lanbrox 10 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 no doubt they will say the ebt scheme was in place when they took over etc etc. as for Mr whyte the judge seems to have been quite scathing.Yes, but he would not have been under such scrutiny and all the publicity if he were not the owner of RFC and if you go down the conspiracy road, would the pursuer have agreed to an out of court settlement, if not being spurned on by 'others' not do so?Also, when you look at Dermot, the scum majority shareholder and recently resigned as Chairman (I wonder why?), this guys deals and court cases would put the Vatican bank to shame in his business dealings. Yet not a word! Very recently he and his two taig pals who own Castlebeck who run a chain of care homes accross the UK are under ivestigation for defrauding the government and systematic abuse of patients (in their blood obviously). Three of their employees were found guilty of abuse yesterday, with many more still to stand trial.Now, in the grand schemme of things which story is more noteworthy and more in the public interest and for even greater local interest his scum fc connection. Not fucking hard to come to a conclusion is it?!Even handedness, certainly NOT now in Scotland and most certainly NOT at the scum BBC.Too many have appeased these Rangers and Protestant haters for too long!NO SURRENDER! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I don't trust aj or his intentions and I can't fully trust whyte, what I do know is one person acted to purchase rangers and one did fekk all Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimgers 565 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 What a mess.Did anyone do their due diligence in the takeover? Especially the former Chairman...Alastair Johnston? I'm beginning to think there was never any real due diligence done, Whyte was passed muster with a nod and a wink from Murray, for some reason that will no doubt come out in the wash. Now that Murray has come out and spoken about "clarification"Somebody has already said it takes a thief to catch a thief. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Yes, but he would not have been under such scrutiny and all the publicity if he were not the owner of RFC and if you go down the conspiracy road, would the pursuer have agreed to an out of court settlement, if not being spurned on by 'others' not do so?Also, when you look at Dermot, the scum majority shareholder and recently resigned as Chairman (I wonder why?), this guys deals and court cases would put the Vatican bank to shame in his business dealings. Yet not a word! Very recently he and his two taig pals who own Castlebeck who run a chain of care homes accross the UK are under ivestigation for defrauding the government and systematic abuse of patients (in their blood obviously). Three of their employees were found guilty of abuse yesterday, with many more still to stand trial.Now, in the grand schemme of things which story is more noteworthy and more in the public interest and for even greater local interest his scum fc connection. Not fucking hard to come to a conclusion is it?!Even handedness, certainly NOT now in Scotland and most certainly NOT at the scum BBC.Too many have appeased these Rangers and Protestant haters for too long!NO SURRENDER!is be surprised if desmond was in court and it was ignored. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 What a mess.Did anyone do their due diligence in the takeover? Especially the former Chairman...Alastair Johnston? whyte failed aj's due diligence. we've always known that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanbrox 10 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 is be surprised if desmond was in court and it was ignored.Google him with crimes etc! Lot's of previous and got away with it all due to his connection with Haughey the roi, which in the end, this close relationship was Haughey's undoing. Early in the relationship, Haughey sold off government land to him for a song and he in return was looked after as it was uncovered later Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 whyte failed aj's due diligence. we've always known that.You've managed to use "AJ" and "diligence" in the same sentence. You're amazing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 What a mess.Did anyone do their due diligence in the takeover? Especially the former Chairman...Alastair Johnston? Surely due diligence couldn't amount to a bank statement from Whyte's company with £20m+ which was deposited by a company on the basis of assets which he didn't have access to at the time? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 that's like praising a pedo priest for running a youth club if this is true. yeah he's the only one who stepped forward. no wonder if he's done what is suggested. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 But is Whyte an even Bigger liar? At least under them we had a team on the park Whyte is asset stripping RangersThere's the asset stripping again! Care to explain how it works and how Whyte is going to benefit? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 You've managed to use "AJ" and "diligence" in the same sentence. You're amazing. so did jadams I think. he's the real genius. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 There's the asset stripping again! Care to explain how it works and how Whyte is going to benefit?here's the theory. whyte paid a quid for us. he borrowed millions and paid of lloyds. he's owed the lloyds cash if we go under. he puts us under or better hmrc do. he sells what he can and if its more than a quid he's made money. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Just a question on the Due diligence by Murray. What is a sellers obligation in due diligence. You have an asset, you want to sell it, somebody wants to buy it, you sell it.Of course Lloyds would want to know they were getting their £18m and therefore a statement would suffice. Does a seller have any more legal obligations ?Im not sure they do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 157 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Surely due diligence couldn't amount to a bank statement from Whyte's company with £20m+ which was deposited by a company on the basis of assets which he didn't have access to at the time?Ably assisted by a club director with a vested financial interest in a takeover taking place perhaps.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Murray set up the ibc to ensure the buyer was correct for rangers. they passed judgment that whyte wasn't. if he isn't then just look to lloyds and sdm for your culprits. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Ably assisted by a club director with a vested financial interest in a takeover taking place perhaps.... ah my favorite. Mr muir. wouldn't surprise me one bit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 here's the theory. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 157 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 ah my favorite. Mr muir. wouldn't surprise me one bit.You may think that, I couldn't possibly comment... Couple more big stories to break over the weekend, not looking good for Mr Whyte and some of those who smoothed his path. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregor Stevens Fan Club 42 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Murray set up the ibc to ensure the buyer was correct for rangers. they passed judgment that whyte wasn't. if he isn't then just look to lloyds and sdm for your culprits.Bingo (although I'd say it was more Lloyds than Murray). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanbrox 10 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Was AJ no the bloke that invented that wanking machine? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 its not a theory I subscribe to I must admitt. I think Mr whytes seen a chance to own rangers on the cheep if he was prepared to get his hands very dirty over the tax case. I expect he will still be here in the medium term. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weird_Beard 99 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Bingo (although I'd say it was more Lloyds than Murray).Yes, AJ said don't do it, Murray said it's too late, LLoyds where going to pull the plug. Apparently. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 You may think that, I couldn't possibly comment... Couple more big stories to break over the weekend, not looking good for Mr Whyte and some of those who smoothed his path.care to elaborate on the last parragraph forlan?Do you actually know something or is it just scaremongering? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 here's the theory. whyte paid a quid for us. he borrowed millions and paid of lloyds. he's owed the lloyds cash if we go under. he puts us under or better hmrc do. he sells what he can and if its more than a quid he's made money.um? thats not asset stripping? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Yes, AJ said don't do it, Murray said it's too late, LLoyds where going to pull the plug. Apparently.Mr muir said ill find you a buyer no matter what. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.