D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 For some, myself included, the announcement by BBC Scotland that they were going to undertake a formal investigation into the circumstances leading to the current furore with their reporter Jim Spence, came as something of a surprise. I use the word surprise because in committing themselves to such a course of action, BBC Scotland are very much putting themselves on trial.I wonder if myself or any of the thousands of other Rangers fans who several months ago on BBC Sportsound heard the aforementioned Jim Spence declare "I don't care what the Rangers fans say - this is a new club" will be cited as witnesses in this investigation ? Of course there is no need - it’s all there in the BBC Scotland archives.Funnily enough on this point I agree with part of what Spence says. It doesn't really matter what the Rangers support say about this matter - we have neither the authority or legal expertise to pass conclusive and objective opinion. Neither does Jim Spence for that matter - his job is to report the conclusions of those who do possess such authority and expertise. The fact he has failed to do so represents considerable professional failings on his part (which are compounded considerably by the fact his own employers have previously reported on Lord Nimmo Smith's legal conclusions and the SFA's decision to transfer licence)But before a very vigilant Rangers support BBC Scotland's investigative process and its conclusions will be subject to the closest of scrutiny. The corporations standing not only with our support, but the club itself, is at an all time low, and I would hazard a guess that the widespread animosity shown by BBC Scotland in the last few years towards Rangers has been a contributory factor in the lack of confidence Scots have in the corporation. I'm not for a minute suggesting there is sympathy for us by non-Rangers Scots, just that a club with a support the size Rangers have means that any survey of Scots society would result in a fair number who cast a favourable eye towards Ibrox being surveyed.But its more that BBC Scotland's popularity which is on trial. It's journalistic integrity is in the dock, the very heart and soul of the press and media is going to be subjected to the closest of forensic examination. For a regional corporation already lagging behind its peers in terms of public confidence this could well be a watershed.And it should come as no surprise that it will be far more than just the Rangers support maintaining a watching brief on events. For the BBC Trust who have already had cause to intercede in this battle between the Rangers support and BBC Scotland there will be both a sense of foreboding and déjà vu. For barely a year has passed since the BBC were savaged for their failures in light of the Jimmy Savile scandal. Both their investigative processes and their ability to challenge the behaviour of one of their employees has caused the corporation massive damage. Some suggest perhaps fatal damage. The true extent cannot be gauged however until politicians sit down to discuss whether the corporation should be awarded the right to demand a licence and the subsequent public reaction to this. The problem for the BBC is that politicians have a tendency to do what is popular with voters rather than what is necessarily the right thing to do.And whilst the Leveson enquiry dealt with the behaviour of the written press it nevertheless has resulted in considerable change across the entire spectrum of the press and media irrespective of whether it is the written or spoken word.And what of the individual who was the catalyst to all this ? Is he displaying remorse or regret for the position he has forced his employers into ? Regretfully not instead he is busy playing to the gallery of "usual suspects - that intrepid band of Rangers hating individuals who just happen for convenience sake to carry an NUJ card - and have been too happy to squeal about "abuse of journalists" and "freedom of speech".(It is entirely co-incidental of course that this group only make an appearance when a journalist is challenged about anti-Rangers rhetoric) But let's stick with the word abuse here because it is pivotal to this whole debate. It appears the fact that the truth has been abused seems, sadly, to be of little consequence to many.But for those of us who wish to protect and maintain the ethos of a BBC whose accuracy and impartiality once earned world renown, perhaps the gravest abuse in all of this is a maverick journalist using the BBC as a platform to espouse not only his disdain for a football club - but expressing that disdain in a manner which is both inaccurate and misleading. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tam57 698 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 I suspect that there would not be an investigation if they thought it was going to find against Spence.It will be a cover up to try and make us look bad again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clunge 864 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Spot on, as per D'art! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,249 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 In my humble opinion there will be absolutely no action taken against Jim Spence. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprotson11 147 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Great job Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wombatdropping 182 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Who is carrying out this investigation ? If it is BBC Scotland employees then i wouldn't hold out too much hope of it being anything other than a paper exercise. "BBC Scotland find themselves not guilty of anything and are now free to carry on with their Rangers hating agenda "I really hope that the findings of this investigation are made public. All in the name of transparency of course.