rangersxfc 265 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Lets be humble eh? Mathercompare and contrastRangers fined £160.000 for going into administration & transfer embargoDunfermline no fine Hearts no fine embargo until end of January Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
True Azure 1,414 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 ??? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allanger 625 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 A fucking disgrace. Really fucking shocking. Bastards Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
True Azure 1,414 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Anyone care to clarify. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangersxfc 265 Posted August 1, 2013 Author Share Posted August 1, 2013 ???STV reporting Hearts will not face a financial penalty for going into Admin Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
islandblue 366 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 If this is the SPL decision on Hearts I expect to hear us going mad Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Lets be humble eh? MatherAnd why is that mathers fault? Does he make decisions for the SPfl cabal now? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
there'sonlyoneamoruso 1,724 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 What a load of bull! Even a token fine should've been applied.Why is their transfer embargo only until February? Surely it should've been until end of the season?Smacks of double standards to me!sport.stv.tv/football/234744-hearts-hit-with-extended-signing-ban-by-sfa-for-entering-administration/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR 1,480 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Stv...Hearts hit with new signing ban by Scottish FA for entering administrationThu, 1 Aug 2013 15:31:26 BSTHeart of Midlothian have been barred for registering new players over the age of 21 until February 2014 by the Scottish FA.The decision was reached at Hampden on Thursday is punishment for the club entering administration.The embargo will bar the club from recruiting players older than 21 until the end of the January transfer window and means Gary Locke will be unable to add experienced players to his small squad of players until at least February.No financial penalty was imposed by the disciplinary panel.Hearts were represented at the hearing by joint administrator Trevor Birch, of BDO.Hearts entered administration on June 19 as the weight of their debts become too much for the club to continue with.BDO were appointed with the blessing of the Lithuanian authorities, to whom the club owes around £25m to Ukio Bankas and UBIG.The automatic sanctions imposed by the SPL, now rebranded at the SPFL, were a 15 point penalty for the season ahead, plus a full registration embargo for the duration of the administration.There are currently two bidders attempting to buy the club out of administration.However neither fan-backed Foundation of Hearts, nor Five Star Football Ltd run by former Livingston owner Angelo Massone, have yet been able to agree a deal with the major creditors in Lithuania. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 sounds totally fair. good luck Hearts. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loyalfollower 1,543 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Although fining a club in administration is ludicrous a precedent was set im march 2012 by the sfa. 50, 000 for entering administration 100, 000 for bringing the game into disrepute and a transfer embargo for 12 months. Who the hell can we get to sort this bigoted association out? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FernandoR20 2,133 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Absolute joke. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
True Azure 1,414 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 If this is indeed the case, I would expect our club to be absolutely outraged by this given what we were subjected to last year. If the SPFL have sanctioned this I would also expect our club to be looking down the legal route to establish why one set of punishments were used against one club and an entirely different rule was used against another for the same offense. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,327 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Of course there is no financial penalty it would be stupidity of the highest order to impose a financial penalty on someone in administration wouldn't it.Really what should be happening is offer of an advance on their TV monies. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allanger 625 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 If this is indeed the case, I would expect our club to be absolutely outraged by this given what we were subjected to last year. If the SPFL have sanctioned this I would also expect our club to be looking down the legal route to establish why one set of punishments were used against one club and an entirely different rule was used against another for the same offense.Thats more sensible and rational than my outburst but I am really disgusted at the football authorities. Where is the level playing field? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
quinty 1,445 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 If this is indeed the case, I would expect our club to be absolutely outraged by this given what we were subjected to last year. If the SPFL have sanctioned this I would also expect our club to be looking down the legal route to establish why one set of punishments were used against one club and an entirely different rule was used against another for the same offense.Different organisation, different rule book I'm afraid, it's shite, but there it is. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueAvenger 10,530 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 The corrupt cabal dont even try to hide their agenda.. The SFA/SPFL have no shame and are a disgrace. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangersxfc 265 Posted August 1, 2013 Author Share Posted August 1, 2013 And why is that mathers fault? Does he make decisions for the SPfl cabal now?Nope the point is we have got f all to be humble about It's about time we start taking the "cabal" as you call them to task. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gersman89 14 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Embargo on over 21s? Why the fuck was ours 18? Dirty fuckers don't half make it up as they go along! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,344 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 "Players over 21".Over 18 for us, was it not? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 If this is indeed the case, I would expect our club to be absolutely outraged by this given what we were subjected to last year. If the SPFL have sanctioned this I would also expect our club to be looking down the legal route to establish why one set of punishments were used against one club and an entirely different rule was used against another for the same offense. They will not get involved Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albertz 78 918 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Still not paid the June wage bill and no share issue certificate issued after 9 months which is illegal but no fine for bringing the game into disrepute?Unpaid tax and money owed to charities as well but it's not Rangers so it's okay. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
True Azure 1,414 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Different organisation, different rule book I'm afraid, it's shite, but there it is.Indeed. So how come our transfer embargo from the SPL is still in place then? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,624 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 We are weak in the boardroom and the Pr department or we would be tackling the idiots who have one law for Rangers and one law for the rest of the clubs.What a corrupt set of bastards we have currently running Scottish Football. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rapid6 77 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 I wonder if the SPL and the SPFL can be construed as 2 different companies and therefore that is why the 2 punishments are different?Even if this is the case, sporting integrity seems to have went down the pan. Expect the deafening silence from the usual media sources and of course, RFC! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.