GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Sign him on amateur forms or something?sssshhhhh.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,789 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Decision from who? The court of session? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmytto 220 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 you are incorrect, the judge has already said if he rules in favour of Rangers it goes back to the SFA to give a punsihment they are legally allowed to give, he will not quash the ban. How the SFA will react to this is currently unknown.If he rules in favour of Rangers then he is acknowledging that the 'ban' is not legal, and therefore the SFA will not be able to enforce it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Taig.Quite clearly....How long would a rangers fan posting pish on a celtic site called "sellick" last.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilko89 507 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 you are incorrect, the judge has already said if he rules in favour of Rangers it goes back to the SFA to give a punsihment they are legally allowed to give, he will not quash the ban. How the SFA will react to this is currently unknown.Sorry mate I should have written it better. If you look above I actually agree with you. What I meant was that it WILL go back to an SFA tribunal but I think after taking a skelping in court, they will overturn their original ban through embarrassment. Just my opinion though. At least now they can say they tried to punish us to the Rangers haters but were overturned in court. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 If he rules in favour of Rangers then he is acknowledging that the 'ban' is not legal, and therefore the SFA will not be able to enforce it.Possibly so but it could land us in a heap of other shit..depends the way the SFA choose to play it. I would expect them to accept the ruling and punish us in a way explicitly stated in the rules but you never know Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Rules are made to be broken (*See Italian football, seasons 1948-through-2012.....etc) Yours, Don Corleone Bacon Haw don...i don't believe DaRangerz is a friend of ours...... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SC1312 153 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Quite clearly....How long would a rangers fan posting pish on a celtic site called "sellick" last.... His latest thread is something along the lines of "6 days till the money runs out" Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
islandblue 366 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 If he rules in favour of Rangers then he is acknowledging that the 'ban' is not legal, and therefore the SFA will not be able to enforce it.Correct they must accept this but can impose an alternative sanction whether greater or less we will see Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilko89 507 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Correct they must accept this but can impose an alternative sanction whether greater or less we will seeThink the greater punishment would be expulsion from the league and I really don't think they will do that, with the amount of money we bring them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHAMPS4LIFE 86 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 prob hit us with a 200,000 fine instead Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ace1 49 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 prob hit us with a 200,000 fine insteadOoh! 20p in the £ then yeah? SFA a creditor, who'd of thunk it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamMunny 3,237 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 If its overturned they will make up another rule that will anger us more Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Think the greater punishment would be expulsion from the league and I really don't think they will do that, with the amount of money we bring them.They have already stated that what we did didn't equal expulsion, they would look even dafter if they did that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilko89 507 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 They have already stated that what we did didn't equal expulsion, they would look even dafter if they did that.Mate, its the SFA we're dealing with here Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilko89 507 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Ooh! 20p in the £ then yeah? SFA a creditor, who'd of thunk it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marvinsmarvels 13 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Sign him on amateur forms or something?what part of we cant sign anyone we are in administration don't you understand. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHAMPS4LIFE 86 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 If its overturned they will make up another rule that will anger us morethey will strip us of our R to show how they feel about us lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,361 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Sign him on amateur forms or something?WHILE WE ARE IN ADMINISTRATION WE CAN'T SIGN ANYONE. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rfc#1. 1,877 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 If we win they'll still punish us, but they will only be able to use punishments already in place not quickly made up ones with no precedent. But I have no idea how this will go, at least we'll know at 3:30. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delamonty 992 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 If we win they'll still punish us, but they will only be able to use punishments already in place not quickly made up ones with no precedent. But I have no idea how this will go, at least we'll know at 3:30.What's available as punishment? Expulsion (non starter) or a fine? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgruntled_bear 157 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Atleast we'll get a decision today. One question though.... If we lose this court case is this the end of us trying to overturn it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Haw don...i don't believe DaRangerz is a friend of ours...... I'll have a 'hit' put on him then. It's strictly business. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 'DaRangerz' - he should be banned for that username alone. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilko89 507 Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 Atleast we'll get a decision today. One question though.... If we lose this court case is this the end of us trying to overturn it?I think so mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.