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agoram1 42 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Excellent read but I truly believe this 'investigation' is purely for show. The result will come back as us being in the wrong. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodvale1690 43 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 again, sound stuff d'art, how transparent will this investigation be or will it be closed door and we might hear in a year or two the outcome? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 I suspect that there would not be an investigation if they thought it was going to find against Spence.It will be a cover up to try and make us look bad again.I dont think there will be a cover up but if you look at the recent BBC trust case with us, they upheld the complaint, but rejected parts of the complaints which alleged that use of the terms was a result of "anti-Rangers bias".It will be interesting to see if they go down that route again, with a man who is a repeat offender. How many times does it have to happen before the BBC Trust see that bias and bigotry are at the core of all this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 For some, myself included, the announcement by BBC Scotland that they were going to undertake a formal investigation into the circumstances leading to the current furore with their reporter Jim Spence, came as something of a surprise. I use the word surprise because in committing themselves to such a course of action, BBC Scotland are very much putting themselves on trial.I wonder if myself or any of the thousands of other Rangers fans who several months ago on BBC Sportsound heard the aforementioned Jim Spence declare "I don't care what the Rangers fans say - this is a new club" will be cited as witnesses in this investigation ? Of course there is no need - it’s all there in the BBC Scotland archives.Funnily enough on this point I agree with part of what Spence says. It doesn't really matter what the Rangers support say about this matter - we have neither the authority or legal expertise to pass conclusive and objective opinion. Neither does Jim Spence for that matter - his job is to report the conclusions of those who do possess such authority and expertise. The fact he has failed to do so represents considerable professional failings on his part (which are compounded considerably by the fact his own employers have previously reported on Lord Nimmo Smith's legal conclusions and the SFA's decision to transfer licence)But before a very vigilant Rangers support BBC Scotland's investigative process and its conclusions will be subject to the closest of scrutiny. The corporations standing not only with our support, but the club itself, is at an all time low, and I would hazard a guess that the widespread animosity shown by BBC Scotland in the last few years towards Rangers has been a contributory factor in the lack of confidence Scots have in the corporation. I'm not for a minute suggesting there is sympathy for us by non-Rangers Scots, just that a club with a support the size Rangers have means that any survey of Scots society would result in a fair number who cast a favourable eye towards Ibrox being surveyed.But its more that BBC Scotland's popularity which is on trial. It's journalistic integrity is in the dock, the very heart and soul of the press and media is going to be subjected to the closest of forensic examination. For a regional corporation already lagging behind its peers in terms of public confidence this could well be a watershed.And it should come as no surprise that it will be far more than just the Rangers support maintaining a watching brief on events. For the BBC Trust who have already had cause to intercede in this battle between the Rangers support and BBC Scotland there will be both a sense of foreboding and déjà vu. For barely a year has passed since the BBC were savaged for their failures in light of the Jimmy Savile scandal. Both their investigative processes and their ability to challenge the behaviour of one of their employees has caused the corporation massive damage. Some suggest perhaps fatal damage. The true extent cannot be gauged however until politicians sit down to discuss whether the corporation should be awarded the right to demand a licence and the subsequent public reaction to this. The problem for the BBC is that politicians have a tendency to do what is popular with voters rather than what is necessarily the right thing to do.And whilst the Leveson enquiry dealt with the behaviour of the written press it nevertheless has resulted in considerable change across the entire spectrum of the press and media irrespective of whether it is the written or spoken word.And what of the individual who was the catalyst to all this ? Is he displaying remorse or regret for the position he has forced his employers into ? Regretfully not instead he is busy playing to the gallery of "usual suspects - that intrepid band of Rangers hating individuals who just happen for convenience sake to carry an NUJ card - and have been too happy to squeal about "abuse of journalists" and "freedom of speech".