johnw 22 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 In my opinion he is just looking for a payout. "Give me money and I will go away quietly". McColl is right to refuse this kind of blackmail.ofcourse hes right to refuse he is busy with his main business i get that, in my opinion it seems his name gets banded about without his say so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnw 22 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 It's good to have him on side. Like having a mate who'll stab himself in the face to show that he'll be handy in a scrap.lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,137 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 When is all this shite and in fighting going to stop, I just want Rangers to be back where it was, what the fuck does it matter who or what is in charge?.....let's just play football and win trophies.I thought the scum were our worst enemies but it seems it's Rangers men. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weird_Beard 99 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 i think so. he comes across as an honest straight to the point guy. like i said to someone else its just my opinion.I agree with you. If Imran takes this to court then Green will defend him because it was him that signed the bonus agreement. That means that both get the thumbs down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 157 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 I see no reason why both the Rangers Board and former Directors could not agree to disclosure of relevant extracts of the contracts that the Directors were given. If specified bonuses or fees or expenses or whatever other language the contracts use to describe money are legally binding contractual commitments, and if they nature of the deal was that for every £1m of commercial revenue banked by Rangers as a direct result of a contract negotiated and signed a % goes to the person (or persons) resonsible for winning the business and concluding favourable deals that manifestly benefit the Club then that should be apparent from their contracts. The challenge to the Board and to those who have contractual claims is to waive their rights to confidentiality and diclose the contractual deal they all agreed to. The facts will speak for themselves. Whether or not we all think the deals were justified or appropriate is quite another matter of course. But the facts of the deals are the facts and it would, in my view, be sensible to disclose them and save everybody a heap more unncessary anguish and speculation.The contracts of serving directors have to be made available for shareholders to inspect at the registered company address (Ibrox) during normal business hours as a requirement of the Companies Act. However even this would not have revealed Imran's cut of commercial deals as rather conveniently he was not on the plc board just the private company one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnw 22 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 I agree with you. If Imran takes this to court then Green will defend him because it was hiim that signed the bonus agreement. That means that both get the thumbs down.imagine he did put the monery straight bk into Rangers how much would that be a big f##k u to the 'Rangers men' who want the club for next to nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HHB 63 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 imagine he did put the monery straight bk into Rangers how much would that be a big f##k u to the 'Rangers men' who want the club for next to nothing.He is going to put our money back into the club ... minus our and his legal expense no doubt? Excuse me if I am not impressed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,252 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 imagine he did put the monery straight bk into Rangers how much would that be a big f##k u to the 'Rangers men' who want the club for next to nothing.I respect everyone's right to an opinion but...are you for real? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnw 22 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 I respect everyone's right to an opinion but...are you for real?yeah Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnw 22 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 He is going to put our money back into the club ... minus our and his legal expense no doubt? Excuse me if I am not impressed.u dont know that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,252 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 yeahExactly what would Green and/or Ahmed have to do before you changed your mind?And you think Ahmed suing the club would be a fuck you to Rangers Men.Another poster who uses it as a derogatory term incidentally Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnw 22 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 Exactly what would Green and/or Ahmed have to do before you changed your mind?And you think Ahmed suing the club would be a fuck you to Rangers Men.Another poster who uses it as a derogatory term incidentallyi appologise for the 'Rangers men' part but i actually said him putting it bk into Rangers after all hes being painted as the big baddie. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blumhoilann 6,712 Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 The fact he is suing the club yet claims he is going to invest whatever he gets is completely bizarre!I get more worried by the day for our club.Not bizarre at all.If he was to win the case and got £3.4mil he could buy a hell of a chunk of shares,which are at a very low price,at no cost to himself.These guts operate on the long finger,not quick deals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Some may not support the 'others'. They have however done not a bad job at opening the loyal eyes with their leaks.Re the use of the word others..............I don't know who they are as mini has no clout to pull anything off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Imran made a statement saying he was suing Rangers. That's not tittle tattle.I have yet to see this shown on here either by a document or by any substantiated quotes.................plus if he is to sue the Ltd Co, please don't put it out there as Rangers as I along with thousands of others think of Rangers as our team not the Ltd Co...............well he must have sought legal advice and been told that he has a case , now if you had legal advice against a Ltd Co. for money would you take legal action Y/N.He is not suing Rangers he is suing a Ltd Co, if indeed this is the case and not some tittle tattle that has been put out there to cause ructions for the benefit of certain people. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainofIndustry 921 Posted August 14, 2013 Author Share Posted August 14, 2013 no idea I havnt seen any who do that.Everyone, and I mean every last person who supports the others can explain in great detail why.Do you not follow this forum its full of reasons even this thread should you care to have a look Everyone who backs Paul Murray to return can explain why?? I must have missed a lot of posts, in that case. I've never seen any reason given other than "he's a Rangers man". Is that the "great detail" you meant? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RD.1872 890 Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christchurch Rangers 1,229 Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 It's all just utter BS behind the scenes at Ibrox these days.but one by one we are seeing the true colours (and motivations) of the individuals involved.How suing the club, which is already struggling, can be construed as anything but totally destructive is beyond me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 what makes u think he wont? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 I have yet to see this shown on here either by a document or by any substantiated quotes.................plus if he is to sue the Ltd Co, please don't put it out there as Rangers as I along with thousands of others think of Rangers as our team not the Ltd Co...............well he must have sought legal advice and been told that he has a case , now if you had legal advice against a Ltd Co. for money would you take legal action Y/N.He is not suing Rangers he is suing a Ltd Co, if indeed this is the case and not some tittle tattle that has been put out there to cause ructions for the benefit of certain people.Fucking hell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Fucking hell.It's called business son and he is not suing Rangers it's the Ltd Co, now go and watch andy pandy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue and True 311 Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Everyone who backs Paul Murray to return can explain why?? I must have missed a lot of posts, in that case. I've never seen any reason given other than "he's a Rangers man". Is that the "great detail" you meant?I have gone in to detail on PM and why he is good for us.The fact is that rather than focus on him we should be looking at the people he is fronting.None of the previous deals where PM was involved were financed by him....but you know that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue and True 311 Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Edmiston Drive, on 14 August 2013 - 05:33 AM, said:I have yet to see this shown on here either by a document or by any substantiated quotes.................plus if he is to sue the Ltd Co, please don't put it out there as Rangers as I along with thousands of others think of Rangers as our team not the Ltd Co...............well he must have sought legal advice and been told that he has a case , now if you had legal advice against a Ltd Co. for money would you take legal action Y/N.He is not suing Rangers he is suing a Ltd Co, if indeed this is the case and not some tittle tattle that has been put out there to cause ructions for the benefit of certain people.===you do know the company fund the team.... so the 3,4 million will come out of the budget... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Edmiston Drive, on 14 August 2013 - 05:33 AM, said:I have yet to see this shown on here either by a document or by any substantiated quotes.................plus if he is to sue the Ltd Co, please don't put it out there as Rangers as I along with thousands of others think of Rangers as our team not the Ltd Co...............well he must have sought legal advice and been told that he has a case , now if you had legal advice against a Ltd Co. for money would you take legal action Y/N.He is not suing Rangers he is suing a Ltd Co, if indeed this is the case and not some tittle tattle that has been put out there to cause ructions for the benefit of certain people.===you do know the company fund the team.... so the 3,4 million will come out of the budget...It most certainly will not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Copland bear 7,966 Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Any one that runs to the record and Keith Jackson should not be anywhere near Ibrox. As for the £67m he is bringing into the club' Show us the proof. thehost 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts