caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Whiich is why he needs to be clearer in his posts, the cryptic bullshit gets us nowhere.Not saying he knows nothing mate, just want more info.I do too....certain others appear not to. If he posts something that will be happening soon, he will get slaughtered for it and labelled a taig. It's happened already. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I do too....certain others appear not to. If he posts something that will be happening soon, he will get slaughtered for it and labelled a taig. It's happened already.I doubt that will happen again Casey. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 May be no obligation in law, more to do with Murray's avowed intent to find the most suitable buyer, so you'd expect a bit of digging around on SDM/AJ's partDig around or piss off into the sunset leaving a potential ticking bomb behind.......ah bet it there was a huge amount of scrutiny of Whyte eh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 yeah I was just explaining the theory as I understand it. I've seen pretty woman I know what asset stripping is.Pretty woman? wtf? Ok, on that (assets not Pretty Woman)Which assets did murray actually leave us? As, he seems to have already stripped out the important ones Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Dig around or piss off into the sunset leaving a potential ticking bomb behind.......ah bet it there was a huge amount of scrutiny of Whyte eh. I believe however, he should have dug a bit more, especially as to tax liabilities. It does appear HMRC, if they cant claim back what they want, can go after former directors/owners etcThat would certainly make things more interesting Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I do too....certain others appear not to. If he posts something that will be happening soon, he will get slaughtered for it and labelled a taig. It's happened already.Its pretty clear he isnt a taig, more a terminal pessimist If he is not gonna elaborate on the post then it screams attention seeker IMO.Tell us what u know forlan, otherwise you can just pick the next negative story in the papers and say "see i told ya so" Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
californiadreamin52 339 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Definition of 'Asset Stripping'The process of buying an undervalued company with the intent to sell off its assets for a profit. The individual assets of the company, such as its equipment and property, may be more valuable than the company as a whole due to such factors as poor management or poor economic conditions. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Its pretty clear he isnt a taig, more a terminal pessimist If he is not gonna elaborate on the post then it screams attention seeker IMO.Tell us what u know forlan, otherwise you can just pick the next negative story in the papers and say "see i told ya so"Doubt him all you want - I wouldn't expect him to be heartbroken! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Doubt him all you want - I wouldn't expect him to be heartbroken! It honestly isnt a case of doubting him, i just hate the "I know something you dont know" tone of the post lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Definition of 'Asset Stripping'The process of buying an undervalued company with the intent to sell off its assets for a profit. The individual assets of the company, such as its equipment and property, may be more valuable than the company as a whole due to such factors as poor management or poor economic conditions.So we're not going into administration? What would you say our assets are worth versus the value of the company (post tax verdict)? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HG5 11,113 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Dig around or piss off into the sunset leaving a potential ticking bomb behind.......ah bet it there was a huge amount of scrutiny of Whyte eh. Maybe just making noises about doing the right thing?Wouldn't be entirely out of character......... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I doubt that will happen again Casey.Not by the wise among us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I do too....certain others appear not to. If he posts something that will be happening soon, he will get slaughtered for it and labelled a taig. It's happened already.Forlanssister is a Rangers fan. Anyone bandying about other allegations will be dealt with. Folk can agree or disagree with him as they wish; but if it's the latter, don't accuse him of being from the dark side. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Pretty woman? wtf? Ok, on that (assets not Pretty Woman)Which assets did murray actually leave us? As, he seems to have already stripped out the important oneswhytes found a couple to pawn. catering and season books. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Not by the wise among us. Aye but theres only 3 of us...whit about the others ?PS They were looking for a saviour as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Forlanssister is a Rangers fan. Anyone bandying about other allegations will be dealt with. Folk can agree or disagree with him as they wish; but if it's the latter, don't accuse him of being from the dark side. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 whytes found a couple to pawn. catering and season books.He was also selling knock off jerseys to Sports Direct today. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Beware of what you wish for: Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Beware of what you wish for:The words "frying pan" and "fire" spring to mind boss.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 157 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 It is well worth reading the Sheriff Ross's rather damning report of the One Stop v Tixway case and in particular the rather strange goings on regarding both incarnations of Snowcast and how Craig Whyte treated them, it gives an insight as to how he goes about his business.If similar shenanigans have been repeated at our club then even my scepticism may not have gone far enough.The judgement is a matter of public record so do your own digging it's 39 pages and worth the effort if these kind of things are of interest to you. Yes there is a lot more to come out, the weekend should be interesting especially if you have an open mind, at least one perhaps two stories.Not confident enough in the actual content of the stories to reveal any more at this stage.Believe or not, won't put me up nor down. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 The words "frying pan" and "fire" spring to mind boss....The attacks on Whyte appear to be giving the vendor an opportunity to relieve Whyte of the Club should he wish to do so. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudsLonniegan 9 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 No, because it is a liability. The liability is ours whilst we exist.How is it a liability, we sold them tickets or maybe we just gave them to them and decided we would pay millions for the joy of it. Or irrespective of who has underwritten the loan we never got cos it was a sale, we still end up with the mysterious liability for a sale. FFS even Gordon Gekko couldn't have come up with that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weird_Beard 99 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 It is well worth reading the Sheriff Ross's rather damning report of the One Stop v Tixway case and in particular the rather strange goings on regarding both incarnations of Snowcast and how Craig Whyte treated them, it gives an insight as to how he goes about his business.If similar shenanigans have been repeated at our club then even my scepticism may not have gone far enough.The judgement is a matter of public record so do your own digging it's 39 pages and worth the effort if these kind of things are of interest to you. Yes there is a lot more to come out, the weekend should be interesting especially if you have an open mind, at least one perhaps two stories.Not confident enough in the actual content of the stories to reveal any more at this stage.Believe or not, won't put me up nor down.Where did you find the report? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 It is well worth reading the Sheriff Ross's rather damning report of the One Stop v Tixway case and in particular the rather strange goings on regarding both incarnations of Snowcast and how Craig Whyte treated them, it gives an insight as to how he goes about his business.If similar shenanigans have been repeated at our club then even my scepticism may not have gone far enough.The judgement is a matter of public record so do your own digging it's 39 pages and worth the effort if these kind of things are of interest to you. Yes there is a lot more to come out, the weekend should be interesting especially if you have an open mind, at least one perhaps two stories.Not confident enough in the actual content of the stories to reveal any more at this stage.Believe or not, won't put me up nor down.fair enough, thanks for expanding a wee bit Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 157 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Where did you find the report?Get your own sources !! Matter of public record now, not 100% sure if it's online yet or not but imagine with the interest in it should be widely available soon enough. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.