(It is entirely co-incidental of course that this group only make an appearance when a journalist is challenged about anti-Rangers rhetoric) But let's stick with the word abuse here because it is pivotal to this whole debate. It appears the fact that the truth has been abused seems, sadly, to be of little consequence to many.But for those of us who wish to protect and maintain the ethos of a BBC whose accuracy and impartiality once earned world renown, perhaps the gravest abuse in all of this is a maverick journalist using the BBC as a platform to espouse not only his disdain for a football club - but expressing that disdain in a manner which is both inaccurate and misleading.Interesting - got a link - on mobile bit could not find story? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimgers 565 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 "A corporation on Trial"Who's the Judge and Jury on that trial?Answers on a postcard to......gies a break @jimgers Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rfc#1. 1,877 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 I don't have much faith in the integrity of bbc scotland investigating their own. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,526 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 A lot of credit is due to those in the vanguard of this issue. We all moan on internet forums, but in the end that gets us nowhere. Kudos to those that step forward and have the determination and resolve to do something more purposeful and are stubborn enough to keep ploughing through the pea-souper that always seems to be thrown up as defenses around said issues. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,606 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 They covered up for Jimmy Saville i don't see this being any different. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Whilst I don't expect anything more than a reprimand in public, behind the scenes spence will have to explain himself to his bosses cos they will have to explain it to theirs This sends a warning to the rest of the pack, draws a line in the sand. The days of saying what you like unchallenged are gone. It just shows you what be done with some persistence. Just a shame it wasn't the club that did it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted September 19, 2013 Author Share Posted September 19, 2013 Interesting - got a link - on mobile bit could not find story?http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/bbc-to-investigate-row-with-rangers-fans.22152836 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 358 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Another excellent article. Keep up the good work D'Art! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
16BlueSherbert90 19,223 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Thank you D'Art.I would like to hope the said investigation will bring us good news with regards to Spence and his poor attitude although, I think with the NUJ backing him up also, there may not be a lot of action made. I could be wrong of course. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
californiadreamin52 339 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 My respect for this once bastion of true and integrity has long disappear do to the lack of informed, balanced, and dependant reporting therefore I fear this will be an exercise in futility and a total whitewash both of which BBC Scotland have excelled in over the resent years Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
corkinator 611 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 http://www.heraldsco...s-fans.22152836Just read the last couple of lines in the article from the BBC, this tells you how the "investigation" will go. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Great persistance by our support to get this far but i cant see anything but a whitewashing cover up coming from this investigation i hope i am pleasently suprised but i wont be holding my breath Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutchy 1,200 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 The production at BBC Scotland in general is becoming more and more Irish/Jacobite orientated. They're forever making programs about Mary Queen of Scots, have more and more Irish people even presenting their programs, or the subjects of their programs. I was listening to a new guy the other day fronting their noon time news I think it was. His name was Niall O'Galacher think. There's no way you will get a fair hearing from that bunch, much like Monklands/Lanarkshire labour party being censured for having different coloured forms for job applications. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellowbelly 14 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Jim Spence admonished, Rangers guilty and fined by SPFL and SFA with transfer embargo and ground closure titles stripped and all monies from Ramsdens Cup final victory kept by SPFL. you can just see it coming. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger77 742 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 D'Art your posts get better and better. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Heaven 37 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 "The BBC Trust's Editorial Standards Committee are to investigate hundreds of complaints about Mr Spence's comments on Sportsound.Fans have escalated the complaint because they were unsatisfied with BBC Scotland's response and that no apology was heard from the presenter."The BBC TRUST have already upheld 2 Ranger's fans complaints & set down the guidelines for wording to be used regards RANGERS, Spence & BBC Scotland have ignored the Trust's guidelines this is a golden opportunity for the Trust to enforce it's authority by throwing the book at BBC Scotland & Spence.I believe the BBC Trust's Editorial Standards Committee will take this opportunity for revenge on BBC Scotland. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.