bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Please correct me if I'm wrong.You're wrong. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NessFTW 40 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 That's ridiculous. Of course some rules are more strictly adhered to and acted on than others. Similar reasons that a court would give for not punishing a petty thief to life imprisonment.Let's say, for the sake of argument, that a poster broke a reasonably serious rule. They are warned about that by PM, accept that they've broken the rule, apologise and say it won't happen again. A couple of weeks later, they break the same serious rule. Is a 24-hour posting suspension too harsh? Just right? Not harsh enough?Hypothetically speaking, of course.So what is this serious rule?Iit's not a hard question, just give a straight answer. Why isn't it in CAPS and labelled as "serious rule" if it's so important? How are we supposed to know which rules are serious and which are minor infractions? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NessFTW 40 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 You're wrong.So predictable, I said correct me if I'm wrong not tell me Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 So what is this serious rule?Iit's not a hard question, just give a straight answer. Why isn't it in CAPS and labelled as "serious rule" if it's so important? How are we supposed to know which rules are serious and which are minor infractions?Don't break any of them, then you'll be fine.The only person who needs to know why shorerdbear had his posting rights suspended is shorerdbear, and he knows. This didn't happen instantly, the issue was discussed with him when he broke it first and he accepted that and promised not to do it again.Not sure how to make this more clear, but I'm not going to tell you what he was suspended for. He can if he likes, his posting rights are restored. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 So predictable, I said correct me if I'm wrong not tell me And you seriously expected me to? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 mudslinger is deadlong live caseyjones My spelling takes offence at that remark. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Anyway, this thread gets back on topic or it gets locked. I've been as clear as I'm going to be, shorerdbear's suspension was discussed with him and him alone.There were some questions a few pages back, have they been answered yet? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 The ban for shorerdbear was for posting information which could lead to another poster having his identity disclosed. He did this whilst disputing a point that was put forward regarding the whereabouts of the Gersave funds.So beware! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wreckedroy 33 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Good. If that's the case then he deserved a days rest.Now.........about these accounts? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NessFTW 40 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Good. If that's the case then he deserved a days rest.Now.........about these accounts? What accounts? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted March 16, 2012 Author Share Posted March 16, 2012 Back to the questions. One thing I'm pretty damn sure about is that by continuing to use the name of an FSA registered company they have not dealt with since 2010 is a breach of FSA regulations and as such could land them a significant fine. It's strange that even when it has been pointed out to them, a simple text change has not been carried out on their site. One wonders if there is a reason for that? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Good. If that's the case then he deserved a days rest.Now.........about these accounts? He didn't divulge anything that wasn't already known, but I agree that it shouldn't happen. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Back to the questions. One thing I'm pretty damn sure about is that by continuing to use the name of an FSA registered company they have not dealt with since 2010 is a breach of FSA regulations and as such could land them a significant fine. It's strange that even when it has been pointed out to them, a simple text change has not been carried out on their site. One wonders if there is a reason for that?Ask the RST. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Hubbard 280 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 So predictable, I said correct me if I'm wrong not tell me you invented typex right ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 I agree. As long as the RST stop posturing for a position on our Board then. RST policies will continue to be made by RST members, so thanks for your comments but they don't matter Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 I'm sure it would I assume you're a member of this fine establishment then. Sound like friendly folk.You shouldn't assume, it makes you look foolish. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stfu 596 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 RST policies will continue to be made by "certain" RST members, so thanks for your comments but they don't matter Fixed that for you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 No you didn't Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 The ban for shorerdbear was for posting information which could lead to another poster having his identity disclosed. He did this whilst disputing a point that was put forward regarding the whereabouts of the Gersave funds.So beware!How the fuck am I gonny find oot whit the Rhecord headlines are the morra? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 How the fuck am I gonny find oot whit the Rhecord headlines are the morra?Did shorerdbear usually tell you? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Did shorerdbear usually tell you?Naw. gunswinger. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Naw. gunswinger.I'm sure he will pm them to you if you ask nicely. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,719 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 27 pages of unadulterated pish charlotte1008 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 27 pages of unadulterated pish You been searching your posts again, jim? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 27 pages of unadulterated pish Nice tae see you addin your contribution...............................o pish. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.