simplythebest 11,453 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 The problem is that this isn't nonsense ! I spoke to Charles Green at length at the beginning of the season and asked him how he managed to wrestle ownership/the floating charge that Whyte held from him. Green basically told me that he'd pulled a "fast one" on Whyte. I found this hard to believe knowing how devious Whyte is, which made me think that the two were linked. I believe that Green was a "front" for Whyte at the outset or at least this was what Whyte thought, before Green double crossed him. I always thought there was going to be more legal wranglings between these two at some point, having heard how Green secured control in the first place. I've said before that I don't trust Charles Green and still don't, although I pray that Whyte's legal challenge is thrown out of court.Bomber Brown has right.Exactly what was Brown right about? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickie1963 2,352 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Has anyone seen the Deeds ?I am not anti Green just yet but I couldnt bring myself to trust him before and this doesnt help.Just slagging off anyone who dares to suggest we should ask more questions is not on.The reason I left Follow Follow was because anyone with a view opposite to those with 10,000 posts got bullied into submission I can see the same thing happening here. This is too important to slag fellow bluenoses off because they dare to question. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Has anyone seen the Deeds ?I am not anti Green just yet but I couldnt bring myself to trust him before and this doesnt help.Just slagging off anyone who dares to suggest we should ask more questions is not on.The reason I left Follow Follow was because anyone with a view opposite to those with 10,000 posts got bullied into submission I can see the same thing happening here. This is too important to slag fellow bluenoses off because they dare to question.You didnt trust him before. You dont trust him not. But you are not anti GreenOkaaaaaay Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Andypendek Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 John Brown speaks on the steps on Ibrox.The media condemn him.Iain King says nothing.John Brown is appointed manager of Dundee.The media ridicule him, calling him a rabble rouser and worse.Iain King says nothing.Craig Whyte - Craig Whyte - says Charles Green is a liar.Iain King attacks Charles Green.The fact that he seems to feel nothing wrong with the way he has 'stood up' for John Brown until now tells you everything you need to know about Iain King, this story, and the kind of 'friends' footballers have. For your own benefit, John, dump this guy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Its amazing how times change, when Whyte was at Rangers and supposedly speaking for us he was a charletan and a proven lier according to the mhedia, now hes trying to cause us trouble from outside the club his word is taken as gosple and shouted loudly from tabloid front pages, its unbelievable and yet its not as the average IQ of the dedicated tabloid reader is slightly below that of a geriatric slug, they are too thick to realise the same papers who claimed Whyte couldnt be trusted on anything are now doing exactly that! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,610 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Its amazing how times change, when Whyte was at Rangers and supposedly speaking for us he was a charletan and a proven lier according to the mhedia, now hes trying to cause us trouble from outside the club his word is taken as gosple and shouted loudly from tabloid front pages, its unbelievable and yet its not as the average IQ of the dedicated tabloid reader is slightly below that of a geriatric slug, they are too thick to realise the same papers who claimed Whyte couldnt be trusted on anything are now doing exactly that!As long as they hate Rangers their word is good, that seems to be the medias take on it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 The problem is that this isn't nonsense ! I spoke to Charles Green at length at the beginning of the season and asked him how he managed to wrestle ownership/the floating charge that Whyte held from him. Green basically told me that he'd pulled a "fast one" on Whyte. I found this hard to believe knowing how devious Whyte is, which made me think that the two were linked. I believe that Green was a "front" for Whyte at the outset or at least this was what Whyte thought, before Green double crossed him. I always thought there was going to be more legal wranglings between these two at some point, having heard how Green secured control in the first place. I've said before that I don't trust Charles Green and still don't, although I pray that Whyte's legal challenge is thrown out of court.Bomber Brown has right. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non_Sucumbi 876 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Its amazing how times change, when Whyte was at Rangers and supposedly speaking for us he was a charletan and a proven lier according to the mhedia, now hes trying to cause us trouble from outside the club his word is taken as gosple and shouted loudly from tabloid front pages, its unbelievable and yet its not as the average IQ of the dedicated tabloid reader is slightly below that of a geriatric slug, they are too thick to realise the same papers who claimed Whyte couldnt be trusted on anything are now doing exactly that!Bit like DeFanio. When he was at Swindon he was an okay bloke. Now he's at Sunderland his political views are somewhere to the right of Genghis Khan....Bunch of parasites who will stoop to any length to sell their scabby stories. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 As long as they hate Rangers their word is good, that seems to be the medias take on it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blade 38 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Numerous previous posts on the subject of Green yet you only mention meeting him now. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm???Whether you believe me or not, I'm honestly telling you what Green told me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Bit like DeFanio. When he was at Swindon he was an okay bloke. Now he's at Sunderland his political views are somewhere to the right of Genghis Khan....Bunch of parasites who will stoop to any length to sell their scabby stories.Yeah its a joke that story, di canio is a wanker but the way the tabloids have gone on you'd think he had invaded England with the remenants of the third reich. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non_Sucumbi 876 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Whether you believe me or not, I'm honestly telling you what Green told me.Of course you are, never doubted you for a moment Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 The problem is that this isn't nonsense ! I spoke to Charles Green at length at the beginning of the season and asked him how he managed to wrestle ownership/the floating charge that Whyte held from him. Green basically told me that he'd pulled a "fast one" on Whyte. I found this hard to believe knowing how devious Whyte is, which made me think that the two were linked. I believe that Green was a "front" for Whyte at the outset or at least this was what Whyte thought, before Green double crossed him. I always thought there was going to be more legal wranglings between these two at some point, having heard how Green secured control in the first place. I've said before that I don't trust Charles Green and still don't, although I pray that Whyte's legal challenge is thrown out of court.Bomber Brown has right.R i g h t !!!!! So Charles green told you this did he?Honestly we have had some stupid and questionable posts over the past few days but this may be the worst... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 So what im reading from that 'Sevco' own Ibrox, Murray park and the car park. Whyte is/was a part of Sevco? What the fuck is going on? Time to ask questions and not to bury heads in sand.they just can't help themselves some times Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
legalbeagle 3,734 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 The problem is that this isn't nonsense ! I spoke to Charles Green at length at the beginning of the season and asked him how he managed to wrestle ownership/the floating charge that Whyte held from him. Green basically told me that he'd pulled a "fast one" on Whyte. I found this hard to believe knowing how devious Whyte is, which made me think that the two were linked. I believe that Green was a "front" for Whyte at the outset or at least this was what Whyte thought, before Green double crossed him. I always thought there was going to be more legal wranglings between these two at some point, having heard how Green secured control in the first place. I've said before that I don't trust Charles Green and still don't, although I pray that Whyte's legal challenge is thrown out of court.Bomber Brown has right.I have tried and tried to read this post.I don't get it. What was he right about? What do we know today (and I mean KNOW) that we didn't before? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 I have tried and tried to read this post.I don't get it. What was he right about? What do we know today (and I mean KNOW) that we didn't before?We know Blade (and many others) deserves the "eyes" but admin would ban anyone for it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 The shifty eyes are allowed IMO.If they were not OK the the smiley woukd no longer be there Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Zomg thw shifties are gone. Admin out now Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Thats taking the new rule a step too farBring back Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Justice for ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 This is now a thread. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Free the shifty eyesAdmin out Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 This is a disgrass. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 This is a disgrass.Plane stupidity Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Poor hes in RM heaven with :pierre: now Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.