51 0]

I've been a meber for a while, this is my first post as I normally just come on here to catchup with whats going on at the club.

[Strayk9 3]

Anyone with 41 posts or less should be whipped across the eyes with a knotted rope soaked in pish.

(probably funnier when my post count was 41 )