BTC - Rangers win the appeal

[RFC55 109,196]

As Badger says this raises some massive questions!

[AGM_72 3,650]

Well, what are the implications?

The big tax case is the main reason the old company went of business. It is the main reason Lloyds forced the sale, and played hard with us. It is the reason Whyte didn't bother with paying tax, knowing that if we lost it we'd of been out of business.

,

If we win the tax case, then a lot of people have a lot of explaining to do, because we're now a newco, in the third division, and had our reputation dragged through the mud, over an issue we we are completely innocent on!

Indeed, if true, the old company has went out of business for no good reason!

Well, that's what I mean.

Assuming this is true, the process can hardly be reversed, can it? Where do we even start to aim our counter-attacks at?

[irish_ranger 5]

Can't look back now.

CW fucked us, them are the breaks.

We know we didn't do wrong and the draconian punishments were/are a fecking joke. Strip titles?

Aye try it if this is ture.

Corrupt wankers.

Whats done is done but strangely if we do win this thing I think I'll be even more angry than I was ever over the last year

[nelsonRFC82 305]

If true, not sure how to take it. Should be a big help in fight to keep titles and a big fuck you to the sporting integrity brigade.

But leaves a sickening taste that everything with that cunt Whyte could, should & would have been avoided!

That said, I want our name cleared. I want our fairly won titles to be vindicated...and will just have to use this injustice to reinforce our battle back to the top which will be even sweeter!

[Dado-9 0]

We have been unable to reach a unanimous view. The following decision represents the joint (majority) opinion of Mr Mure and Mr Rae. All references to the Tribunal’s views and inferences therein should be construed as referring to their views only. The dissenting opinion of Dr Poon is added as an Appendix

5 and should be read independently.

[Big Al 55 9,279]

Big Big IF, if true;

The OLD Co hasn't been officially liquidated yet, is it possible or desirable to merge the two again, al'a Bill Miller's plan?

[Choccymandela 10]

If this is true then we should go for the throat of every cunt who has dragged our clubs name through the mud, there should be no hiding place for them.

[LeeWallaceRFC 3,920]

.

[RFC55 109,196]

Big Big IF, if true;

The OLD Co hasn't been officially liquidated yet, is it possible or desirable to merge the two again, al'a Bill Miller's plan?

Its true now! Its been released Rangers have won

[cstamomusa 3,811]

If this is true its a freaking joke! Murray would have found a decent buyer if that tax case hadnt be hanging over us!

Not so sure we would have found a better buyer, one that would have paid more, but not necessarily better for the club.

[OlegKuznetsov 10,816]

Jim Traynor said in his column yesterday it would be this week! If we're guilty its tattie by to titles

That does not automatically follow, although there is great overlap between the cases.

[The Godfather 72,053]

Why you delete it LW?

[Edmiston Drive 3,846]

SDM, AJ, Bain et al all claimed it would go the way of Rangers! If we've won it I must admit this will leave me with a taste worse than a midgets spunk

Can't argue against that , as have never tasted said spunk.

[irish_ranger 5]

Its true now! Its been released Rangers have won

where do u see this?

[LeeWallaceRFC 3,920]

Why you delete it LW?

Didn't mean it lol.

The papers:

http://www.financean...851/TC02372.pdf

[RFC55 109,196]

Can't argue against that , as have never tasted said spunk.

Thought it was mayo! Turns out it was a midget called mylo

[The Godfather 72,053]

Leaking everywhere we have won...

[Blue Forever 179]

http://www.financeandtaxtribunals.gov.uk/judgmentfiles/j6851/TC02372.pdf

Income Tax and NIC – Schedule E – emoluments/earnings – tax avoidance

scheme - Remuneration Trust – employees’ individual sub-trusts –

“protectors” - (1) whether payments by employer into trust represent

emoluments subject to PAYE and NIC; - (2) whether benefits (particularly

loans) derived by employees from the Remuneration Trust represent

emoluments subject to PAYE and NIC; - (3) “Ramsay” doctrine – whether

applicable – whether trust and loan arrangements artificial and fall to be

disregarded; - No - Appeal allowed.

Looks like we won.

[Senna 735]

David Cowan @stvdavidc 28s

#rangers win big tax case. By 2:1, tribunal rules Ebts were loans so.no more tax due.

James Cook @BBCJamesCook 2m

By majority decision, the liquidated Rangers have won their tribunal appeal against a multi-million pound tax bill.

[LeeWallaceRFC 3,920]

Has the old company been officially liquidated?

[RFC55 109,196]

That does not automatically follow, although there is great overlap between the cases.

Let's face it mate had this went against us, they would have stripped them! They still might but this goes for us imo

[elephants stoned 2,994]

Bittersweet moment if this has been anounced, one big get it up yees to the mhanks, spl and all our enemys but as said it raises huge questions over admin, and makes Shyte into an even bigger scumbag than before, if thats possible. Strange feeling.

[Big Al 55 9,279]

Has the old company been officially liquidated?

No, that was my point earlier can they be merged, I appreciate there were other debts, well actually Ticketus £24M will put paid to that idea .

[MosesMcNeil 1,664]

Can someone much smarter than me in these matter (Boss!) explain it in layman's terms what this means to us?

[linfield1690 4,249]

Leaking everywhere we have won...

fucking leaking!