Boab 73 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 Wilson hand ball in the second half? My mate said that if he was a big Rangers fan then he would have been really claiming it in a big way as I wasn't convinced. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chambo 197 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 Stone waller.Hand way up in the air, it has to be a pen! However Miller should have buried the chance directly after! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.Linton 107 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 was it wilson i thought it was o'dea? and defo pen anyways his arm came out from his body! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfajerk 23 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 clear penalty! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,730 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 I think the ref played some kind of advantage tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,556 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 It was a penalty, his hand was away from his body and directly impeded the path of the ball.Doesn't matter that Miller should have buried the resultant chance ... it was definately a penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandymcm 25 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 without a doubt! a clear penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chambo 197 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 It was a penalty, his hand was away from his body and directly impeded the path of the ball.Doesn't matter that Miller should have buried the resultant chance ... it was definately a penalty.I agree. I was only pointing out that if he buried the chance we wouldn't be talking about it.Definite penalty though! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 A clear penalty..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 It should have been a penalty, the ref technically played advantage, and if Miller had scored the goal then we would have been screaming if it was brought back for a penalty, whistle being blown and all that.On the other hand though, when there has been an incident in other parts of the park sometimes a ref will see if there is an advantage to be played first, if not, he will then blow and call it back for the free kick, again it could be argued that technically because Miller didn't score the goal there was no advantage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboyrfc 296 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 Miler should have buried the follow-upBut was it a penalty? one of the clearest ones i have seen this season.Regardless of "he couldn't get out the way" or any of that fucking pish, his hand was out from his body and he influenced the flight/direction of the ball in the box = penalty.Remember Barca's disallowed goal at the end of the game with Inter? Hand ball given against Toure (?) before Bojan finished it off. That was given as a free kick and it was less of a hand ball than this was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozblue 4,331 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 That was a clear penalty by todays refereeing standards.It was a more obvious penalty than the one Lyon got against Bordeaux in the CL. quarter final 1st leg.Now if the Ref played the advantage rule as some suggest he did ( which is the correct decision ) and Miller had scored, then the goal would have stood.When Miller hit the post, then the correct decision would have been to award the penalty kick.The problem in football is that there is no consistency at all these days with Referees and it's always explained as..."In the Referees opinion" which gets them out of jail when people get puzzled and angry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muz333 361 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 It was a penalty without a shadow of a doubt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tufts1690 75 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 the referee was piss poor and shit himself on several occasions lastnight. not like it matters though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenose andy 1 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 Definite penalty Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangers4eva 12 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 Thought it was a penalty, don't think the ref played advantage though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Soprano 13,964 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 Just imagine it was the other way around and the Scum had been denied it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muz333 361 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 PictureHand out from his body and high up clearing blocking the ball. The only explanation is the ref bottled it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangers4eva 12 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 Anyone smell something vile Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dietspam 733 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 The way i see it the player jumped to block the cross. That's fine. However, his hands were not only out, but moved up after the ball was kicked. So this was 100% hand to ball. I'm not sure on the Refs position or where the linesman was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey_RFC 122 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 You can play advantage on a penalty? Stone waller. How I can see it on a shitey projector screen, in a packed pub and after a few pints but the referee can't from 10 yards away is a mystery! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tufts1690 75 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 anyone else smell shite? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamFyfe 1,438 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 Yes, ref shat out it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilRFC 10 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 I have seen penalties given for less...O'Dea knew what he was doing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 You can play advantage on a penalty? Stone waller. How I can see it on a shitey projector screen, in a packed pub and after a few pints but the referee can't from 10 yards away is a mystery!Technically yes, because Miller still had a chance to score a goal, so you could say he was playing advantage, but as he didn't score and therefore no advantage he should have then awarded the penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts