Twitter reporting that Three Bloggers will be banned from Ibrox

[Carson's cat 744]

i hope fatty,the old alky and furby are all banned...get out the champagne

Grow up. There's much more at stake here than inter-fan rivalries. Banning people for speaking out against the Board would be completely unacceptable and, in my view, counter-productive.

[RFC55 109,212]

Fat Muirheid is one of Toxic Jacks outs.....

This could be the start of the dirty war some have mentioned.

Aw aye the wonderful pr man who spends his time spouting shite to fat Fenians. If the club want to get rid of folk then get rid of this waste of spunk

[RFC55 109,212]

Not all our Fans are on line ,so just let it happen in my opinion these guys are damaging the Club.

Ok if they want to make a difference they need to invest.

Simple.

Ally opinion bit if you don't like it then.

Tuff.

Are you fucking mwi? I don't get wtf you're gibbering about

[BLUEDIGNITY 33,660]

Heard a rumour that muirhead takes it up the hummer ! Waiting for twitter to confirm right enough !

[Blue Atheist 178]

I wonder who the third blogger is? Unless its maybe someone with a column in the mainstream media like Tom English? His is effectively a glorified blog and he's forever having a pop at us.

[Carson's cat 744]

Not all our Fans are on line ,so just let it happen in my opinion these guys are damaging the Club.

Ok if they want to make a difference they need to invest.

Simple.

All my opinion but if you don't like it then.

Tuff.

You're missing the point. They're not damaging the club. They're maybe damaging the Board, but the Board is not the club. Shareholders and fans have every right to be critical of the way the club is being run. Trying to silence them smacks of Stalinism.

[North Rd 2,860]

Aw aye the wonderful pr man who spends his time spouting shite to fat Fenians. If the club want to get rid of folk then get rid of this waste of spunk

Waiting on Bawbags confirming it, seems to be in with Irvine/McMurdo

[Big Al 55 9,279]

Someone has to protect the Brand.

So just don't blog.

Simple.

Rangers is the brand...not the board

[nachothelegend 1,932]

Are you fucking mwi? I don't get wtf you're gibbering about

Aye well you will never fucking know then.

[RFC55 109,212]

Aye well you will never fucking know then.

Ffs

[nachothelegend 1,932]

Rangers is the brand...not the board

Some cnut has to protect it which is more than I can say than that cnut Murray and cronies.

[trueblue68 2,497]

Well this is an interesting turn of events.

[nachothelegend 1,932]

Ffs

Enjoy your Beer son.

[Carsons Dog 9,878]

If Leggo did lie in his blog the other day then he deserves a ban

It's one thing having an opinion but if he is blogging bare faced lies which harm the club then he should not be allowed anywhere near Ibrox

Like Spiers & Co shouldn't either

[MayboleLoyal_atb 3,731]

Where does it stop? Wee joe in bf2 who's not a fan of the board. If this is true its pathetic from the board. Speirs, keevins and many others rip into the club and fans regularly without any sort of comeback.

I'm not a fan of Dingwall nor Lego, Chris isnae bad but banning them for not being for the board would be pathetic.

Agree

[Carson's cat 744]

Some cnut has to protect it which is more than I can say than that cnut Murray and cronies.

Really, I suppose you think the prime minister should start banning newspapers 'in order to protect the brand' if they start to criticise government policy.

[californiadreamin52 339]

Dingwall ,Lego, Chris is the word on the street but no confirmation this is obviously a measure to silence the critics of our current regime this board must be getting worried about there posts

[Dennis 1,011]

Hope they ban fenians.

[eosmhdo 1,879]

Banning for speaking against a regime, sounds like something you'd associate with a dictatorship. Not good news at all- even if you don't like Chris or the other bloggers that have supposedly been banned- they've been banned for quite simply sharing their opinion.

Bloggers publish their thoughts and are not the same as fan to fans talking in the pub.

They know the score and just have to dig more dirt to get them back on side with the regime.

It's how theses things work.

You have to earn to right to publish criticism IMO.

Media get away with it as they can also promote the brand, bloggers don't do that.

When was the last time a blogger wrote that all was great.

The media generally fuck us over but we use them also at times.

It's an unwritten rule that bloggers are not party to until that worm their way in to the fold imo

[trueblue68 2,497]

Really, I suppose you think the prime minister should start banning newspapers 'in order to protect the brand' if they start to criticise government policy.

Has anyone from the Rangers support ever met Chris at a Rangers game - Pre us going into admin etc?

[Stoorie 1,088]

OH SHIT!

It's on TWITTER?

We're all doomed.............dooooooooooooooooooommmmeed, I tell ya.

[j1mgg 3,766]

Some of the people mentioned are just doing as much damage to the club as the journos mentioned.

The journos do it as their jobs, you can decide why the others do it.

[Smile 26,610]

The rumour is that David Leggat, Chris Graham & Mark Dingwall are the 3 names.

If it's true, it's a scandal, are the board that weak that they can't stand up to a bit of criticism.

Not really if they feel they are trying to destabilize the club. Which is a view shared on here by many.

[Big Al 55 9,279]

Some cnut has to protect it which is more than I can say than that cnut Murray and cronies.

The bloggers aren't saying anything against Rangers. If indeed those are the bloggers in question they are undoubtedly passionate fans and are quite entitled to call into question the running of the club.

Indeed they have far more right to attend Ibrox than Stockbridge will ever have.

A bit of de ja vu going in here is there not?

[North Rd 2,860]

Has anyone from the Rangers support ever met Chris at a Rangers game - Pre us going into admin etc?

And, your point is caller?