gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 Correct. And they would have done if it was true.so darrell story which to this day is still on the herald website must be true? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT 8,293 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 It was a betting banning than I first thought.Thats for sure Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 Too much squabbling going on.The website dropped the story so that in itself probably means it was inaccurate.We cannot read too much into the rest of the stuff being suggested until it becomes much clearer what has happened. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,606 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 why cwoodloyal broke the story of whyte on here and frankie seemed to have the inside track.Never saw saw any evidence anyone had a clue what was going on at the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,606 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 if we are saying that form. which we have all seen is a fake then that's a game changerWhat forms this ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 the one the article is about Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry handsome 629 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 Is this all speculation or have we been told by Rangers that they have actually challenged the PAPEr and banned Jackson.If and thats a BIG if they have, wheres the statement.I would be one very happy bear if they have and as many have said its about time, however the singapore slinger has a point, its a cheap win.As Jimmy Sanderson used to say, are you sitting on the fence, i am. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 rangers have denied nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 so there is no form. because thats really all the article said. that and. some fan they quoted who was concerned.Thats not all it really said though. Firstly it called the form an MG50, which was completely wrong and it stated in MASSIVE WRITING:"COISTY CASH CRISIS""Gers boss still in the dark as Whyte looks set to follow borrowing plan that nearly killed Leeds"As you have RIGHTLY argued on here, that is only an Interpretation of the document. Perhaps this is evidence that this interpretation is wrong hence why Craig Whyte has put the foot down.I certainly hope so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 so the stramash is because they got the name of the form wrong loooooooooooooool Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 so the stramash is because they got the name of the form wrong looooooooooooooolDid you not read the rest ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SasaFknPapac 9 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 rangers have denied nothing.They have nothing to deny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 Did you not read the rest ? hardly actionable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissg910 110 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 people wanted a statement about this story from mr whytewhere i come from ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS!!!!!QUEERS NEXT PLS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 queer won't criticise whyte. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 I got the record out and read it again. I still say its a perfectly reasonable article that raises some concerns I have seen on ever major rangers forum. headline is sensationalised as ever of course.if rangers deny it then fair enough. at least the record is asking the question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 my guess is stab in back.Putting your apparent disappointment over the story being killed to one side, why would you 'guess' someone senior to Jackson chose to 'stab in back'?Stories being killed after publication is a rare enough occurrence (rarer still for it to happen to a senior journalist) and the Record would be fully aware of how this is going to look for the paper and Jackson.There was surely something seriously wrong in his story for this to happen at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 perhaps it was a virus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 perhaps it was a virus.So, you have nothing to add of substance as to why the Record decided to hang a senior journalist out to dry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 when they do I might. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 so to sum up. nothing has changed since yesterday. we still don't know what this forms about and everyone on here now loves grandmaster suck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 so to sum up. nothing has changed since yesterday. we still don't know what this forms about and everyone on here now loves grandmaster suck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffbear 4,096 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 Rangers are backNo Surrender Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chesh 28 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 I've missed the qrticle what was it about? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffbear 4,096 Posted June 15, 2011 Share Posted June 15, 2011 so to sum up. nothing has changed since yesterday. we still don't know what this forms about and everyone on here now loves grandmaster suck.Why are you so concerned about this and why have you a major bee in your bonnet about Craig Whyte.Can't you be optimistic for once and maybe see the likes of AJ and Bain were looking after number 1 and not the best interests of the club...maybe they were the Charlatans and not Whyte. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts