scottyc06 6,927 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 So let me just get this right before we all lose the rag.This 2 match ban is for his comments RE: Collum and Kilmarnock cup final.He got away with the incidents at Ibrox due to inconsistencies in the referee/4th officials report.He is still to face charges for both his run onto the pitch and twitter comments after the Hearts game.Is that right?Almost, he gets away with the Ibrox sendin off because he has had punishment enough by being sent to the stand for the 2nd half! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AW-WATP 112 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Cunt. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CottonRunt 1,026 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 I believe so yes Then i sort of dont know why people are freaking out.Yes the decision RE: Ibrox incident is a bit ridiculous, but by no means unreasonable.2 game ban for his comments on Collum is probably about right.And he should get a considerable ban for both his suggestion that ref's decisions are "personal" and the the sfa is corrupt (published on his twitter)as well as him running onto the pitch to berate the referee.However, if the allegations that a member of the Celtic legal team did a "deal" with Vincent Lunny outside the hearing, then that should be fully investigated and Lunny should probably lose his job. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangers_1993 68 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Even this two game ban will be personal to Neil LennonWas talking to my lecturer at college (who's a hearts fan) his exact words were "Lennon should not be a manager should hes nothing but a vile man and pure evil" ps wonder where they stupid 17 game bans for Lennon stories came from ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CottonRunt 1,026 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Almost, he gets away with the Ibrox sendin off because he has had punishment enough by being sent to the stand for the 2nd half!Sounds similar to the excuse used when a player dives.I.e if they get a yellow card for diving in a game (or if it doesn't influence the outcome of the match i.e diving for a penalty) then no further action can be taken against them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbo 588 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Then i sort of dont know why people are freaking out.Yes the decision RE: Ibrox incident is a bit ridiculous, but by no means unreasonable.2 game ban for his comments on Collum is probably about right.And he should get a considerable ban for both his suggestion that ref's decisions are "personal" and the the sfa is corrupt (published on his twitter)as well as him running onto the pitch to berate the referee.However, if the allegations that a member of the Celtic legal team did a "deal" with Vincent Lunny outside the hearing, then that should be fully investigated and Lunny should probably lose his job.I'd agree with every word of that.The more serious punishment will undoubtedly be metted out for alleging bias against the officials rather than incompetence and for rushing onto the pitch at Hampden against Hearts Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky_ 893 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Even this two game ban will be personal to Neil LennonWas talking to my lecturer at college (who's a hearts fan) his exact words were "Lennon should not be a manager should hes nothing but a vile man and pure evil" ps wonder where they stupid 17 game bans for Lennon stories came from ?the 17 match ban was tabloid speculation in the exact same vein that we owe the tax man nearly 100 million.in both cases, the media have thought, right, lets take note of every possible offence and list it out, then we can look at other penalties that can be applied, and add them on.so with our tax case, they have added on maximum possible penalties, legal fees, and interest on the amount to come to a sensationalised figure.with lennon they have said ok, he coudl possible get a 3 game ban for each offence, then ebcause of multiple offences, he could get a few more for multiple offences. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottyc06 6,927 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Surely his twitter comments are bringing the game into disrepute and should be treated the same way we have been treated on 'bringing the game into disrepute' also the fact that it will be his 4th hearing in the space of 2 weeks he has to get hammered both with bans and financially!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver Fox 167 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Initial indications from phone ins and so called pundits are that Celtic must go after the ''corrupt '' referee or linesman who '' lied '' in their reports, this anti celtic bigot must be sacked a la dallas. Let them whinge crying wolf far far too often now for any of these deluded paranoid tarriers to ever be taken seriously Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue68 2,497 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Still seen as the victim when the ref was the victim. The politically correct brigade run the SFA as well now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben10 2,298 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 He should be chased out of the country. He sat out the second-half of the Ibrox game because he doesn't belong in the company of respectable, tolerant and decent men who clean themselves regularly. A man like lennon simply does not belong in the directors box at Ibrox, he's not welcome on our TV screens and he doesn't deserve to be a football manager. Because he doesn't act or intend to act like one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibroxblue 131 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 I just want to emphasise that Lennon was found guilty on both charges today. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
corkinator 611 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Ha ha ha, ffs, did anyone expect anything different? Sfa are a fucking joke, really A FUCKIN MASSIVE JOKE. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERCOOPER 117 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Simples - the SFA are pussees and are scared of him. Any other manager (not that any other manager would act like that fanny) and the book would have been thrown at him Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueshoff 12,822 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 I think the implications of the hearing will have much more profound effects on the game in Scotland. In a couple of years time there will be no semi-decent quality referees left in the game, all that willbe left will be people with an agenda or those desperate for fame or a couple of hundred quid for the weekend. The standard is pretty shocking now but it's going to get much worse Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky_ 893 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Simples - the SFA are pussees and are scared of him. Any other manager (not that any other manager would act like that fanny) and the book would have been thrown at himthis is exactly it. they cunts are terrified of celtic.the SFA have set a precedent. Next time a manager gets sent to the stands, they can claim that getting sent to the stands was punishment enough and shouldnt receive any further ban. If they do, they can kick up fuck. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HG5 12,237 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Interesting it was the bheggar loving Brines who stepped up to the plate to provide the 'conflicting' evidence..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris182 6,531 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 The SFA have still to decide on last weekend's acts of wankery Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iain1712 336 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 This has happened because sellik dug up another Q.C. To represent him. At this level in the legal profession they are used to defending the indefensible i.e. Murderers rapists Peados etc.In doing this sometimes their only defence is closely studying the prosecusions evidence for inconsistancies (sp) or even a stray word said by any witnesses when testifying they then try to spin this out to make a reasonable doubt in the jury's mind and/or imply that the person is lying. I hope it becomes public knowledge what the inconsistancies in the refs and fourth official's reports where? something trivial I would bet. It's clear that the sfa have no stomach for a fight when confronted by the 'heavyweight' legal representation employed by the scum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madina 4,245 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 The SFA had a chance to lay down a precident and send out the message that that sort of behaviour will not be tolerated. They fucking bottled it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,288 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 In almost every walk of life repeat offenders are punshed more severely but in Scottish football they are treated more leniently ... no wonder this character feels free to cause as much mayhem as possible Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iain1712 336 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 I can see a witch-hunt against the two refs being started by the hard of thinking tarriers. Quickly followed by another referee strike. By being weak the sfa have hung their refs out to dry again Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StewGer 606 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 It remains to be seen how the other charges are handled, if he gets off then I hope the refs all walk away. Weakest fucking paymasters in the business when it comes to the scum and a complete lack of consistency with everyone else. How fucking hard is it? I could get 3 or 4 people together and do a better fucking job tomorrow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wearethepeople1 3,897 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 He is a fucking wankerThe day he is gone will be a joyous day Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,389 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 2 match ban starting immediatley, surprise surpirse, they've nothing left to play for except the game against us.Hope they drop a few points though, it will show just how tainted their title is Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.